Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

How come Nadler no longer wants Mueller to testify?

245

Comments

  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.
    Not even close

    Its pretty clear what Mueller did here to anyone other than the Muellertards

    Hi @CirrhosisDawg and @HHusky

    Mueller is scared and a pussy and a piece of shit

    I was right

    Again
    I'd love to see Mueller questioned on how he squares his statement that Barr didn't lie or misrepresent his Report with Barr's testimony that Mueller stated 3 times if his decision to not decide the obstruction issue was because of the OLC opinion and Mueller emphatically said that wasn't the case with his statements made today.

    I'd also love to know if Mueller ever looked into the origins of the Dossier and did he ever ask to see the secured DNC server that was hacked.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    So you agree Trump testified as well. Got it.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,934
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,200
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.

    He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,200
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    HHusky said:



    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.

    He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.
    "This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy."
  • Options
    Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,227
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited May 2019
    "The evidence does not establish that the termination of Comey was designed to cover up a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia because the investigation did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged Russian computer-hacking or active-measure conspiracies, or that the president otherwise had an unlawful relationship with any Russian official."

    Mueller Report.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:



    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.

    He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.
    "This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy."
    Of course collusion is much different than a criminal conspiracy. The over 100 interactions between the Trump campaign and Russians or Russian agents detailed in the report prove collusion - what Mueller didn't think he could prove beyond a reasonable doubt was an overarching criminal conspiracy between Trump and the Russian government in part because so many people were/are obfuscating and lying. As you correctly point out coming to the conclusion they couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt is far from seeing no evidence at all.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,443
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    There is more evidence of Hillary working with the Russians on the dossier that launched the investigation but don't let that stop you from your anti American guilty until proven innocent bullshit

    Russia sounds like it's more your speed. Some things never change. The Democrats and the commies have always been close
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,200
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited May 2019
    Dude61 said:

    "The evidence does not establish that the termination of Comey was designed to cover up a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia because the investigation did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged Russian computer-hacking or active-measure conspiracies, or that the president otherwise had an unlawful relationship with any Russian official."

    Mueller Report.

    "Does not establish" is different than saying there was no evidence. There are instances where the report says explicitly that there is no evidence of something. It's a distinction with a difference. As the report itself states: "A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts."
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,934
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Interactions between a nominee and foreign governments are historically extensive. Unless you want Obama indicted. Interactions are not collusion. If there was collusion Mueller would have found it and proposed indictment. Just one piece of real evidence is all I'm asking for. What did the Russians have that would help Trump?
  • Options
    ramenduckramenduck Member Posts: 734
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    edited May 2019

    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.

    Firing Comey was a start. Independent of what you may think of Comey (I personally support that he is no longer leading the FBI), in any culture political, corporate, or otherwise, as a rule you don't get to fire the person investigating you. It was a banana republic move and I said as much on the Shed the day it happened. Trump should have known better. He certainly should have known better than to cite the Russia investigation as a driver for the decision.

    I was never on the collusion train.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    ramenduck said:

    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.

    Firing Comey was a start. Independent of what you may think of Comey (I personally support that he is no longer leading the FBI), in any culture political, corporate, or otherwise, as a rule you don't get to fire the person investigating you. It was a banana republic move and I said as much on the Shed the day it happened. Trump should have known better. He certainly should have known better than to cite the Russia investigation as a driver for the decision.

    I was never on the collusion train.
    No one gives a shit about the shed or what you said there.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,443
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    To be fair no one gives a shit about Comey either

    He was fired by his boss. Muellertards did the investigation

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,200
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,443
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"
    I do

    Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,200
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"
    I do

    Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report

    He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,443
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"
    I do

    Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report

    He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.
    Yep. His view of his inner rectum

    There is nothing to stop Mueller from showing this thing called evidence

    If only he had any
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,200
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"
    I do

    Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report

    He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.
    Yep. His view of his inner rectum

    There is nothing to stop Mueller from showing this thing called evidence

    If only he had any
    We all have a ton of the obstruction evidence. Much of it was done in public. Mueller already said that he won’t state his opinion because Daddy can’t rebut the claim in any proceeding. I don’t really think you want Mueller’s answer.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"
    I do

    Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report

    He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.
    Yep. His view of his inner rectum

    There is nothing to stop Mueller from showing this thing called evidence

    If only he had any
    We all have a ton of the obstruction evidence. Much of it was done in public. Mueller already said that he won’t state his opinion because Daddy can’t rebut the claim in any proceeding. I don’t really think you want Mueller’s answer.
    Imagine not accepting the results of an election. No serious person would think it could be rigged.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,443
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"
    I do

    Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report

    He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.
    Yep. His view of his inner rectum

    There is nothing to stop Mueller from showing this thing called evidence

    If only he had any
    We all have a ton of the obstruction evidence. Much of it was done in public. Mueller already said that he won’t state his opinion because Daddy can’t rebut the claim in any proceeding. I don’t really think you want Mueller’s answer.
    I've told you three times now that I want that pussy Mueller under oath

    You don't need a road map. You don't need to guess. You dont need to make shit up

    I am clearly saying it.

    I realize you struggle with that

    Nothing is stopping Mueller from sharing this mystery evidence.

    At all

    It doesn't exist
Sign In or Register to comment.