Burgess Owens at “”Reparations” hearing
Comments
-
That's a whole lotta nothing.DJDuck said:You are ignorant of History Gentle Giant. You claim to be a lawyer. I have pointed out many times your narrow education has failed you in being able to analyze and process knowledge you were never focused on in your inadequate education. You are just full of crap again. Denial is not a River in Egypt moron.
What's another name for the Northern forces, Deej? It's a clue to their motivation. -
THE PARTIES SWITCHED!!!!!!111!!!!!
-
They went because they were forced to.HHusky said:Northern soldiers didn't go to war in 1861 in order to free the slaves, Deej. I guess quoting the passage I was referring to wasn't a big enough clue for you to post something responsive.
-
Some did. It was still a mostly volunteer army though.MikeDamone said:
They went because they were forced to.HHusky said:Northern soldiers didn't go to war in 1861 in order to free the slaves, Deej. I guess quoting the passage I was referring to wasn't a big enough clue for you to post something responsive.
-
Another uppity Black booed by libs at the “Reparations” hearing.
23-year-old black columnist says reparations would make young black people 'victims without their consent'
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/23-year-old-black-columnist-says-reparations-would-make-young-black-people-victims-without-their-consent -
Yeah, but still.HHusky said:
Some did. It was still a mostly volunteer army though.MikeDamone said:
They went because they were forced to.HHusky said:Northern soldiers didn't go to war in 1861 in order to free the slaves, Deej. I guess quoting the passage I was referring to wasn't a big enough clue for you to post something responsive.
-
Your questions were irrelevant Deej. You haven't changed much.DJDuck said:By the way you failed to answer my questions. You haven’t changed much.
-
Whatever obfuscation you want to present to make the truth murky 600,000 northern troops gave their lives. They were putting down an insurrection that had at it’s core the goal preserving slavery.
Should their ancestors pay Reparations.
This is just another issue Democrats think is a road to power. If you are against Reparations you are a bigot.
If one is to debate any issue one should debate the truth. I know that is impossible for liberals. -
So you were lying before because you actually did know the truth?DJDuck said:Whatever obfuscation you want to present to make the truth murky 600,000 northern troops gave their lives. They were putting down an insurrection that had as it’s main goal as preserving slavery. Should their ancestors pay Reparations.
This is just another issue Democrats think is a road to power. If you are against Reparations you are a bigot.
If one is to debate any issue one should debate the truth. I know that is impossible for liberals.
Given that Lincoln could never have sold the North on going to war in order to free the slaves, this is more than a trivial matter. -
Tax democrats at 90%.DJDuck said:Whatever obfuscation you want to present to make the truth murky 600,000 northern troops gave their lives. They were putting down an insurrection that had at it’s core the goal preserving slavery.
Should their ancestors pay Reparations.
This is just another issue Democrats think is a road to power. If you are against Reparations you are a bigot.
If one is to debate any issue one should debate the truth. I know that is impossible for liberals.
