Lesbian couple attacked.

SFGbob said:

Pitchfork51 said:

Anyone who uses the term dog whistle is a faggy pussy

Anyone who uses the term dog whistle and then runs and hides like a fucking Kunt when asked to cite an example of a racist dog whistle deserves to have their fucking ass beat to a pulp

salemcoog said:

Pitchfork51 said:

Anyone who uses the term dog whistle is a faggy pussy

I dunno.

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

ZoneUW said:

SFGbob said:

ZoneUW said:

SFGbob said:

BennyBeaver said:

salemcoog said:

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.

Great assumption.

My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.

The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.

The 18 year old isn’t a minor and I’m not even sure if GB has the same protections for under age perps as we do here in the US.

Weird how this whole underage deal didn’t impact the reporting on the MAGA hat wearing Covington kids

What do the Maga hat wearing Covington kids in Washington DC have to do with an attack on a bus in (checks notes) ... London?

As always, Bob brings up a completely irrelevant incident.

It helps if you’re not a dumbfuck.

MAGA hat wearing kids media has no problem reporting on their race. In fact it becomes a central theme in the reporting.

Race of the perps in this story? State secret

Lets say a video was released and it turns out these kids were all white.

What then? Your brain explodes?

Could happen, highly unlikely. Do you ever actually read the news?

Do you feel it’s just some odd coincidence that everyone who isn’t a committed leftist has come to a similar conclusion as to the race of the perps?

It’s not an accident

Imagine a world where the media is the true perpetrator of the crime.

salemcoog said:

Pitchfork51 said:

Anyone who uses the term dog whistle is a faggy pussy

I dunno.

2001400ex said:

salemcoog said:

ZoneUW said:

TurdBomber said:

BennyBeaver said:

salemcoog said:

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.

Great assumption.

My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.

The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.

And with that comment, BB plunges right back into the idiot pool for some further brainwashing.

Because any left leaning media is brainwashing while any random far-right media aggregate is objective fact and gold-standard journalism. Got it. totally doesn't sound like something a brainwashed person would say.

The really big difference is that the Beeb, ABC, NBC, CBS and a few other long time world wide news sources are somewhat trusted to report facts by hundreds of Millions of people.

Breitbart, Rush,Jones, etc. are the fringe. To be taken with a grain of salt. But absolutely everything changed that Tuesday night in November of 2016. The MSM became the fringe as well.

Except people here post shit from Breitbart and such as fact. (And pjmedia) there's millions of people that use then as trusted journalism.

And the Mueller report essentially backed up everything that was reported in the media. I know you don't like it, but it's true.

2001400ex said:

salemcoog said:

ZoneUW said:

TurdBomber said:

BennyBeaver said:

salemcoog said:

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.

Great assumption.

My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.

The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.

And with that comment, BB plunges right back into the idiot pool for some further brainwashing.

Because any left leaning media is brainwashing while any random far-right media aggregate is objective fact and gold-standard journalism. Got it. totally doesn't sound like something a brainwashed person would say.

The really big difference is that the Beeb, ABC, NBC, CBS and a few other long time world wide news sources are somewhat trusted to report facts by hundreds of Millions of people.

Breitbart, Rush,Jones, etc. are the fringe. To be taken with a grain of salt. But absolutely everything changed that Tuesday night in November of 2016. The MSM became the fringe as well.

Except people here post shit from Breitbart and such as fact. (And pjmedia) there's millions of people that use then as trusted journalism.

And the Mueller report essentially backed up everything that was reported in the media. I know you don't like it, but it's true.

2001400ex said:

Pitchfork51 said:

2001400ex said:

Pitchfork51 said:

2001400ex said:

salemcoog said:

ZoneUW said:

TurdBomber said:

BennyBeaver said:

salemcoog said:

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.

Great assumption.

My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.

The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.

And with that comment, BB plunges right back into the idiot pool for some further brainwashing.

Because any left leaning media is brainwashing while any random far-right media aggregate is objective fact and gold-standard journalism. Got it. totally doesn't sound like something a brainwashed person would say.

The really big difference is that the Beeb, ABC, NBC, CBS and a few other long time world wide news sources are somewhat trusted to report facts by hundreds of Millions of people.

Breitbart, Rush,Jones, etc. are the fringe. To be taken with a grain of salt. But absolutely everything changed that Tuesday night in November of 2016. The MSM became the fringe as well.

Except people here post shit from Breitbart and such as fact. (And pjmedia) there's millions of people that use then as trusted journalism.

And the Mueller report essentially backed up everything that was reported in the media. I know you don't like it, but it's true.

In case you didn't realize....no one gives a fuck about Mueller anymore

It's old news. Trump won, the Dems lost and looked pathetic, water is wet.

Losing to Donald Trump must be fucking infuriating, because he's a dumbass for sure.

Honestly I imagine some Dem leaders are pissed. Just like "fuck all I wanna do is get up there and say no I don't want immigrants and I don't give a fuck about climate change. I just wanna win for once but my shitty party has fucked me"

They keep losing because they are forced to defend the shitty side of things like immigration, guns, taxes, PC culture.

You think Nancy pelosi wants immigrants living next door?

There's way more people in this country that want additional controls over guns than don't. Just another example of you listening to your news source translation of what Democrats want versus what they actually say and do want.

ZoneUW said:

Very few people want to ban all guns or get rid of the second amendment. I’m definitely not one of them.
I just want common sense control methods.

2001400ex said:

salemcoog said:

ZoneUW said:

TurdBomber said:

BennyBeaver said:

salemcoog said:

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

BennyBeaver said:

MikeDamone said:

When no one will describe the attackers, that’s how you know. HondoBros are cool with it thought.

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/four-teenagers-arrested-attack-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

That's how we know what?

We don't know. But here's what we do know here in 2019. If a gang attacks another person or group of persons in relation to their race, sexual preference or religious idealogy, etc. the MSM would let us know if they were white.

Great assumption.

My assumption is because the attackers are teens (described as 15-18), their identities are being held privately.

The "MSM" paranoia outs you as an InfoWars/Brietbart/Limbaugh kook, so you've got that going for you, which is nice.

And with that comment, BB plunges right back into the idiot pool for some further brainwashing.

Because any left leaning media is brainwashing while any random far-right media aggregate is objective fact and gold-standard journalism. Got it. totally doesn't sound like something a brainwashed person would say.

The really big difference is that the Beeb, ABC, NBC, CBS and a few other long time world wide news sources are somewhat trusted to report facts by hundreds of Millions of people.

Breitbart, Rush,Jones, etc. are the fringe. To be taken with a grain of salt. But absolutely everything changed that Tuesday night in November of 2016. The MSM became the fringe as well.

Except people here post shit from Breitbart and such as fact. (And pjmedia) there's millions of people that use then as trusted journalism.

And the Mueller report essentially backed up everything that was reported in the media. I know you don't like it, but it's true.