Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Eklund Curse (Retardation?) Lives!

CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
in Hardcore Husky Board
Says yesterday he doesn't see Henry Roberts getting offered by Stanford.... Today, Henry Roberts was offered by Stanford.

Keep it up, Scott! El Oh El.





I like bacon maple bars.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • SandyHookerSandyHooker Member Posts: 343
    Sure you mention the ones he gets wrong, but you never mention the ones where it gets it right.

    Of course he never gets it right, but still...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DardanusDardanus Member Posts: 2,623
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    A few more notches in his sequin belt. Thanks for sharing Pepsi

    PL_SS has life dialed the fuck in.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,239
    One has to wonder, does it bother the guy that he makes a public prediction as part of his job and immediately the opposite happens, or is he too stupid yo be ashamed of that?

    His other recent prediction is that 5-10 players will leave the team after spring practice due to not buying into Petersen's philosophy (so we're not talking Damiin Turpin or Taylor Hindy). We'll have to wait and see.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    HuskyJW said:

    Scott correctly predicted no offer from Stanford with the information given......obviously Stanford changed their mind....doesn't make him wrong.

    Some of you need to learn the difference

    Whack this fuck too!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,197 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Scott correctly predicted no offer from Stanford with the information given......obviously Stanford changed their mind....doesn't make him wrong.

    Some of you need to learn the difference

    Whack this fuck too!
    close the friggin' gates?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,999 Swaye's Wigwam
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Scott correctly predicted no offer from Stanford with the information given......obviously Stanford changed their mind....doesn't make him wrong.

    Some of you need to learn the difference

    Whack this fuck too!
    PLSS you should contact Irishdoog for a little refresher. Your content lately has been top notch but your comprehension is still lagging.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Ektard has gone off the deep end. Hopefully he is too fat to come up for air. The guy needs to go. He says he doesn't know why everyone brings up 92-12 because there is no way Petersen can match that at UW.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Ektard has gone off the deep end. Hopefully he is too fat to come up for air. The guy needs to go. He says he doesn't know why everyone brings up 92-12 because there is no way Petersen can match that at UW.

    UW needs to close the fucking gates on Doogman already.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,774 Founders Club
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Ektard has gone off the deep end. Hopefully he is too fat to come up for air. The guy needs to go. He says he doesn't know why everyone brings up 92-12 because there is no way Petersen can match that at UW.

    I agree that he's not going 92-12, but to be in wait-and-see mode while praising Sark and defending his infidelities is fucking retarded (WIW). Ektard is the one of the trio that's hardest to actually hate, but he's a part of it, big time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    92-12 isn't the point... if he can consistently go above 7 wins then all is good brah
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,239
    Kim's newest attack on CP: he might not have recruited DAT. This guy just doesn't stop. The only posters on the entire bored who are trying to rile up negativity about the new coach are the assholes who run the site
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Ektard has gone off the deep end. Hopefully he is too fat to come up for air. The guy needs to go. He says he doesn't know why everyone brings up 92-12 because there is no way Petersen can match that at UW.

    Either he's really fucking stupid or he's grasping for an argument. I know, abundance. But that's the stupidest fucking argument. That's just like saying Craig Bohl at Wyoming sucks because he won't win 3 straight natties. Fuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.