I would like to officially welcome Kamala Harris to the presidential race

Comments
-
Fuck you’re stupid. It ain’t her genitalia, fool. It’s her politics.
When will you Libtard Hypocrites realize that it’s not all about genitalia?
Apparently never. Good luck in 2020. -
She's worthless. No experience hasn't done anything but bang her way into jobs. Great resume.
-
Lest we forget her strong support for Jussie Smollett during his fake hate crime hoax.Sledog said:She's worthless. No experience hasn't done anything but bang her way into jobs. Great resume.
-
She needs to defend her policy directive to incarcerate the parents of truant kids.allpurpleallgold said:The nutters @Houhusky and @Sledog have started talking about sex tapes and her sexual history, while @TurdBomber is making silly claims about how she can’t win regions because she has a vagina. These are the signs that the Republican Party is taking you seriously.
A policy that overwhelmingly, negatively impacts disadvantaged poor colored folk.
I don't have kids (yet), but I can only imagine working 2 or 3 jobs to make ends meet and having a police officer on my front door wanting to take me away b/c my kid won't go to school.
A horrifying scenario that only makes things worse.
-
It’s weird that it has nothing to do with her being a woman but you went out of you way to include her being a woman as a reason to why the Midwest won’t vote for her.TurdBomber said:
The Mid-West ain’t voting for a SF Liberal woman under any circumstances.jecornel said:I think Kamala will appeal to a lot of people. She is similar to Trump in the sense of thinking her shit don't stink.
She finds herself to be very special.
But I hope the Dems keep believing they will.
The Pyre in November 2020 will be amazing. -
You’re absolutely right. I shouldn’t presume the gender of anyone from SF.allpurpleallgold said:
It’s weird that it has nothing to do with her being a woman but you went out of you way to include her being a woman as a reason to why the Midwest won’t vote for her.TurdBomber said:
The Mid-West ain’t voting for a SF Liberal woman under any circumstances.jecornel said:I think Kamala will appeal to a lot of people. She is similar to Trump in the sense of thinking her shit don't stink.
She finds herself to be very special.
But I hope the Dems keep believing they will.
The Pyre in November 2020 will be amazing. -
Delivery too staged
-
15 years ago I would have given her a jerb if she would have banged me. So I really can't hold that against her.
-
I'm sure she'd love killing pests.Swaye said:15 years ago I would have given her a jerb if she would have banged me. So I really can't hold that against her.
-
I am on record as having predicted that Head Board Bangin' Harris would be one of the two finalists when all was said and done. She got where she is the old fashioned way, she slept her way to the top. But what is even more slimy is who she was banging. He was the most corrupt politician that state has ever seen and she knew it. He even gave her two positions at the same time so that she could fraudulently collect two salaries from the tax payers of that state.
Your comment APAG is kind of funny when you think about it. The first thing racist democrats see is her black skin, then they realize that black skin is on an attractive woman and you are all in regardless of her character or her accomplishments or the fact that she repeatedly played the skin flute of the most corrupt politician the state has ever seen. She is so slimy she should not even be on that stage. So before you go accusing others of being sexist you might do a little soul searching yourself. -
Imagine being so excited when thinking about a Kampala Harris sex tape and slamming the cons; you start a new thread and tag someone in it who has no idea what the fuck you are talking about, all to parrot some Facebook boomer hot-take about republicans being sexist or something.allpurpleallgold said:The nutters @Houhusky and @Sledog have started talking about sex tapes and her sexual history, while @TurdBomber is making silly claims about how she can’t win regions because she has a vagina. These are the signs that the Republican Party is taking you seriously.
-
I didn't think Kamala Harris would be a threat to Trump. The way the village idiots have responded to this thread has me reconsidering.
-
If you had an original name this wouldn’t have happened.Houhusky said:
Imagine being so excited when thinking about a Kampala Harris sex tape and slamming the cons; you start a new thread and tag someone in it who has no idea what the fuck you are talking about, all to parrot some Facebook boomer hot-take about republicans being sexist or something.allpurpleallgold said:The nutters @Houhusky and @Sledog have started talking about sex tapes and her sexual history, while @TurdBomber is making silly claims about how she can’t win regions because she has a vagina. These are the signs that the Republican Party is taking you seriously.
@HoustonHusky -
Libs like you spent the last 3 years drooling over fake pee tapes, fake Russian hooker tapes, and Stormy Daniels, and yet somehow after that you think throwing in actual real material into the Presidential Election won't be complete comedy? Especially with Trump getting to comment on it?allpurpleallgold said:The nutters @Houhusky and @Sledog have started talking about sex tapes and her sexual history, while @TurdBomber is making silly claims about how she can’t win regions because she has a vagina. These are the signs that the Republican Party is taking you seriously.
You can't invent reality TV that would beat this...
-
The Throbber is not happy @Sledog and @HoustonHusky went down the sex tape path without his approval.
#wheelhouse
-
Harris position on providing illegals with health insurance and her flip flopping on getting rid of private health insurance doomed her in any general election.
-
APAG just doesn't know enough about Harris yet. All the progressives in CA hate her for various reasons. That's pretty much the only base she has nationally a chance to appeal to. I'd expect her to be about as successful as McGovern was.GreenRiverGatorz said:I didn't think Kamala Harris would be a threat to Trump. The way the village idiots have responded to this thread has me reconsidering.
-
-
@PurpleThrobber would like to have a word.TurdBomber said:Fuck you’re stupid. It ain’t her genitalia, fool. It’s her politics.
When will you Libtard Hypocrites realize that it’s not all about genitalia?
Apparently never. Good luck in 2020.
-
I don't the Willi
Every one of them have that positionSFGbob said:Harris position on providing illegals with health insurance and her flip flopping on getting rid of private health insurance doomed her in any general election.
Trump is going to win. I just think she's the best shot -
I think she's a light weight myself, but let me ask you this: do you think the current President has a moral compass that reads true north better than Harris'? I thought the whole thing on Trump was, "you can't focus on who he is, you have to focus on what he does."Bendintheriver said:I am on record as having predicted that Head Board Bangin' Harris would be one of the two finalists when all was said and done. She got where she is the old fashioned way, she slept her way to the top. But what is even more slimy is who she was banging. He was the most corrupt politician that state has ever seen and she knew it. He even gave her two positions at the same time so that she could fraudulently collect two salaries from the tax payers of that state.
Your comment APAG is kind of funny when you think about it. The first thing racist democrats see is her black skin, then they realize that black skin is on an attractive woman and you are all in regardless of her character or her accomplishments or the fact that she repeatedly played the skin flute of the most corrupt politician the state has ever seen. She is so slimy she should not even be on that stage. So before you go accusing others of being sexist you might do a little soul searching yourself.
I don't have the partisan shill disease, so don't go twistin': Trump doesn't bother me. But you have to be Jay Inslee retarded to not see that he's not a good guy, and that 98% of all the shit that's said about him from the past is probably true. Not Russian and collusion and all that shit. The stuff that even clear-thinking hard right wingers will agree make him a shit human being.
Given that is who is the current POTUS, does any of that about Harris really matter? If she's an opportunistic whore, then he's a lying, cheating, immoral, insecure, shady, half-ass business man. But if he makes the right calls as POTUS, do we care? -
I'd still hit it.Swaye said:15 years ago I would have given her a jerb if she would have banged me. So I really can't hold that against her.
-
It should be entertaining watching the about face many on the left make in the name of ideology.creepycoug said:
I think she's a light weight myself, but let me ask you this: do you think the current President has a moral compass that reads true north better than Harris'? I thought the whole thing on Trump was, "you can't focus on who he is, you have to focus on what he does."Bendintheriver said:I am on record as having predicted that Head Board Bangin' Harris would be one of the two finalists when all was said and done. She got where she is the old fashioned way, she slept her way to the top. But what is even more slimy is who she was banging. He was the most corrupt politician that state has ever seen and she knew it. He even gave her two positions at the same time so that she could fraudulently collect two salaries from the tax payers of that state.
Your comment APAG is kind of funny when you think about it. The first thing racist democrats see is her black skin, then they realize that black skin is on an attractive woman and you are all in regardless of her character or her accomplishments or the fact that she repeatedly played the skin flute of the most corrupt politician the state has ever seen. She is so slimy she should not even be on that stage. So before you go accusing others of being sexist you might do a little soul searching yourself.
I don't have the partisan shill disease, so don't go twistin': Trump doesn't bother me. But you have to be Jay Inslee retarded to not see that he's not a good guy, and that 98% of all the shit that's said about him from the past is probably true. Not Russian and collusion and all that shit. The stuff that even clear-thinking hard right wingers will agree make him a shit human being.
Given that is who is the current POTUS, does any of that about Harris really matter? If she's an opportunistic whore, then he's a lying, cheating, immoral, insecure, shady, half-ass business man. But if he makes the right calls as POTUS, do we care? -
Well saidcreepycoug said:
I think she's a light weight myself, but let me ask you this: do you think the current President has a moral compass that reads true north better than Harris'? I thought the whole thing on Trump was, "you can't focus on who he is, you have to focus on what he does."Bendintheriver said:I am on record as having predicted that Head Board Bangin' Harris would be one of the two finalists when all was said and done. She got where she is the old fashioned way, she slept her way to the top. But what is even more slimy is who she was banging. He was the most corrupt politician that state has ever seen and she knew it. He even gave her two positions at the same time so that she could fraudulently collect two salaries from the tax payers of that state.
Your comment APAG is kind of funny when you think about it. The first thing racist democrats see is her black skin, then they realize that black skin is on an attractive woman and you are all in regardless of her character or her accomplishments or the fact that she repeatedly played the skin flute of the most corrupt politician the state has ever seen. She is so slimy she should not even be on that stage. So before you go accusing others of being sexist you might do a little soul searching yourself.
I don't have the partisan shill disease, so don't go twistin': Trump doesn't bother me. But you have to be Jay Inslee retarded to not see that he's not a good guy, and that 98% of all the shit that's said about him from the past is probably true. Not Russian and collusion and all that shit. The stuff that even clear-thinking hard right wingers will agree make him a shit human being.
Given that is who is the current POTUS, does any of that about Harris really matter? If she's an opportunistic whore, then he's a lying, cheating, immoral, insecure, shady, half-ass business man. But if he makes the right calls as POTUS, do we care? -
creepycoug said:
@PurpleThrobber would like to have a word.TurdBomber said:Fuck you’re stupid. It ain’t her genitalia, fool. It’s her politics.
When will you Libtard Hypocrites realize that it’s not all about genitalia?
Apparently never. Good luck in 2020.
-
I voted for Trump. Hillary is the devil and corrupt as hell as a politician. She enriched herself at the expense of the country and has been caught lying while in office and the WH so many times the list would cover this page. I am no fan of Trump the human being and I have continually held that belief but he was the lesser of two evils. So your point does not make sense when you take the circumstances of the election into account.creepycoug said:
I think she's a light weight myself, but let me ask you this: do you think the current President has a moral compass that reads true north better than Harris'? I thought the whole thing on Trump was, "you can't focus on who he is, you have to focus on what he does."Bendintheriver said:I am on record as having predicted that Head Board Bangin' Harris would be one of the two finalists when all was said and done. She got where she is the old fashioned way, she slept her way to the top. But what is even more slimy is who she was banging. He was the most corrupt politician that state has ever seen and she knew it. He even gave her two positions at the same time so that she could fraudulently collect two salaries from the tax payers of that state.
Your comment APAG is kind of funny when you think about it. The first thing racist democrats see is her black skin, then they realize that black skin is on an attractive woman and you are all in regardless of her character or her accomplishments or the fact that she repeatedly played the skin flute of the most corrupt politician the state has ever seen. She is so slimy she should not even be on that stage. So before you go accusing others of being sexist you might do a little soul searching yourself.
I don't have the partisan shill disease, so don't go twistin': Trump doesn't bother me. But you have to be Jay Inslee retarded to not see that he's not a good guy, and that 98% of all the shit that's said about him from the past is probably true. Not Russian and collusion and all that shit. The stuff that even clear-thinking hard right wingers will agree make him a shit human being.
Given that is who is the current POTUS, does any of that about Harris really matter? If she's an opportunistic whore, then he's a lying, cheating, immoral, insecure, shady, half-ass business man. But if he makes the right calls as POTUS, do we care?
Less important than my first point, because keeping that bitch of a human being out of office was most important, I was curious what a business person could do in office instead of this steady stream of no real world experience idiots who are life long politicians.
KH is a politician. A career politician. A woman who stole money from the California taxpayers and used her body to get ahead in the game through banging the most corrupt politician ever in California. She knew exactly what kind of politician he was and she was rewarded for her behavior by that corrupt asshole. We should never reward corrupt politicians by putting them in the WH. Ever. There is a choice here and to ignore past behavior while in some political office is a big time error on the part of voters.
I do care if corrupt life long politicians are able to remain in office and run for the WH. Everyone should. I will give Trump this, thus far he has not stolen from tax payers and abused his position for personal enrichment. KH has. Hence my problem with her. She can't be trusted. -
I'd bone kamala
-
#MeToo
I like strong women who scare me a little -
You haven't? I thought everyone had.Pitchfork51 said:I'd bone kamala
-
Put is this way: every one of them feels like they need to fall in line and have that position, whether they agree with it or not. The "raise your hand" thing was fucking stupid ... who's not going to raise their hand?RaceBannon said:I don't the Willi
Every one of them have that positionSFGbob said:Harris position on providing illegals with health insurance and her flip flopping on getting rid of private health insurance doomed her in any general election.
Trump is going to win. I just think she's the best shot
The irony is that they got some guy named "Jose" to axe a bunch of immigration questions and set a tone for "immigration is our #1" issue, when in reality it's not our? #1 issue, and they did it in Miami, presumably because there are a bunch of Hispans down there. But, someone forgot to check with the Bush family. They could have advised the DNC that 95% of those Hispans are as elitist as a New England boarding school white boy and don't want to let "just anybody" in the country; and 99% of that 95% are died-in-the-wool Republicans and are harder on socialism and big government than any of the pretend Patriots here in the Tug.
Trust me: those are my people. I know what they really think of the other people. They're no more interested in letting in a bunch of immigrants from central America than a redneck from the Willamette value. Cubans generally think (well, we? know) that they're better than the rest of Latin America and closer to Mother Spain that the rest.