How come Nadler no longer wants Mueller to testify?
Comments
-
I'd love to see Mueller questioned on how he squares his statement that Barr didn't lie or misrepresent his Report with Barr's testimony that Mueller stated 3 times if his decision to not decide the obstruction issue was because of the OLC opinion and Mueller emphatically said that wasn't the case with his statements made today.RaceBannon said:
Not even closeHHusky said:
You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.SFGbob said:Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?
Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.
Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly
if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
Its pretty clear what Mueller did here to anyone other than the Muellertards
Hi @CirrhosisDawg and @HHusky
Mueller is scared and a pussy and a piece of shit
I was right
Again
I'd also love to know if Mueller ever looked into the origins of the Dossier and did he ever ask to see the secured DNC server that was hacked. -
So you agree Trump testified as well. Got it.HHusky said:Mueller testified. It was just this morning.
-
Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.
No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because. -
He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.
No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because. -
"This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy."HHusky said:
He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.
No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because. -
"The evidence does not establish that the termination of Comey was designed to cover up a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia because the investigation did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged Russian computer-hacking or active-measure conspiracies, or that the president otherwise had an unlawful relationship with any Russian official."
Mueller Report. -
Of course collusion is much different than a criminal conspiracy. The over 100 interactions between the Trump campaign and Russians or Russian agents detailed in the report prove collusion - what Mueller didn't think he could prove beyond a reasonable doubt was an overarching criminal conspiracy between Trump and the Russian government in part because so many people were/are obfuscating and lying. As you correctly point out coming to the conclusion they couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt is far from seeing no evidence at all.HHusky said:
"This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy."HHusky said:
He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.
No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because. -
There is more evidence of Hillary working with the Russians on the dossier that launched the investigation but don't let that stop you from your anti American guilty until proven innocent bullshit
Russia sounds like it's more your speed. Some things never change. The Democrats and the commies have always been close -
"Does not establish" is different than saying there was no evidence. There are instances where the report says explicitly that there is no evidence of something. It's a distinction with a difference. As the report itself states: "A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts."Dude61 said:"The evidence does not establish that the termination of Comey was designed to cover up a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia because the investigation did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged Russian computer-hacking or active-measure conspiracies, or that the president otherwise had an unlawful relationship with any Russian official."
Mueller Report. -
Interactions between a nominee and foreign governments are historically extensive. Unless you want Obama indicted. Interactions are not collusion. If there was collusion Mueller would have found it and proposed indictment. Just one piece of real evidence is all I'm asking for. What did the Russians have that would help Trump?
