Interesting Recruiting Statistic

FremontTroll said:

DoogCourics said:

FremontTroll said:

DoogCourics said:

bigcc said:

They have gotten 3 recruits who had UW offers

So not technically correct, but would easily take our 4 without a second thought

Fair. They had UW offers, but not a situation where it was down to the final two schools.

Our 4 were all down to a basic final two head-to-head and UW came up Aces.

DoogCourics said:

bigcc said:

They have gotten 3 recruits who had UW offers

So not technically correct, but would easily take our 4 without a second thought

Fair. They had UW offers, but not a situation where it was down to the final two schools.

Our 4 were all down to a basic final two head-to-head and UW came up Aces.

So Oklahoma can get their hat on the table for west coast kids and we can’t for Texas kids. Ok?

Missing my point. Sure, we never even got in a straight up final 2 battle for a Texas kid against Oklahoma, but I'm not really wanting to jump back into the Texas recruiting fiasco from the other day when I posted Caple's article anyway.

The 3 OU commits who had UW offers never had UW in their final 2. UW was eliminated relatively early on.

The 4 UW commits who had OU offers literally had UW vs OU as their top 2 in a head-to-head battle.

In the straight up battles, UW has come out 4-0. I don't give a fuck if they're west coast kids or not. Why UW isn't getting into a final 2 with Oklahoma over Texas recruits is a different conversation entirely. Take it back to that thread and hash it out with Tequilla and DoogBot.

I didn’t miss your point. We have the advantage for west coast kids and we held serve. They held serve in Texas. There were no neutral battles.