Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Quaking in their boots update
RaceBannon
Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,759 
in Tug Tavern
https://foxnews.com/politics/geraldo-rivera-ag-barr-interview-should-have-comey-clapper-brennan-quaking-in-their-boots
Fox News correspondent at-large Geraldo Rivera is warning several Obama-era intelligence chiefs that they should be worried after Attorney General William Barr aired his concerns about the origins of the Mueller investigation in a new interview.
During an appearance on "Fox & Friends" Friday, Rivera said it's clear Barr wants to get to the bottom of the Russia probe's origins and that he has "his target" on some of the biggest names associated with it.
"If I were James Comey right now or James Clapper right now or John Brennan right now, I would be quaking in my boots," Rivera said.
"Why? Because the attorney general of the United States has set his target on you,” he said.
Barr, in his own interview, said that in his research he has only been left with more questions than answers.
“I assumed I’d get answers when I went in, and I have not gotten answers that are, well, satisfactory," Barr said. "And, in fact, I probably have more questions, and that some of the facts that, that I’ve learned don’t hang together with the official explanations of what happened.”
In the real world we call that lying
Fox News correspondent at-large Geraldo Rivera is warning several Obama-era intelligence chiefs that they should be worried after Attorney General William Barr aired his concerns about the origins of the Mueller investigation in a new interview.
During an appearance on "Fox & Friends" Friday, Rivera said it's clear Barr wants to get to the bottom of the Russia probe's origins and that he has "his target" on some of the biggest names associated with it.
"If I were James Comey right now or James Clapper right now or John Brennan right now, I would be quaking in my boots," Rivera said.
"Why? Because the attorney general of the United States has set his target on you,” he said.
Barr, in his own interview, said that in his research he has only been left with more questions than answers.
“I assumed I’d get answers when I went in, and I have not gotten answers that are, well, satisfactory," Barr said. "And, in fact, I probably have more questions, and that some of the facts that, that I’ve learned don’t hang together with the official explanations of what happened.”
In the real world we call that lying
Comments
-
Barr gets it.
JAN CRAWFORD: But it seems like you have a concern that there may have been a bias by top officials in the FBI as they looked at whether to launch and conduct this investigation?
WILLIAM BARR: Well it's hard to read some of the texts with and not feel that there was gross bias at work and they're appalling. And if the shoe were on the other--
JAN CRAWFORD: Appalling.
WILLIAM BARR: Those were appalling. And on their face they were very damning and I think if the shoe was on the other foot we could be hearing a lot about it. If those kinds of discussions were held you know when Obama first ran for office, people talking about Obama in those tones and suggesting that "Oh that he might be a Manchurian candidate for Islam or something like that." You know some wild accusations like that and you had that kind of discussion back and forth, you don't think we would be hearing a lot more about it?
I recommend the entire interview
He goes after the press and Mueller.
The explanation over why he released the 4 page summary and how Mueller's refusal to highlight the grand jury testimony so that it could be quickly redacted and the report released was also interesting. The summary fucked up the narrative that Mueller wanted to leak to the press.
My respect for Barr has grown, the guy has balls.
-
-
JAN CRAWFORD: You- I guess when you said that there were things done that were not the typical run of business, ad hoc, small group, it's not how these counterintelligence operations normally work. I think that maybe Comey and others might say well this was such an extraordinary thing we had to keep it so closely held. So we had to do it differently what's your response to that? Is that legit?
WILLIAM BARR: Well it might be legit under certain circumstances but a lot of that has to do with how good the evidence was at that point. And you know Mueller has spent two and half years and the fact is there is no evidence of a conspiracy. So it was bogus, this whole idea that the Trump was in cahoots with the Russians is bogus.
Gosh Hondo the pathological liar said it was a "documented fact." -
AG Barr Sends Warning to Deep State in Blunt CBS Interview: Govt Interference in Elections as Bad as Foreign
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/ag-barr-sends-warning-to-deep-state-in-blunt-cbs-interview-govt-interference-in-elections-as-bad-as-foreign/ -
Barr would have never written the Summary if Mueller had done what he was supposed to do and identified the Grand Jury material.
Now why didn't Mueller highlight that material? He knew Barr couldn't legally release the report without the information being removed. Mueller and his team wanted that time it would take for Barr to release the report to leak their narrative to the press. Barr's summary rat fucked that plan.
-
FIREWORKS! AG Barr Slams Mueller’s “Legal Analysis” – Says “Did Not Reflect Views” of the Justice Department (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/fireworks-ag-barr-slams-muellers-legal-analysis-says-did-not-reflect-views-of-the-justice-department-video/ -
The previous admin took a non-existent tie to Russia and turned it into a 2+ year investigation. Let's see what the current admin can do with this.allpurpleallgold said:
-
He also questions the pathetic investigation methods that Obama's FBI used if the threat of Russian interference was as alarming as everyone is now claiming they believed it to be.
Why was their response to this "alarm" limited to "dangling a confidential informant in front of a peripheral player in the Trump campaign" if the threat was so alarming?
He isn't buying their bullshit story. -
Race if you haven't listened to the entire interview you should do so. Right man in the right position. Barr was a home run pick.
