SNOPES VERIFIED!!!

She isn't allowed in, but an 8 year old girl can walk out alone at any point she chooses.

Nice.

Bendintheriver said:

Anyone who uses Snopes for "fact checking" is wasting their time.

Snopes...true?

creepycoug said:

Bendintheriver said:

Anyone who uses Snopes for "fact checking" is wasting their time.

I'll check in with Alex Jones.com instead.

So you will have two sources that are bullshit.

That makes you a know nothing idiot.

Try thinking for yourself

Do You Trust Snopes? You Won’t After Reading This.


https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-reading-how-they-work-with-monsanto-operatives/

You are better than using a logical fallacy to make a point.

From Real Clear politics:


“While Snopes deserves credit for its “just the facts, ma’am” approach to selecting its subjects, we have observed anecdotally that Snopes writers are in the habit of injecting editorial language or opinions into their fact checks. For instance, they called an unproven claim on knife crimes in London “heavy on Islam-blaming but light on evidence.” They labeled a questionable article on supposed “animal brothels” in Germany a “transparent attempt to spark fear and hatred.”

In evaluating a false conspiracy theory about Parkland shooting activist David Hogg, they added the extraneous commentary that “Hogg has been the target of a series of smears promoted by far-right blogs attempting to discredit him and his activist efforts for gun safety.” Elsewhere, Snopes exclaimed about the “increasingly hysterical tone” of Hogg’s “would-be smear campaigners.” And the site regularly calls the proprietor of a network of hoax news sites a “notorious purveyor of fake news who… operates a network of web sites including As American As Apple Pie and Freedum Junkshun, all of which claim to produce ‘satire.’” This is by no means an inclusive list. The reader need only pick a few Snopes pieces at random to find such charged language. “

PurpleThrobber said:

creepycoug said:

Bendintheriver said:

Anyone who uses Snopes for "fact checking" is wasting their time.

I'll check in with Alex Jones.com instead.

I'm not saying you should Bing image search "Alex Jones hot" but I'm not saying you shouldn't either.....

So should I or not?! God damn you throbber!

Although I can't blame the throbber. I gave the accountant my flash drive to transfer the shit over

And I said just do yourself a favor and reformat it. Don't look at it

dflea said:

Yes. Nothing screams facts, truth and reliability like dailycaller or foodbabe.

lol

Using logical fallacies to present an argument is ignorant AND lazy. Are you buffoons capable of rational debate. Don’t answer that. It’s rhetorical because the answer is sadly true.............you are not.😂😂

Obviously from a place that provided a lot better education that was provided you dumbfucks in your k-12 government indoctrination centers.

You are completely unaware that you are tangentially presenting another Logical Fallacy. What a ignorant moron.

Selective Outrage from Democrats Ignores Reality of Obama-Era Migrant Detentions

https://www.breitbart.com/border/2019/07/02/selective-outrage-from-democrats-ignores-reality-of-obama-era-migrant-detentions/

DJDuck said:

Pitchfork51 said:

DJDuck said:

Obviously from a place that provided a lot better education that was provided you dumbfuck s in your k-12 government indoctrination centers. You are completely unaware that you are tangentially presenting another Logical Fallacy. What a ignorant moron.

Who the fuck do you think you are talking to lol

You are so stupid you can’t even identify when you are being addressed. You are the only logical fallacy using, lazy fucking moron I’m talking to right now moron.

Sad...