How come Nadler no longer wants Mueller to testify?
Comments
-
Firing Comey was a start. Independent of what you may think of Comey (I personally support that he is no longer leading the FBI), in any culture political, corporate, or otherwise, as a rule you don't get to fire the person investigating you. It was a banana republic move and I said as much on the Shed the day it happened. Trump should have known better. He certainly should have known better than to cite the Russia investigation as a driver for the decision.WestlinnDuck said:Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.
No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.
I was never on the collusion train. -
No one gives a shit about the shed or what you said there.ramenduck said:
Firing Comey was a start. Independent of what you may think of Comey (I personally support that he is no longer leading the FBI), in any culture political, corporate, or otherwise, as a rule you don't get to fire the person investigating you. It was a banana republic move and I said as much on the Shed the day it happened. Trump should have known better. He certainly should have known better than to cite the Russia investigation as a driver for the decision.WestlinnDuck said:Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.
No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.
I was never on the collusion train. -
To be fair no one gives a shit about Comey either
He was fired by his boss. Muellertards did the investigation
-
Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"SFGbob said:Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?
Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.
Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly
if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation. -
I doHHusky said:
Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"SFGbob said:Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?
Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.
Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly
if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report
-
He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.RaceBannon said:
I doHHusky said:
Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"SFGbob said:Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?
Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.
Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly
if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report -
Yep. His view of his inner rectumHHusky said:
He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.RaceBannon said:
I doHHusky said:
Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"SFGbob said:Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?
Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.
Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly
if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report
There is nothing to stop Mueller from showing this thing called evidence
If only he had any -
We all have a ton of the obstruction evidence. Much of it was done in public. Mueller already said that he won’t state his opinion because Daddy can’t rebut the claim in any proceeding. I don’t really think you want Mueller’s answer.RaceBannon said:
Yep. His view of his inner rectumHHusky said:
He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.RaceBannon said:
I doHHusky said:
Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"SFGbob said:Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?
Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.
Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly
if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report
There is nothing to stop Mueller from showing this thing called evidence
If only he had any -
Imagine not accepting the results of an election. No serious person would think it could be rigged.HHusky said:
We all have a ton of the obstruction evidence. Much of it was done in public. Mueller already said that he won’t state his opinion because Daddy can’t rebut the claim in any proceeding. I don’t really think you want Mueller’s answer.RaceBannon said:
Yep. His view of his inner rectumHHusky said:
He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.RaceBannon said:
I doHHusky said:
Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"SFGbob said:Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?
Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.
Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly
if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report
There is nothing to stop Mueller from showing this thing called evidence
If only he had any -
I've told you three times now that I want that pussy Mueller under oathHHusky said:
We all have a ton of the obstruction evidence. Much of it was done in public. Mueller already said that he won’t state his opinion because Daddy can’t rebut the claim in any proceeding. I don’t really think you want Mueller’s answer.RaceBannon said:
Yep. His view of his inner rectumHHusky said:
He could have. Judge Napolitano and I think he made his view clear today, however.RaceBannon said:
I doHHusky said:
Well you don't really want Mueller's answer to this question, blob: "If he were not the sitting President of the United States, would you have charged him with a crime or crimes?"SFGbob said:Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?
Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.
Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly
if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
Because its bullshit to think he couldn't put that in his report
There is nothing to stop Mueller from showing this thing called evidence
If only he had any
You don't need a road map. You don't need to guess. You dont need to make shit up
I am clearly saying it.
I realize you struggle with that
Nothing is stopping Mueller from sharing this mystery evidence.
At all
It doesn't exist
