Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Preseason all pac 12

2»

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    PFF does some analytics but the base of most of their stuff is eye test. They present it as objective data but it's highly highly subjective.

    I like PFF and appreciate their existence but I don't consider most of what they do analytics.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    PFF does some analytics but the base of most of their stuff is eye test. They present it as objective data but it's highly highly subjective.

    I like PFF and appreciate their existence but I don't consider most of what they do analytics.
    Bingo. PFF is fun if they say something nice about our(?) guys but that's about as much as they're worth. Imagine the manpower it would take to breakdown (65P5 x 100plays x 22players) weekly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PHD_Dawg
    PHD_Dawg Member Posts: 154
    dnc said:

    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    PFF does some analytics but the base of most of their stuff is eye test. They present it as objective data but it's highly highly subjective.

    I like PFF and appreciate their existence but I don't consider most of what they do analytics.
    Maybe analytics isnt the right phrasing per se, but their people do have specific criteria for compiling data. It's not like they are just winging it. And iirc their services are purchased by most/all NFL teams
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    PHD_Dawg said:

    dnc said:

    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    PFF does some analytics but the base of most of their stuff is eye test. They present it as objective data but it's highly highly subjective.

    I like PFF and appreciate their existence but I don't consider most of what they do analytics.
    Maybe analytics isnt the right phrasing per se, but their people do have specific criteria for compiling data. It's not like they are just winging it. And iirc their services are purchased by most/all NFL teams
    Enjoy the fuck out of it then.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter