Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Gabbard

«1

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Wood

    I’d probably stick with mish.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    She has no shot
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,073
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    I missed her. I’ll guarantee she didn’t embarrass herself. She’s the real deal. So she has no shot.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913


    That's funny.

    Blue state
    If we needed any other proof that @Swaye is now a kept man, it arrived tonight.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839


    That's funny.

    Blue state
    Indian Territory, duh
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,884 Founders Club
    dnc said:


    That's funny.

    Blue state
    Indian Territory, duh
    Even gramps got that one
  • GrandpaSankey
    GrandpaSankey Member Posts: 958

    dnc said:


    That's funny.

    Blue state
    Indian Territory, duh
    Even gramps got that one
    Huh?
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,010 Standard Supporter
    I have seen Gabbard up close. While I do think her team has done a great job with her make over and she clearly has worked hard on losing some weight, up close she is nowhere near what she looked like on stage.

    Looks are very important to democrats, a lot more so than for Republicans. The superficial feel good things are solidly deciding factors for democrats.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    I have seen Gabbard up close. While I do think her team has done a great job with her make over and she clearly has worked hard on losing some weight, up close she is nowhere near what she looked like on stage.

    Looks are very important to democrats, a lot more so than for Republicans. The superficial feel good things are solidly deciding factors for democrats.

    Sounds like she’s nothing special.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,010 Standard Supporter

    I have seen Gabbard up close. While I do think her team has done a great job with her make over and she clearly has worked hard on losing some weight, up close she is nowhere near what she looked like on stage.

    Looks are very important to democrats, a lot more so than for Republicans. The superficial feel good things are solidly deciding factors for democrats.

    Sounds like she’s nothing special.
    Don't get me wrong here, I am no George Clooney and I never make fun of peoples physical looks because I think it is cruel. But Gabbard has had some serious acne as a kid and you don't see that once the make up is on, also she is definitely less shapely than her posed photos (a lot of staged side photos) would lead you to believe. I think she is pleasant to look at but she has definitely had the make over. Being on stage is all about the entire package and like I said dem pollsters know that looks are real important to democrats. For those that disagree I will leave you with comments from your dem front runner:

    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,407 Founders Club


    Savagely.

    wowee
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,010 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    I have seen Gabbard up close. While I do think her team has done a great job with her make over and she clearly has worked hard on losing some weight, up close she is nowhere near what she looked like on stage.

    Looks are very important to democrats, a lot more so than for Republicans. The superficial feel good things are solidly deciding factors for democrats.

    Sounds like she’s nothing special.
    Don't get me wrong here, I am no George Clooney and I never make fun of peoples physical looks because I think it is cruel. But Gabbard has had some serious acne as a kid and you don't see that once the make up is on, also she is definitely less shapely than her posed photos (a lot of staged side photos) would lead you to believe. I think she is pleasant to look at but she has definitely had the make over. Being on stage is all about the entire package and like I said dem pollsters know that looks are real important to democrats. For those that disagree I will leave you with comments from your dem front runner:

    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."
    Then how do we explain Bernie?
    Free shit.

    As with every rich old fart with a young babe on their arm, money will get you a pass where looks are concerned.

  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    edited June 2019

    I have seen Gabbard up close. While I do think her team has done a great job with her make over and she clearly has worked hard on losing some weight, up close she is nowhere near what she looked like on stage.

    Looks are very important to democrats, a lot more so than for Republicans. The superficial feel good things are solidly deciding factors for democrats.


    You’re primarily comparing media personalities to politicians.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    #ProfilesInCourage
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter

    I have seen Gabbard up close. While I do think her team has done a great job with her make over and she clearly has worked hard on losing some weight, up close she is nowhere near what she looked like on stage.

    Looks are very important to democrats, a lot more so than for Republicans. The superficial feel good things are solidly deciding factors for democrats.

    Sounds like she’s nothing special.
    Don't get me wrong here, I am no George Clooney and I never make fun of peoples physical looks because I think it is cruel. But Gabbard has had some serious acne as a kid and you don't see that once the make up is on, also she is definitely less shapely than her posed photos (a lot of staged side photos) would lead you to believe. I think she is pleasant to look at but she has definitely had the make over. Being on stage is all about the entire package and like I said dem pollsters know that looks are real important to democrats. For those that disagree I will leave you with comments from your dem front runner:

    "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."
    9s & 10s don’t fuck hard enough. They mostly get fucked.

    7s & 8s fuck like crazed animals. On Meth.

    Childhood acne? Yeoman’s sex work ethic. Filthy whore. With every Orifice.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,046

    USMChawk said:

    I have seen Gabbard up close. While I do think her team has done a great job with her make over and she clearly has worked hard on losing some weight, up close she is nowhere near what she looked like on stage.

    Looks are very important to democrats, a lot more so than for Republicans. The superficial feel good things are solidly deciding factors for democrats.


    You’re primarily comparing media personalities to politicians.
    Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.

    I learned that from APAG.
    APAG learned that from you. You're Stalin man. You invented the game.
  • SonnyShackelford
    SonnyShackelford Member Posts: 1,005
    Too many pockmarks
  • El_K
    El_K Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,490 Swaye's Wigwam