Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Mueller retiring and shutting down his office
Comments
-
Hey CD, what can't Nadler get Mueller to testify? I hear he can do anything he wants.CirrhosisDawg said:
I’m sure congress will take this opinion into consideration as it deliberates on the obstruction of justice issues.RaceBannon said:
It's been aired out for three yearsCirrhosisDawg said:
Let congress air it all out. You support transparency don’t you? If another infrastructure week has to be tossed aside, so be it.RaceBannon said:
Hey here is one of the ones who are born every minuteCirrhosisDawg said:
Mueller didn’t “lay it out?” I think we’ll be discussing that over, let’s say, the next few months. I’m sure your opinion will count too.RaceBannon said:
I think it means not guiltyallpurpleallgold said:
Do you really think “not guilty” means innocent?RaceBannon said:
It doesn't mean you get to imagine guilt where it doesn't exist
Mueller could have laid out whatever he wanted to. Face it, you all got played.
You fell for it.
Hth
You don't support transparency. -
Sounds like mueller is avoiding questions about the illegal dossier. Sad.SFGbob said:
Hey CD, what can't Nadler get Mueller to testify? I hear he can do anything he wants.CirrhosisDawg said:
I’m sure congress will take this opinion into consideration as it deliberates on the obstruction of justice issues.RaceBannon said:
It's been aired out for three yearsCirrhosisDawg said:
Let congress air it all out. You support transparency don’t you? If another infrastructure week has to be tossed aside, so be it.RaceBannon said:
Hey here is one of the ones who are born every minuteCirrhosisDawg said:
Mueller didn’t “lay it out?” I think we’ll be discussing that over, let’s say, the next few months. I’m sure your opinion will count too.RaceBannon said:
I think it means not guiltyallpurpleallgold said:
Do you really think “not guilty” means innocent?RaceBannon said:
It doesn't mean you get to imagine guilt where it doesn't exist
Mueller could have laid out whatever he wanted to. Face it, you all got played.
You fell for it.
Hth
You don't support transparency. -
You did with OJ.allpurpleallgold said:
Do you really think “not guilty” means innocent?RaceBannon said: -
Bob Mueller didn’t want to emulate Ken Starr? Gee, I can’t imagine why not.RaceBannon said: -
None said the dossier was illegal. But please continue to fuck that strawman's ass. You can pretend it's Hondo.CirrhosisDawg said:
Sounds like mueller is avoiding questions about the illegal dossier. Sad.SFGbob said:
Hey CD, what can't Nadler get Mueller to testify? I hear he can do anything he wants.CirrhosisDawg said:
I’m sure congress will take this opinion into consideration as it deliberates on the obstruction of justice issues.RaceBannon said:
It's been aired out for three yearsCirrhosisDawg said:
Let congress air it all out. You support transparency don’t you? If another infrastructure week has to be tossed aside, so be it.RaceBannon said:
Hey here is one of the ones who are born every minuteCirrhosisDawg said:
Mueller didn’t “lay it out?” I think we’ll be discussing that over, let’s say, the next few months. I’m sure your opinion will count too.RaceBannon said:
I think it means not guiltyallpurpleallgold said:
Do you really think “not guilty” means innocent?RaceBannon said:
It doesn't mean you get to imagine guilt where it doesn't exist
Mueller could have laid out whatever he wanted to. Face it, you all got played.
You fell for it.
Hth
You don't support transparency. -
Fucking pathetic.HHusky said:
Bob Mueller didn’t want to emulate Ken Starr? Gee, I can’t imagine why not.RaceBannon said:
-
Yes I am sure the guiding light for Mueller was to not emulate Ken Starr and find criminal wrongdoing
-
Eventually Mueller will be asked if, according to his own prosecutorial standard, would he indict a private citizen with the same evidence. All he has to say is "no." In the current climate, If he says "yes," it's a yes. If he punts on it, it's a yes.
-
Ken Starr actually nailed a sitting Gov. and it wasn't for a fucking process crime.RaceBannon said:Yes I am sure the guiding light for Mueller was to not emulate Ken Starr and find criminal wrongdoing
-
If Mueller has his way he will not answer any further questions on this. The only way he testifies further is if the House subpoena's him and Nadler isn't going to do that because he doesn't want the questions about the origins of this thing answered in public either.ramenduck said:Eventually Mueller will be asked if, according to his own prosecutorial standard, would he indict a private citizen with the same evidence. All he has to say is "no." In the current climate, If he says "yes," it's a yes. If he punts on it, it's a yes.
