Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Preseason all pac 12

PHD_DawgPHD_Dawg Member Posts: 154
in Hardcore Husky Board
Why is Trey Adams behind a dude who played half the year?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • dtddtd Member Posts: 5,106 Standard Supporter
    huh?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Simple, one has healthy back while other dosent
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PHD_DawgPHD_Dawg Member Posts: 154
    dtd said:

    huh?

    https://www.pff.com/news/college-pff-preseason-2019-all-pac-12-team
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallzBallz Member Posts: 4,735
    PFF has lost my respect with their over hyping of Oregon's O-line. Those guys are basic as fuck and will get embarrassed against Auburn and UW.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtddtd Member Posts: 5,106 Standard Supporter
    https://pac-12.com/article/2019/07/22/media-selects-preseason-pac-12-all-conference-football-team
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    WGAS. We're going to clean up once again come postseason, we just have too many new bodies to gain traction in the useless preseason lists.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PHD_DawgPHD_Dawg Member Posts: 154
    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,949 Swaye's Wigwam
    Ballz said:

    PFF has lost my respect with their over hyping of Oregon's O-line. Those guys are basic as fuck and will get embarrassed against Auburn and UW.

    PFF is playing Auburn and UW???
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,124 Swaye's Wigwam
    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    What did they pick for Justin Herbert last year?

    Case closed
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,816
    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    PFF does some analytics but the base of most of their stuff is eye test. They present it as objective data but it's highly highly subjective.

    I like PFF and appreciate their existence but I don't consider most of what they do analytics.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    PFF does some analytics but the base of most of their stuff is eye test. They present it as objective data but it's highly highly subjective.

    I like PFF and appreciate their existence but I don't consider most of what they do analytics.
    Bingo. PFF is fun if they say something nice about our(?) guys but that's about as much as they're worth. Imagine the manpower it would take to breakdown (65P5 x 100plays x 22players) weekly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PHD_DawgPHD_Dawg Member Posts: 154
    dnc said:

    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    PFF does some analytics but the base of most of their stuff is eye test. They present it as objective data but it's highly highly subjective.

    I like PFF and appreciate their existence but I don't consider most of what they do analytics.
    Maybe analytics isnt the right phrasing per se, but their people do have specific criteria for compiling data. It's not like they are just winging it. And iirc their services are purchased by most/all NFL teams
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    PHD_Dawg said:

    dnc said:

    PHD_Dawg said:

    HuskyJW said:

    Those aren’t real awards

    HTH

    I know HH doesnt put much weight into #data and #anylitics

    But PFF has been arguably the best public football analytics site for like 10 years. Footballoutsiders is really the only other place that has a similar track record and lifespan
    PFF does some analytics but the base of most of their stuff is eye test. They present it as objective data but it's highly highly subjective.

    I like PFF and appreciate their existence but I don't consider most of what they do analytics.
    Maybe analytics isnt the right phrasing per se, but their people do have specific criteria for compiling data. It's not like they are just winging it. And iirc their services are purchased by most/all NFL teams
    Enjoy the fuck out of it then.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.