Trump at the DMZ - Tonight, 10:30pm

DHD

Sounds like Little Rocket Man is going to meet him there.

Will be the first sitting President to meet the NK leader at the DMZ.

Might be worth tuning in.

GDS

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

pawz

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

ApostleofGrief

Hitler Mussolini part duex

GDS

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

pawz

ApostleofGrief said:

Hitler Mussolini part duex

TDS skrong

pawz

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

DJDuck

Whatever the opinions, this is Historic.



Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner in attendance

RaceBannon

Good news for America

Bad news for Democrats

ApostleofGrief

RaceBannon said:

Good news for America

Bad news for Democrats

It's good news for dictators

RaceBannon

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

Good news for America

Bad news for Democrats

It's good news for dictators

Just last week Trump needed to be a part of the International Community

Now he doesn't? Democrats never wanted peace in Korea?

Maddy Albright didn't bow the Kim IL

Staff?? True??

Hell Kerry has been in Iran several times this year sucking up to the Mullahs. The Iran Deal was the BEST deal ever

Fuck off

MikeDamone

Leftists 2017 “OMG Trump is going to start a nuclear war with N Korea!”

Leftists 2019 “OMG Trump is making peace with a dictator!”

This is how I know leftists are full of shit

ApostleofGrief

RaceBannon said:

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

Good news for America

Bad news for Democrats

It's good news for dictators

Just last week Trump needed to be a part of the International Community

Now he doesn't? Democrats never wanted peace in Korea?

Maddy Albright didn't bow the Kim IL

Staff?? True??

Hell Kerry has been in Iran several times this year sucking up to the Mullahs. The Iran Deal was the BEST deal ever

Fuck off

You like dictators. You want a far right dictator. You got one. Congratulations!

RaceBannon

Panicked at the thought of success

Pitiful

RaceBannon

RaceBannon

RaceBannon

pawz

MikeDamone said:

Leftists 2017 “OMG Trump is going to start a nuclear war with N Korea!”

Leftists 2019 “OMG Trump is making peace with a dictator!”

This is how I know leftists are full of shit

Exactly fucking this.


And leftists wonder why we? can't take them seriously.

*leftist pounds fist on table*

2001400ex

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

Looking thru the October 16 lense. If this were Obama. You'd call him a communist for meeting with a communist. But it's Trump so you now jerk off to him bowing to a communist.

pawz

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

Looking thru the October 16 lense. If this were Obama. You'd call him a communist for meeting with a communist. But it's Trump so you now jerk off to him bowing to a communist.

Run outside and play. It's summer time, you can't sit in the house all day.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

Looking thru the October 16 lense. If this were Obama. You'd call him a communist for meeting with a communist. But it's Trump so you now jerk off to him bowing to a communist.

I wouldn’t call him a communist for meeting with a communist, I’d call him one because he’s a communist

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

Looking thru the October 16 lense. If this were Obama. You'd call him a communist for meeting with a communist. But it's Trump so you now jerk off to him bowing to a communist.

I wouldn’t call him a communist for meeting with a communist, I’d call him one because he’s a communist

Well through your lense. Trump is a communist too. So there's that.

MikeDamone

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

Looking thru the October 16 lense. If this were Obama. You'd call him a communist for meeting with a communist. But it's Trump so you now jerk off to him bowing to a communist.

I wouldn’t call him a communist for meeting with a communist, I’d call him one because he’s a communist

Well through your lense. Trump is a communist too. So there's that.

No I don’t. Idiot.

2001400ex

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

MikeDamone said:

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

Looking thru the October 16 lense. If this were Obama. You'd call him a communist for meeting with a communist. But it's Trump so you now jerk off to him bowing to a communist.

I wouldn’t call him a communist for meeting with a communist, I’d call him one because he’s a communist

Well through your lense. Trump is a communist too. So there's that.

No I don’t. Idiot.

You don't what?

ApostleofGrief

RaceBannon said:

Panicked at the thought of success

Pitiful

Two obese dictators sucking dicks

GDS

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

So you’re saying in your opinion it’s working. Why hedge in your first post? What results? Fancy photo ops with the man Trump said he “fell in love with” don’t seem like tangible results that benefit our country. If they gave up almost all their enriched uranium, most of their centrifuges, closed enrichment facilities and agreed to 24/7 monitoring now those would be positive results for our country.

pawz

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

So you’re saying in your opinion it’s working. Why hedge in your first post? What results? Fancy photo ops with the man Trump said he “fell in love with” don’t seem like tangible results that benefit our country. If they gave up almost all their enriched uranium, most of their centrifuges, closed enrichment facilities and agreed to 24/7 monitoring now those would be positive results for our country.

I'm hearing Rome was built in a day.

That's just what I'm hearing. Don't twist.

Sledog

2001400ex said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

pawz said:

GDS said:

Will they be exchanging giant oversized love letters?

I'm not saying the diplomacy is working so don't twist.

But I fail to see the benefit of mocking that which is a step in the right direction by any measure.

How can you differentiate between “clearly a step in the right direction “ and “I’m not saying it’s working “? If you think it’s clearly a step in the right direction then of course you think it’s working. I don’t think it’s either.

Simple. Results matter.

a) differences are far from settled

b) if looked at from Oct '16 lense, it would have been thought impressive

Looking thru the October 16 lense. If this were Obama. You'd call him a communist for meeting with a communist. But it's Trump so you now jerk off to him bowing to a communist.

he was a stuff admitted communist socialist Marxist. Maybe you should read his books.

Oh and fuck of you lying bag of pussy and assholes.

LebamDawg

I would like to see an agreement with NK that costs us only 150 billion or so and then NK can just ignore the agreement and develop their nuclear capabilities. Just like Iran. Just like Obama. including our allies, just like Obama. Maybe when Sanders gets elected

TurdBomber

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

Good news for America

Bad news for Democrats

It's good news for dictators

Hey look: Another MSM Parrot.

ApostleofGrief

ApostleofGrief said:

RaceBannon said:

Panicked at the thought of success

Pitiful

Two obese dictators sucking dicks

You assholes should downvote this. Mr race banning says it's pathetic. Yes, applauding a far right dictator sucking dicks with a far left dictator. It's the fucking lemonparty with our president. Pathetic.