Trump’s tax cuts barely boosted growth or wages and is not paying for itself
Comments
-
-
Still lying about the tax cuts
-
So socialists in the UK are doing the tabulations?
Nice pick. -
-
"Addressing the report’s findings, senator Ron Wyden"
LOL! The above is all one need to read. Oh and when they claim it is a bipartisan report? They are lying to you. But don't let that stop you from posting this fake news.
This is where math challenged democrats lie and their followers repeat the lie. While the report is correct on what it is focusing on, there is zero attention paid to the jobs that have been created under Trump. That idiot Widen and this poster would have you believe that the tax cut is a failure if wages don't go up exponentially and then they play the classic democrat game by stating that somehow taxpayers and corporations keeping more of their own money is "costing the government" and somehow we must find "payment" for the tax cuts. They are completely forgetting or purposefully ignoring the fact that the government is all of us and not our fucking boss or bill collector. For instance, under Trump manufacturers have created 6 times more jobs than under BO's last two years. This report does not account for any of those gains. As we know, most of those that have come off of welfare or unemployment were making zero and actually costing all of us money. When those people got jobs at 40K a year that is a huge net gain and clearly one that democrats have no desire to talk about.allpurpleallgold said:
The tax cut has had a huge impact on our country. Not only for the shareholders and corporations but for millions who now have more cash. If you are making $48K a year you have an extra $1500 in your pocket. That is real money and guess what it is not some fictitious "government's" money, it is our money. It is insulting to hear democrats talk as if the government is owed something. Fuck you people and your religion of politics. -
These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase. -
Less government workers and more private sector workers. Looks like Trump is doing his job.
-
THISgreenblood said:Less government workers and more private sector workers. Looks like Trump is doing his job.
-
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase. -
And manufacturing jobs?HHusky said:
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase. -
Which has nothing to do with:HHusky said:
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase.
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
This fact seems to have fucked you up -
They are up under both. Manufacturing employment is less than 9% of the workforce in the US. This isn't exactly a return to the 1950s. No one has specified when America was Great Before, so comparisons are difficult.HoustonHusky said:
And manufacturing jobs?HHusky said:
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase. -
You seem to be confused about the office Obama held.RaceBannon said:
Which has nothing to do with:HHusky said:
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase.
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
This fact seems to have fucked you up -
You said government hiring was flat under Obama yet it was 5 times more than manufacturing jobs under ObamaHHusky said:
They are up under both. Manufacturing employment is less than 9% of the workforce in the US. This isn't exactly a return to the 1950s. No one has specified when America was Great Before, so comparisons are difficult.HoustonHusky said:
And manufacturing jobs?HHusky said:
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase.
That may be "up under both" but is a dishonest use of statistics at best
They are 'Up a hell of a lot more" under Trump may have been what you were looking for
Math is hard -
Are we great again yet?RaceBannon said:
You said government hiring was flat under Obama yet it was 5 times more than manufacturing jobs under ObamaHHusky said:
They are up under both. Manufacturing employment is less than 9% of the workforce in the US. This isn't exactly a return to the 1950s. No one has specified when America was Great Before, so comparisons are difficult.HoustonHusky said:
And manufacturing jobs?HHusky said:
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase.
That may be "up under both" but is a dishonest use of statistics at best
They are 'Up a hell of a lot more" under Trump may have been what you were looking for
Math is hard -
I'd change the subject too if I were youHHusky said:
Are we great again yet?RaceBannon said:
You said government hiring was flat under Obama yet it was 5 times more than manufacturing jobs under ObamaHHusky said:
They are up under both. Manufacturing employment is less than 9% of the workforce in the US. This isn't exactly a return to the 1950s. No one has specified when America was Great Before, so comparisons are difficult.HoustonHusky said:
And manufacturing jobs?HHusky said:
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase.
That may be "up under both" but is a dishonest use of statistics at best
They are 'Up a hell of a lot more" under Trump may have been what you were looking for
Math is hard -
Just asking whether these minor increases in manufacturing employment have you yearning to watch some Ozzie and Harriet reruns.RaceBannon said:
I'd change the subject too if I were youHHusky said:
Are we great again yet?RaceBannon said:
You said government hiring was flat under Obama yet it was 5 times more than manufacturing jobs under ObamaHHusky said:
They are up under both. Manufacturing employment is less than 9% of the workforce in the US. This isn't exactly a return to the 1950s. No one has specified when America was Great Before, so comparisons are difficult.HoustonHusky said:
And manufacturing jobs?HHusky said:
Federal government employment was flat during the Obama years, but don't the facts fuck you up.Bendintheriver said:These numbers paint the picture. Obama was creating government jobs (for math challenged liberals that means higher taxes for everyone). Trump is creating private sector jobs which in comparison to Obama is a total turn around and a net positive which of course the article at top does not bother to discuss. The article is written as if we owe the government money because we get to keep more of our own. This only makes sense to idiotic democrats.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevore/2019/02/01/manufacturers-added-6-times-more-jobs-under-trump-than-under-obamas-last-2-years/#a114fe25635a
Looking at Trump’s first two years, the revised BLS data shows that more than two manufacturing jobs were added for every one job added in government at the federal, state, and local level. In contrast, under Obama, almost five government jobs were added for every one manufacturing job.
