Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Republicans will weep
Comments
-
Napolitano is right, you know.After years of faithless Congresses legally but unconstitutionally ceding power to the presidency, we have arrived where we are today ― a president who spends unappropriated funds, raises taxes, defies courts and changes immigration laws on his own.
Napolitano warned that the same Republicans who are cheering as Trump uses these unconstitutional powers “will weep over it when a Democrat is in the White House.”
Trump is just taking things (considerably) further than Obama did, who took them considerably further than W did, etc.
And the next president is going to take them even further.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Unfortunately, NOFC. -
You are weeping because Trump did what your hero the Zero did. Keep your spilled milk to yourself.2001400ex said: -
Mindlessly following an individual or ideology is FS.dnc said:Napolitano is right, you know.
After years of faithless Congresses legally but unconstitutionally ceding power to the presidency, we have arrived where we are today ― a president who spends unappropriated funds, raises taxes, defies courts and changes immigration laws on his own.
Napolitano warned that the same Republicans who are cheering as Trump uses these unconstitutional powers “will weep over it when a Democrat is in the White House.”
Trump is just taking things (considerably) further than Obama did, who took them considerably further than W did, etc.
And the next president is going to take them even further.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Unfortunately, NOFC.
Politicians are FS. Ends of the bell curve are FS.
FSYFSMFSE -
Trump crossed the Rubicon?dnc said:Napolitano is right, you know.
After years of faithless Congresses legally but unconstitutionally ceding power to the presidency, we have arrived where we are today ― a president who spends unappropriated funds, raises taxes, defies courts and changes immigration laws on his own.
Napolitano warned that the same Republicans who are cheering as Trump uses these unconstitutional powers “will weep over it when a Democrat is in the White House.”
Trump is just taking things (considerably) further than Obama did, who took them considerably further than W did, etc.
And the next president is going to take them even further.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Unfortunately, NOFC.
Congress jumped the shark?
Our system of government is supposed to check each other but when one branch is doing hookers and blow the other two fill the gap. Courts and the White House are running the show
I don't think Trump is unconstitutional because his opponents are trying him up in court on things that people voted in him to do. He's working the angles because he has no party
It's the establishment against the people man -
I like to lose the popular vote (bigly) and claim to have a mandate from the people. InB4 but voter fraud!!!RaceBannon said:
Trump crossed the Rubicon?dnc said:Napolitano is right, you know.
After years of faithless Congresses legally but unconstitutionally ceding power to the presidency, we have arrived where we are today ― a president who spends unappropriated funds, raises taxes, defies courts and changes immigration laws on his own.
Napolitano warned that the same Republicans who are cheering as Trump uses these unconstitutional powers “will weep over it when a Democrat is in the White House.”
Trump is just taking things (considerably) further than Obama did, who took them considerably further than W did, etc.
And the next president is going to take them even further.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Unfortunately, NOFC.
Congress jumped the shark?
Our system of government is supposed to check each other but when one branch is doing hookers and blow the other two fill the gap. Courts and the White House are running the show
I don't think Trump is unconstitutional because his opponents are trying him up in court on things that people voted in him to do. He's working the angles because he has no party
It's the establishment against the people man -
His mandate is his victoryThomasFremont said:
I like to lose the popular vote (bigly) and claim to have a mandate from the people. InB4 but voter fraud!!!RaceBannon said:
Trump crossed the Rubicon?dnc said:Napolitano is right, you know.
After years of faithless Congresses legally but unconstitutionally ceding power to the presidency, we have arrived where we are today ― a president who spends unappropriated funds, raises taxes, defies courts and changes immigration laws on his own.
Napolitano warned that the same Republicans who are cheering as Trump uses these unconstitutional powers “will weep over it when a Democrat is in the White House.”
Trump is just taking things (considerably) further than Obama did, who took them considerably further than W did, etc.
And the next president is going to take them even further.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Unfortunately, NOFC.
Congress jumped the shark?
Our system of government is supposed to check each other but when one branch is doing hookers and blow the other two fill the gap. Courts and the White House are running the show
I don't think Trump is unconstitutional because his opponents are trying him up in court on things that people voted in him to do. He's working the angles because he has no party
It's the establishment against the people man
Hope this helps -
How’s infrastructure week going?RaceBannon said:
His mandate is his victoryThomasFremont said:
I like to lose the popular vote (bigly) and claim to have a mandate from the people. InB4 but voter fraud!!!RaceBannon said:
Trump crossed the Rubicon?dnc said:Napolitano is right, you know.
After years of faithless Congresses legally but unconstitutionally ceding power to the presidency, we have arrived where we are today ― a president who spends unappropriated funds, raises taxes, defies courts and changes immigration laws on his own.
Napolitano warned that the same Republicans who are cheering as Trump uses these unconstitutional powers “will weep over it when a Democrat is in the White House.”
Trump is just taking things (considerably) further than Obama did, who took them considerably further than W did, etc.
And the next president is going to take them even further.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Unfortunately, NOFC.
Congress jumped the shark?