-
I haven't heard it start to finish so I think I will. I like what I have heardSFGbob said:Race if you haven't listened to the entire interview you should do so. Right man in the right position. Barr was a home run pick.
-
Meanwhile from the He Can Do Whatever He wants File
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said Friday “there certainly is” justification for Congress to begin impeachment proceedings against President Trump, but said it was critical for the American public to agree before launching the process.
During an interview on WNYC, Nadler, whose committee would lead impeachment proceedings, cautioned the move, noting the importance of having the American public on board first.
“Impeachment is a political act, and you cannot impeach a president if the American people will not support it,” said Nadler, D-N.Y. “The American people, right now, do not support it because they do not know the story. They don’t know the facts.”
Nadler added: “We have to get the facts out. We have to hold a series of hearings, we have to hold the investigations.”
Nadler also vowed to hold televised hearings to “have a dialogue with the American people so people can make informed decisions and know what’s going on.”
“It’s very important that [Special Counsel Robert Mueller], to a television audience and to the American people, state [his findings] and answer questions about it, even if there is no new information,” Nadler said.
I think we should have Mueller do a two year investigation to get the facts out!!!
Why is Nadler such a pussy. Let's get this impeachment party started! -
It’s a crying shame Trump named Co- conspirator Jeff Sessions as AG. It was by far the worst mistake of his Presidency. Given that HE DID misrepresent himself to Trump.SFGbob said:Race if you haven't listened to the entire interview you should do so. Right man in the right position. Barr was a home run pick.
-
‘What is he afraid of?’ Here’s proof Adam Schiff is VERY on edge about Barr’s probe into origins of Russia collusion hoax
https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2019/05/31/what-is-he-afraid-of-heres-proof-adam-schiff-is-very-on-edge-about-barrs-probe-into-origins-of-russia-collusion-hoax/ -
Barr publicly stated that the Intel Agencies are dragging their feet on giving up docs
-
His comments at the end of the interview on who he thinks it is that shredding our norms and institutions is great. It's the people who are "resisting" a democratically elected President with everything they have who are destroying our norms and institutions.
-
Oranges!
Drip drip drip? -
"Some of the facts that, that I’ve learned don’t hang together with the official explanations of what happened.”
Sounds like a Sark post game explanation of a UW loss -
We must look at the oranges of the investigation!
-
Suck, suck, suck!!!HHusky said:Oranges!
Drip drip drip?
You interest in the truth and facts is so refreshing O'Keefed. What are you afraid of O'Keefed? -
We are on the wagon for team transparency right?CirrhosisDawg said:We must look at the oranges of the investigation!
If Trump colluded I want to know and I want him impeached.
If the Dems pulled a Chicago style "investigation" I want to know and I want them taken to task.
I look forward to more of this coming out into the open. -
Why does that sound so eerily familiar...HHusky said: -
If you can find one instance where I've ever made that prediction you'd have just penned a really sick burn O'Keefed. But since you won't be able to find any quote of me saying that, all you have is your standard, tired and played out O'Keefed strawman ass fuck.HHusky said: -
Nervous, Andy? McCabe Backs Down From Claims Trump is a Russian Asset (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/nervous-andy-mccabe-backs-down-from-claims-trump-is-a-russian-asset-video/ -
Nervous, Andy? McCabe Backs Down From Claims Trump is a Russian Asset (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/nervous-andy-mccabe-backs-down-from-claims-trump-is-a-russian-asset-video/ -
I haven't seen this much pressing on this board in a long time.
-
Interesting, since your post fails to address any of the statements made by Barr including the one that directly addresses your “documented fact” lie.2001400ex said:I haven't seen this much pressing on this board in a long time.
Other than an acknowledgement that Barr’s statements made your snatch hurt and you’re too stupid to offer an intelligent response what could be more “pressing” than your vacuous canned response Hondo? -
Why so angry Bob? Trump is exonerated and Hillary and Obama are going to jail. You should be happy.SFGbob said:
Interesting, since your post fails to address any of the statements made by Barr including the one that directly addresses your “documented fact” lie.2001400ex said:I haven't seen this much pressing on this board in a long time.
Other than an acknowledgement that Barr’s statements made your snatch hurt and you’re too stupid to offer an intelligent response what could be more “pressing” than your vacuous canned response Hondo? -
The real question is how much dirt does the deep state morons have on how many members of our government and congress. They are listening/reading to every communication. Will they be able to blackmail enough of them to matter?
-
2001400ex said:
Why so angry Bob? Trump is exonerated and Hillary and Obama are going to jail. You should be happy.SFGbob said:
Interesting, since your post fails to address any of the statements made by Barr including the one that directly addresses your “documented fact” lie.2001400ex said:I haven't seen this much pressing on this board in a long time.
Other than an acknowledgement that Barr’s statements made your snatch hurt and you’re too stupid to offer an intelligent response what could be more “pressing” than your vacuous canned response Hondo?
Hondo goes with his "you're angry" Kunt act when he can't offer an intelligent response. Why would you think that you being a lightweight dumbfuck makes me angry Hondo? You're comedic relief around here. Everyone both liberal and conservative can laugh at what a dumbfuck you are.
Two posts and not a single one addressed anything said by Barr including the fact that he fucking nuked your "documented fact" lie. Now why would I be angry over these facts?
