Trump at the DMZ - Tonight, 10:30pm
Comments
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/30/world/asia/trump-kim-north-korea-negotiations.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
Change Trump to Obama in this article and holy shit conservatives would lose it. Looks like all those giant love letters from Kim are having their desired effect. -
Have you noticed who's President today?GDS said:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/30/world/asia/trump-kim-north-korea-negotiations.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
Change Trump to Obama in this article and holy shit conservatives would lose it. Looks like all those giant love letters from Kim are having their desired effect.
NOGAF what cons think about Obama anymore. -
Said without a hint of self awareness or irony.TurdBomber said:
Have you noticed who's President today?GDS said:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/30/world/asia/trump-kim-north-korea-negotiations.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
Change Trump to Obama in this article and holy shit conservatives would lose it. Looks like all those giant love letters from Kim are having their desired effect.
NOGAF what cons think about Obama anymore. -
Original. You can stop plagiarizing other posters any time, dumbass.HHusky said:
Said without a hint of self awareness or irony.TurdBomber said:
Have you noticed who's President today?GDS said:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/30/world/asia/trump-kim-north-korea-negotiations.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
Change Trump to Obama in this article and holy shit conservatives would lose it. Looks like all those giant love letters from Kim are having their desired effect.
NOGAF what cons think about Obama anymore. -
JFC you’re an idiot.ApostleofGrief said:
Well, it's true. You guys are too dumb to have a debate with. You think a strongman president is like a football coach. The reality is that works fine in football, but what it gets you in government is tyranny. to run a football team like a democratic republic government the players would be able to appoint the coaches and the entire infrastructure power.MikeDamone said:
Hell of an argument you made there.ApostleofGrief said:
GROW. A. BRAIN.DHD said:The "legitimization" argument is always confusing to me.
Is it supposed to go like this:
If the US ignores Kim, that makes him illegitimate.
If he's illegitimate then the missiles are illegitimate also.
And, if he's illegitimate and the missiles are illegitimate, then the nuke tests are illegitimate too.
And, if all of those things are illegitimate, then they aren't deadly and aren't a threat.
And, if all of the above is true, somedeay Kim will wake up and say "hey, I must not be legit, so I'll just go away quietly".
And ... problem solved.
Is that how the "legitimization" argument is supposed to work?
Because that sounds more like "pretending" than it does an actual foreign policy strategy.
Ha! It works! -
Yep. I fully expect Turd to drop a Hillary or Obama reference several times in his/her next 50 posts.HHusky said:
Said without a hint of self awareness or irony.TurdBomber said:
Have you noticed who's President today?GDS said:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/30/world/asia/trump-kim-north-korea-negotiations.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
Change Trump to Obama in this article and holy shit conservatives would lose it. Looks like all those giant love letters from Kim are having their desired effect.
NOGAF what cons think about Obama anymore. -
Your a looserMikeDamone said:
JFC you’re an idiot.ApostleofGrief said:
Well, it's true. You guys are too dumb to have a debate with. You think a strongman president is like a football coach. The reality is that works fine in football, but what it gets you in government is tyranny. to run a football team like a democratic republic government the players would be able to appoint the coaches and the entire infrastructure power.MikeDamone said:
Hell of an argument you made there.ApostleofGrief said:
GROW. A. BRAIN.DHD said:The "legitimization" argument is always confusing to me.
Is it supposed to go like this:
If the US ignores Kim, that makes him illegitimate.
If he's illegitimate then the missiles are illegitimate also.
And, if he's illegitimate and the missiles are illegitimate, then the nuke tests are illegitimate too.
And, if all of those things are illegitimate, then they aren't deadly and aren't a threat.
And, if all of the above is true, somedeay Kim will wake up and say "hey, I must not be legit, so I'll just go away quietly".
And ... problem solved.
Is that how the "legitimization" argument is supposed to work?
Because that sounds more like "pretending" than it does an actual foreign policy strategy.
Ha! It works! -
I remember when the left was “terrified” that we were going to get “nuked” by NK because Trump is a big meany pants. Or maybe they weren’t actually terrified and that was just the cool thing to pretend to care about on a Facebook that day.
-
You girls have lots of misty, water-colored memories.CuntWaffle said:I remember when the left was “terrified” that we were going to get “nuked” by NK because Trump is a big meany pants. Or maybe they weren’t actually terrified and that was just the cool thing to pretend to care about on a Facebook that day.
-
Thanks for reading!HHusky said:
You girls have lots of misty, water-colored memories.CuntWaffle said:I remember when the left was “terrified” that we were going to get “nuked” by NK because Trump is a big meany pants. Or maybe they weren’t actually terrified and that was just the cool thing to pretend to care about on a Facebook that day.