Our system of government is supposed to check each other but when one branch is doing hookers and blow the other two fill the gap. Courts and the White House are running the show
I don't think Trump is unconstitutional because his opponents are trying him up in court on things that people voted in him to do. He's working the angles because he has no party
It's the establishment against the people man
Hope this helps -
Obstruction doesn't win elections
You guys complain about a dictator while mocking a president for not doing things by himself
You're part of the problem
Be part of the solution
The people will vote him in again -
Already calling it for 2020? I don’t know man...depends who he’s up against. If people get out and vote he’s toast.
-
You mean "if all the losers wanting free shit get out and vote he's toast". I translate commie/socialist/prog/lib into actual engrish.ThomasFremont said:Already calling it for 2020? I don’t know man...depends who he’s up against. If people get out and vote he’s toast.
-
What if the ideology centers around joobsPurpleThrobber said:
Mindlessly following an individual or ideology is FS.dnc said:Napolitano is right, you know.
After years of faithless Congresses legally but unconstitutionally ceding power to the presidency, we have arrived where we are today ― a president who spends unappropriated funds, raises taxes, defies courts and changes immigration laws on his own.
Napolitano warned that the same Republicans who are cheering as Trump uses these unconstitutional powers “will weep over it when a Democrat is in the White House.”
Trump is just taking things (considerably) further than Obama did, who took them considerably further than W did, etc.
And the next president is going to take them even further.
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
Unfortunately, NOFC.
Politicians are FS. Ends of the bell curve are FS.
FSYFSMFSE -
Pretty much calling itThomasFremont said:Already calling it for 2020? I don’t know man...depends who he’s up against. If people get out and vote he’s toast.
Trump's base will get out and vote and his base has increased because a lot of GOP types who sat out are coming out
We're looking at who he will be up against which is why I am confident
By 2012 Obama was less popular than he was in 2008 but the GOP didn't do shit for 4 years other than whine and complain. Still haven't come up with a healthcare fix by the way. Re elected
Trump has offered DACA deals, wall deals, infrastructure deals you name it. He's a spend and spend democrat.
Missed opportunity IMO spending three years on a phony collusion smear
Price to pay for that too -
Attempted coup. Prison sentences need to be paid by the treasonous conspirators.RaceBannon said:
Pretty much calling itThomasFremont said:Already calling it for 2020? I don’t know man...depends who he’s up against. If people get out and vote he’s toast.
Trump's base will get out and vote and his base has increased because a lot of GOP types who sat out are coming out
We're looking at who he will be up against which is why I am confident
By 2012 Obama was less popular than he was in 2008 but the GOP didn't do shit for 4 years other than whine and complain. Still haven't come up with a healthcare fix by the way. Re elected
Trump has offered DACA deals, wall deals, infrastructure deals you name it. He's a spend and spend democrat.
Missed opportunity IMO spending three years on a phony collusion smear
Price to pay for that too -
Look, I won’t interrupt the Trump circle jerk, but if you think he’s more popular than before, wow.
-
All the fake news hasn't helped but people dumb enough to watch those channels and believe that crap vote for free shit anyway.ThomasFremont said:Look, I won’t interrupt the Trump circle jerk, but if you think he’s more popular than before, wow.
-
I actually didn't say that. I said that whether he is or not isn't the determining factor and used Obama as an exampleThomasFremont said:Look, I won’t interrupt the Trump circle jerk, but if you think he’s more popular than before, wow.
Dig deeper -
Fine...2016 had the lowest turnout since 94. A lotta people weren’t engaged, assumed Hillary would win, or didn’t like her.RaceBannon said:
I actually didn't say that. I said that whether he is or not isn't the determining factor and used Obama as an exampleThomasFremont said:Look, I won’t interrupt the Trump circle jerk, but if you think he’s more popular than before, wow.
Dig deeper
Say what you want about Trump, but he’s got a LOT of people engaged now. It’s a lot easier to get people to vote against him now that he’s been in the news all day every day for 3+ years than when he was a political outsider. -
People want open borders, bans on straws, meat, air travel and gas cars? Run on that.
-
It's almost like you said this all before, back in 2016, before licking your wounds for the following 2.5 years.ThomasFremont said:Already calling it for 2020? I don’t know man...depends who he’s up against. If people get out and vote he’s toast.
Hope springs eternal. -
The fake news every day. All orchestrated by the democrats. I hope Americans remember that when they vote.ThomasFremont said:
Fine...2016 had the lowest turnout since 94. A lotta people weren’t engaged, assumed Hillary would win, or didn’t like her.RaceBannon said:
I actually didn't say that. I said that whether he is or not isn't the determining factor and used Obama as an exampleThomasFremont said:Look, I won’t interrupt the Trump circle jerk, but if you think he’s more popular than before, wow.
Dig deeper
Say what you want about Trump, but he’s got a LOT of people engaged now. It’s a lot easier to get people to vote against him now that he’s been in the news all day every day for 3+ years than when he was a political outsider. -
What part of lowest turnout since 1994 did you fail to comprehend? If people turn out in more typical numbers, I think he will lose. I don’t know if they will. Probably depends a great deal on who gets the D nomination.TurdBomber said:
It's almost like you said this all before, back in 2016, before licking your wounds for the following 2.5 years.ThomasFremont said:Already calling it for 2020? I don’t know man...depends who he’s up against. If people get out and vote he’s toast.
