Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How come Nadler no longer wants Mueller to testify?

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
in Tug Tavern
What happened libs? I thought you wanted transparency?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1345

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 23,637
    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited May 2019
    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal. I never realized that making an unchallenged statement to the press was "testifying."

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 23,637
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 23,637
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,159 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Oh I know what the script says O'Keefed. I'd be interested in hear Mueller answer the questions that aren't on the script.

    Did you look into the possibility that the Russians interfered in our election by providing disinformation that was paid for by Hillary and the DNC? Yes or No? And if no, why not? Wasn't the entire purpose of your investigation to look into Russian meddling in our election? Why did you ignore that?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 23,637
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    I suppose he was worthless to people he need a fucking road map to get to the bathroom.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 23,637
    SFGbob said:

    Oh I know what the script says O'Keefed. I'd be interested in hear Mueller answer the questions that aren't on the script.

    Did you look into the possibility that the Russians interfered in our election by providing disinformation that was paid for by Hillary and the DNC? Yes or No? And if no, why not? Wasn't the entire purpose of your investigation to look into Russian meddling in our election? Why did you ignore that?

    The Senate has subpoena power. Go for it!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited May 2019
    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    The shallow breathing and tightness in chest when Race and Bob-o post is palpable. Emotional investment confirmed. Rational line of mental processing in question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,159 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    I suppose he was worthless to people he need a fucking road map to get to the bathroom.
    Yes we needed a two plus year investigation and hundreds of thousands of documents and hundreds of hours of testimony so you need a fucking road map to discern the conclusion or lack thereof

    You skinny white rich smart people sure can sound stupid
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Gwad said:

    The shallow breathing and tightness in chest when Race and Bob-o post is palpable. Emotional investment confirmed. Rational line of mental processing in question.

    Yeah, just as I sense you sucking on a big fat cock right now. It's palpable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    I suppose he was worthless to people he need a fucking road map to get to the bathroom.
    Yes we needed a two plus year investigation and hundreds of thousands of documents and hundreds of hours of testimony so you need a fucking road map to discern the conclusion or lack thereof

    You skinny white rich smart people sure can sound stupid
    You sound upset.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    edited May 2019
    SFGbob said:

    Gwad said:

    The shallow breathing and tightness in chest when Race and Bob-o post is palpable. Emotional investment confirmed. Rational line of mental processing in question.

    Yeah, just as I sense you sucking on a big fat cock right now. It's palpable.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 23,637
    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.
    There it is, that world famous O'Keefed mind reading act. Always a fan favorite.

    What am I thinking right now O'Keefed?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,159 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Appears Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal so Mueller could read from the script and not face any uncomfortable questions. How much money did we pay Mueller and the fucker goes unquestioned on anything?

    Nadler spilled the beans last week when revealed why he thought Mueller didn't want to testify.


    Mueller doesn't want to testify publicly

    if the Republicans on the committee start asking him questions about the beginning of the — about this stuff, the beginning of the investigation.

    You and Race are being coy here. You’re both much more fearful of unscripted Mueller testimony than I am.
    Not even close

    Its pretty clear what Mueller did here to anyone other than the Muellertards

    Hi @CirrhosisDawg and @HHusky

    Mueller is scared and a pussy and a piece of shit

    I was right

    Again
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,159 Founders Club
    Gwad said:

    The shallow breathing and tightness in chest when Race and Bob-o post is palpable. Emotional investment confirmed. Rational line of mental processing in question.




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,159 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Mueller testified. It was just this morning.

    Yeah, not under oath and he didn't have to face any questions. Why it's almost as if Nadler and Mueller worked out a deal.
    Maybe. So?

    And you'd be totally fine with that, because you're all about "transparency" right O'Keefed?
    Mueller's report said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him.

    Mueller today said: I can't vindicate him. I can't prosecute him. Congress can prosecute him. (And the evidence is preserved if a prosecutor want to level charges after he's out of office too.)

    I suppose we could always listen to him say it again.

    Of course I disagree with him (and the DOJ) on one point: that anything in the Constitution says a sitting President can't be indicted. The Constitution is silent about that and we know that the only reason that became DOJ lore was because of a memo written to support the notion that the then sitting VP, Spiro Agnew, could be indicted.


    So Mueller was absolutely worthless. Got it. You guys wasted a lot of effort sucking his dick for two years. Sad

    We do in fact know that Trump could be indicted and Mueller could lay out things he could be indicted for. But he didn't because it isn't there. So he throws out some bullshit to the dupe and they lap it up

    Public Service Reminder - these are the smart people
    I suppose he was worthless to people he need a fucking road map to get to the bathroom.
    Yes we needed a two plus year investigation and hundreds of thousands of documents and hundreds of hours of testimony so you need a fucking road map to discern the conclusion or lack thereof

    You skinny white rich smart people sure can sound stupid
    You sound upset.
    Its all about transparency
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.