Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
For Thomas

WestlinnDuck
Member Posts: 17,616

in Tug Tavern
I posted this last week, but apparently Thomas who feels very strongly about wind, solar and batteries didn’t either read it, understand it or both. It still surprises me that someone who claims to have some education and is posting on a political board about something that appears to be a very important topic has so little actual knowledge about a subject and has absolutely no intellectual curiosity about the subject. But with some really strong feelings they are happy to proclaim conservatives as anti-science. This article clearly indicates we are near the scientific physical limits for efficient wind and solar generation. That the green gaia religionists are happy to ignore the actual environmental and cost impacts including the CO2 impacts of the mining and construction costs to build wind and solar projects and to build inefficient lithium batteries.
So, while the US hasn’t built a new utility scale coal plant in the US since 2015, India has 50,000 megawatts of coal plants under construction. China is frantically building coal plants. Germany and Japan are building coal plants. The US has half the CO2 production of the chicoms and is decreasing its CO2 production. Europe, India and China – all still in the Paris Accords are increasing CO2 production. And yet US leftards feel that we are the problem.
As this article makes clear, if you want are serious about limiting CO2 production without destroying the US economy by trying to pretend that there is a serious physics problem with 100% renewables, then you would need to support building nukes and expanding LNG production and shipping it to Europe and Asia. But, leftards aren’t serious. So, Thomas – read the damn article and at least try to understand it. I promise you won’t burn in a green gaia hell.
https://www.manhattan-institute.org-green-energy-revolution-near-impossible
So, while the US hasn’t built a new utility scale coal plant in the US since 2015, India has 50,000 megawatts of coal plants under construction. China is frantically building coal plants. Germany and Japan are building coal plants. The US has half the CO2 production of the chicoms and is decreasing its CO2 production. Europe, India and China – all still in the Paris Accords are increasing CO2 production. And yet US leftards feel that we are the problem.
As this article makes clear, if you want are serious about limiting CO2 production without destroying the US economy by trying to pretend that there is a serious physics problem with 100% renewables, then you would need to support building nukes and expanding LNG production and shipping it to Europe and Asia. But, leftards aren’t serious. So, Thomas – read the damn article and at least try to understand it. I promise you won’t burn in a green gaia hell.
https://www.manhattan-institute.org-green-energy-revolution-near-impossible
Comments
-
Freezing, starving and not being allowed to travel at all will all be big components of the Green New Deal. When haven't socialists starved?
-
I fully support nuclear energy. I’ve stated so numerous times.
-
Da fuq kinda identity theft link is that?
-
You just vote for fantasy land dems who hate nukes and natural gas and dream of battery powered unicorn farts. Hardly adult behavior. You do realize that freezing in the dark isn't as much fun as it sounds.
-
I like to show my "support" for things by voting for people who don't support it.ThomasFremont said:I fully support nuclear energy. I’ve stated so numerous times.
-
The green new deal has ZERO nuclear in it besides getting rid of existing nuclear as possible. You lefties will need a lot more unicorn farts.
But it's all in for killing as many children as possible for the green cause!
https://freebeacon.com/politics/sanders-sidesteps-question-on-population-control/ -
Too bad none of the retards who influence policy don’t. Plus the no nukes science denier crowd is pretty vocal on the left.ThomasFremont said:I fully support nuclear energy. I’ve stated so numerous times.
Anyone who doesn’t include nuclear as a major part of a CO2 lower strategy doesn’t actually care about CO2 (or the poor) They care about control. -
Hi. I didn’t write the Green New Deal.
The candidate I intend to vote for supports nuclear energy.
Try again. -
So you're voting for Trump? None of they lefties are going to say they want more nuclear plants. Not gonna happen.ThomasFremont said:Hi. I didn’t write the Green New Deal.
The candidate I intend to vote for supports nuclear energy.
Try again. -
I will not be voting for Trump.
-
Who else supports nuclear power and it's expansion?ThomasFremont said:I will not be voting for Trump.
-
Andrew YangSledog said:
Who else supports nuclear power and it's expansion?ThomasFremont said:I will not be voting for Trump.
-
Good luck with that. He has a huge "L" on his forehead.ThomasFremont said:
Andrew YangSledog said:
Who else supports nuclear power and it's expansion?ThomasFremont said:I will not be voting for Trump.
-
I hope you’re not supporting Warren. Along with no coal she is against any nuclear power.ThomasFremont said:I fully support nuclear energy. I’ve stated so numerous times.
-
Oh my, well if the Manhattan Institute says so.
-
You hate to see it.TheKobeStopper said:Oh my, well if the Manhattan Institute says so.
-
Exactly. Nukes have no dem support with the base. Thomas will vote for the fake Indian because that's what children with strong feelings do.
-
What if I like Indians? Bet you didn’t think of that.
-
ThomasFremont said:
What if I like Indians? Bet you didn’t think of that.
@ThomasFremont is a right winger. Who knew?!?