Hope springs eternal. -
My counter is that people are more likely to vote for someone than against. The hate was real starting in 2015 up to the election that he had no shot to winThomasFremont said:
Fine...2016 had the lowest turnout since 94. A lotta people weren’t engaged, assumed Hillary would win, or didn’t like her.RaceBannon said:
I actually didn't say that. I said that whether he is or not isn't the determining factor and used Obama as an exampleThomasFremont said:Look, I won’t interrupt the Trump circle jerk, but if you think he’s more popular than before, wow.
Dig deeper
Say what you want about Trump, but he’s got a LOT of people engaged now. It’s a lot easier to get people to vote against him now that he’s been in the news all day every day for 3+ years than when he was a political outsider.
You have no reasonable alternative at this point. And @dnc isn't going to give you one
On the other hand a fair number of folks stayed home instead of voting for Trump in 2016
This year they vote according to my anecdotal evidence -
Which candidate can beat Trump? We can all see the problems with Biden, and these problems aren't getting better between now and the election.RaceBannon said:
My counter is that people are more likely to vote for someone than against. The hate was real starting in 2015 up to the election that he had no shot to winThomasFremont said:
Fine...2016 had the lowest turnout since 94. A lotta people weren’t engaged, assumed Hillary would win, or didn’t like her.RaceBannon said:
I actually didn't say that. I said that whether he is or not isn't the determining factor and used Obama as an exampleThomasFremont said:Look, I won’t interrupt the Trump circle jerk, but if you think he’s more popular than before, wow.
Dig deeper
Say what you want about Trump, but he’s got a LOT of people engaged now. It’s a lot easier to get people to vote against him now that he’s been in the news all day every day for 3+ years than when he was a political outsider.
You have no reasonable alternative at this point. And @dnc isn't going to give you one
On the other hand a fair number of folks stayed home instead of voting for Trump in 2016
This year they vote according to my anecdotal evidence
Warren is so far left that Trump will have a field day making her defend her policies, same with Bernie. So who do you think is going to win the nomination? -
No clue who gets the nomination. I’m on the Yang Gang for the record. But I recognize he is on the outside looking in still. Trending up though as others are moving down and dropping out, so maybe there’s a chance...
-
Yang has no chance of winning the nomination. You're looking at Biden, Warren, or Bernie. Amy K could win it but she isn't getting the nomination either.ThomasFremont said:No clue who gets the nomination. I’m on the Yang Gang for the record. But I recognize he is on the outside looking in still. Trending up though as others are moving down and dropping out, so maybe there’s a chance...
Unless Biden has a complete public mental meltdown he'll hold onto a enough support to win a split field. He has the black vote which doesn't help him in Iowa or NH but everything in SC. -
I agree with this.ThomasFremont said:
Fine...2016 had the lowest turnout since 94. A lotta people weren’t engaged, assumed Hillary would win, or didn’t like her.RaceBannon said:
I actually didn't say that. I said that whether he is or not isn't the determining factor and used Obama as an exampleThomasFremont said:Look, I won’t interrupt the Trump circle jerk, but if you think he’s more popular than before, wow.
Dig deeper
Say what you want about Trump, but he’s got a LOT of people engaged now. It’s a lot easier to get people to vote against him now that he’s been in the news all day every day for 3+ years than when he was a political outsider. -
Trump alienated a lot of the traditional GOP base with his rhetoric but managed to split the Dem base. This is part of low turnout.
Most of the GOP is solidly on board with his policy work and judge appointments at this point and is also vehemently opposed to the progressives currently threatening to pull ahead in the DNC.
The Dem base is still split. Progressives won't vote Biden or Hillary(2016) and we've yet to see if moderates will vote full on progressive. Imo they won't. -
Well I agree with thisUW_Doog_Bot said:Trump alienated a lot of the traditional GOP base with his rhetoric but managed to split the Dem base. This is part of low turnout.
Most of the GOP is solidly on board with his policy work and judge appointments at this point and is also vehemently opposed to the progressives currently threatening to pull ahead in the DNC.
The Dem base is still split. Progressives won't vote Biden or Hillary(2016) and we've yet to see if moderates will vote full on progressive. Imo they won't. -
Freshened up for the middle.RaceBannon said:Obstruction doesn't win elections
You guys complain about a dictator while mocking a president for not doing things by himself
You're part of the problem
Be part of the solution
The people willvote him in againNOT vote in another shit leftist Dem candidate
Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if Trump pulls even greater electoral numbers this time around.
-
UW_Doog_Bot said:
Trump alienated a lot of the traditional GOP base with his rhetoric but managed to split the Dem base. This is part of low turnout.
Most of the GOP is solidly on board with his policy work and judge appointments at this point and is also vehemently opposed to the progressives currently threatening to pull ahead in the DNC.
The Dem base is still split. Progressives won't vote Biden or Hillary(2016) and we've yet to see if moderates will vote full on progressive. Imo they won't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKsxPW6i3pM
They won't.