After revising its data for past periods, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that seasonally adjusted nonfarm employment grew by 5.1 million jobs in President Trump’s first full two years in office, a 3.5% increase. Private sector payrolls grew by 4.9 million, a 4.0% increase.
That may be "up under both" but is a dishonest use of statistics at best
They are 'Up a hell of a lot more" under Trump may have been what you were looking for
Math is hard -
https://thehill.com/policy/finance/444286-consumer-sentiment-in-us-hits-15-year-high-report
Bad news for H. Good news for America
As I was googling through this subject I noted several articles on how Americans don't care about the economy anymore
As sure as sign as you will find that the economy is doing very good
Keep hope alive maybe the trade war will cause a depression like the experts keep telling us. Fingers crossed -
Experts? The “yield curve” is prompting warnings. The yield curve is a function of investor sentiments and outlooks, and where profit (or protection) is best extracted. It’s a creature of a free market economy outside federal government protectionist policy making that you prefer, and that’s the reason you don’t understand.RaceBannon said:https://thehill.com/policy/finance/444286-consumer-sentiment-in-us-hits-15-year-high-report
Bad news for H. Good news for America
As I was googling through this subject I noted several articles on how Americans don't care about the economy anymore
As sure as sign as you will find that the economy is doing very good
Keep hope alive maybe the trade war will cause a depression like the experts keep telling us. Fingers crossed -
Keep hope aliveCirrhosisDawg said:
Experts? The “yield curve” is prompting warnings. The yield curve is a function of investor sentiments and outlooks, and where profit (or protection) is best extracted. It’s a creature of a free market economy outside federal government protectionist policy making that you prefer, and that’s the reason you don’t understand.RaceBannon said:https://thehill.com/policy/finance/444286-consumer-sentiment-in-us-hits-15-year-high-report
Bad news for H. Good news for America
As I was googling through this subject I noted several articles on how Americans don't care about the economy anymore
As sure as sign as you will find that the economy is doing very good
Keep hope alive maybe the trade war will cause a depression like the experts keep telling us. Fingers crossed
Bad trade deals are GOOD for America
We shouldn't expect anything better
There is no free market with China
There might be someday if weak willed spineless idiots like you don't have anything to do with it -
I am not the yield curve. I hope you feel better someday.RaceBannon said:
Keep hope aliveCirrhosisDawg said:
Experts? The “yield curve” is prompting warnings. The yield curve is a function of investor sentiments and outlooks, and where profit (or protection) is best extracted. It’s a creature of a free market economy outside federal government protectionist policy making that you prefer, and that’s the reason you don’t understand.RaceBannon said:https://thehill.com/policy/finance/444286-consumer-sentiment-in-us-hits-15-year-high-report
Bad news for H. Good news for America
As I was googling through this subject I noted several articles on how Americans don't care about the economy anymore
As sure as sign as you will find that the economy is doing very good
Keep hope alive maybe the trade war will cause a depression like the experts keep telling us. Fingers crossed
Bad trade deals are GOOD for America
We shouldn't expect anything better
There is no free market with China
There might be someday if weak willed spineless idiots like you don't have anything to do with it -
I feel great
China is our enemy. And they own Biden
Not a tough call at all -
El Monte boy thinks China IP piracy is just part of the "free market."
-
I knew you’d reduce yourself to the level of communist China. It’s what hopelessly uncompetitive people do.SFGbob said:El Monte boy thinks China IP piracy is just part of the "free market."
-
I knew you'd post some barely coherent gibberish. It's what El Monte boy the lightweight Kunt does.CirrhosisDawg said:
I knew you’d reduce yourself to the level of communist China. It’s what hopelessly uncompetitive people do.SFGbob said:El Monte boy thinks China IP piracy is just part of the "free market."
-
Your ignore function still isn’t working GayBob.SFGbob said:
I knew you'd post some barely coherent gibberish. It's what El Monte boy the lightweight Kunt does.CirrhosisDawg said:
I knew you’d reduce yourself to the level of communist China. It’s what hopelessly uncompetitive people do.SFGbob said:El Monte boy thinks China IP piracy is just part of the "free market."
-
I like AMERICA in this oneCirrhosisDawg said:
I knew you’d reduce yourself to the level of communist China. It’s what hopelessly uncompetitive people do.SFGbob said:El Monte boy thinks China IP piracy is just part of the "free market."
Who are you rooting for? Rhetorical -
Yeah the ignore function here works about as well as your brain El Monte. So tell me El Monte, how did I reduce myself to the level of Communist China? Cue the Kunt gibberish.CirrhosisDawg said:
Your ignore function still isn’t working GayBob.SFGbob said:
I knew you'd post some barely coherent gibberish. It's what El Monte boy the lightweight Kunt does.CirrhosisDawg said:
I knew you’d reduce yourself to the level of communist China. It’s what hopelessly uncompetitive people do.SFGbob said:El Monte boy thinks China IP piracy is just part of the "free market."
-
Deficits matter now Damone. Please try to keep up.MikeDamone said:So
-
