Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How come Nadler no longer wants Mueller to testify?

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
What happened libs? I thought you wanted transparency?
«13

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited May 2019
    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal. I never realized that making an unchallenged statement to the press was "testifying."

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Oh I know what the script says O'Keefed. I'd be interested in hear Mueller answer the questions that aren't on the script.

    Did you look into the possibility that the Russians interfered in our election by providing disinformation that was paid for by Hillary and the DNC? Yes or No? And if no, why not? Wasn't the entire purpose of your investigation to look into Russian meddling in our election? Why did you ignore that?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    I suppose he was worthless to people he need a fucking road map to get to the bathroom.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    SFGbob said:

    Oh I know what the script says O'Keefed. I'd be interested in hear Mueller answer the questions that aren't on the script.

    Did you look into the possibility that the Russians interfered in our election by providing disinformation that was paid for by Hillary and the DNC? Yes or No? And if no, why not? Wasn't the entire purpose of your investigation to look into Russian meddling in our election? Why did you ignore that?

    The Senate has subpoena power. Go for it!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited May 2019
    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    The shallow breathing and tightness in chest when Race and Bob-o post is palpable. Emotional investment confirmed. Rational line of mental processing in question.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    I suppose he was worthless to people he need a fucking road map to get to the bathroom.
    Yes we needed a two plus year investigation and hundreds of thousands of documents and hundreds of hours of testimony so you need a fucking road map to discern the conclusion or lack thereof

    You skinny white rich smart people sure can sound stupid
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Gwad said:

    The shallow breathing and tightness in chest when Race and Bob-o post is palpable. Emotional investment confirmed. Rational line of mental processing in question.

    Yeah, just as I sense you sucking on a big fat cock right now. It's palpable.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    I suppose he was worthless to people he need a fucking road map to get to the bathroom.
    Yes we needed a two plus year investigation and hundreds of thousands of documents and hundreds of hours of testimony so you need a fucking road map to discern the conclusion or lack thereof

    You skinny white rich smart people sure can sound stupid
    You sound upset.
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    edited May 2019
    SFGbob said:

    Gwad said:

    The shallow breathing and tightness in chest when Race and Bob-o post is palpable. Emotional investment confirmed. Rational line of mental processing in question.

    Yeah, just as I sense you sucking on a big fat cock right now. It's palpable.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.
    There it is, that world famous O'Keefed mind reading act. Always a fan favorite.

    What am I thinking right now O'Keefed?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.
    Not even close

    Its pretty clear what Mueller did here to anyone other than the Muellertards

    Hi @CirrhosisDawg and @HHusky

    Mueller is scared and a pussy and a piece of shit

    I was right

    Again
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    Gwad said:

    The shallow breathing and tightness in chest when Race and Bob-o post is palpable. Emotional investment confirmed. Rational line of mental processing in question.




  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    I suppose he was worthless to people he need a fucking road map to get to the bathroom.
    Yes we needed a two plus year investigation and hundreds of thousands of documents and hundreds of hours of testimony so you need a fucking road map to discern the conclusion or lack thereof

    You skinny white rich smart people sure can sound stupid
    You sound upset.
    Its all about transparency
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.
    Not even close

    Its pretty clear what Mueller did here to anyone other than the Muellertards

    Hi @CirrhosisDawg and @HHusky

    Mueller is scared and a pussy and a piece of shit

    I was right

    Again
    I'd love to see Mueller questioned on how he squares his statement that Barr didn't lie or misrepresent his Report with Barr's testimony that Mueller stated 3 times if his decision to not decide the obstruction issue was because of the OLC opinion and Mueller emphatically said that wasn't the case with his statements made today.

    I'd also love to know if Mueller ever looked into the origins of the Dossier and did he ever ask to see the secured DNC server that was hacked.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    So you agree Trump testified as well. Got it.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,537 Standard Supporter
    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881

    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.

    He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    HHusky said:



    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.

    He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.
    "This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy."
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    edited May 2019
    "The evidence does not establish that the termination of Comey was designed to cover up a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia because the investigation did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged Russian computer-hacking or active-measure conspiracies, or that the president otherwise had an unlawful relationship with any Russian official."

    Mueller Report.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:



    Another big question that Mueller doesn’t want to answer is when did he know that Trump and campaign didn’t collude with the Russians. He knew at the start of the investigation that the Steele dossier had no confirmed information and that it was the basis for the FISA warrants. His early investigation was focused on tax returns, failure to register as a foreign agent and corruption. All incidences that were not related to the Trump campaign. With no actual evidence of collusion to pursue, Mueller then tried to flip Trump associates to “find” the evidence. There was no flipping because there was no evidence to provide Mueller. Mueller’s special prosecutor authorization was therefore complete – unless Mueller wanted to pursue the actual collusion which was coordinated by the PIPS campaign, CIA, FBI and the DOJ.

    No Trump collusion. Make your report available before the 2018 midterm elections and call it good. But Mueller was not independent, he is a lying political hack. He then shifted gears and went after the mythical obstruction crime. Even today, Mueller and you leftards can’t tell me how Mueller was obstructed. And yet, you all “feel” that he was. You just can’t tell us – because.

    He has never said he found the Trump campaign didn't collude with the Russians. That's wishful thinking, Gasbag.
    "This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy."
    Of course collusion is much different than a criminal conspiracy. The over 100 interactions between the Trump campaign and Russians or Russian agents detailed in the report prove collusion - what Mueller didn't think he could prove beyond a reasonable doubt was an overarching criminal conspiracy between Trump and the Russian government in part because so many people were/are obfuscating and lying. As you correctly point out coming to the conclusion they couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt is far from seeing no evidence at all.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    There is more evidence of Hillary working with the Russians on the dossier that launched the investigation but don't let that stop you from your anti American guilty until proven innocent bullshit

    Russia sounds like it's more your speed. Some things never change. The Democrats and the commies have always been close
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    edited May 2019
    Dude61 said:

    "The evidence does not establish that the termination of Comey was designed to cover up a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia because the investigation did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged Russian computer-hacking or active-measure conspiracies, or that the president otherwise had an unlawful relationship with any Russian official."

    Mueller Report.

    "Does not establish" is different than saying there was no evidence. There are instances where the report says explicitly that there is no evidence of something. It's a distinction with a difference. As the report itself states: "A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts."
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,537 Standard Supporter
    Interactions between a nominee and foreign governments are historically extensive. Unless you want Obama indicted. Interactions are not collusion. If there was collusion Mueller would have found it and proposed indictment. Just one piece of real evidence is all I'm asking for. What did the Russians have that would help Trump?