Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fox New Pole: Voters favor increasing taxes on the rich

13

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,727 Standard Supporter
    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,486

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    And everyone can still evade the top rate by not earning enough.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    And everyone can still evade the top rate by not earning enough.
    What’s the tax rate if you lose 1.17 billion?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,727 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    No, every citizen making less pays less of a percentage. HTH
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    edited May 2019
    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    The Law. Maybe. But how about the advantages on the other side of the coin of being rich or born into it. In this world we all know that it isn’t what you know, it’s who you know. And by The Who, I mean the rich and powerful. Is it fair to the poor schlub that comes in 2nd for a sweet job or promotion that has more experience and is better fitted, loses to another dudes son/daughter who is golf buddies with the head of that department?

    Is it fair to the American people that most of our Congress actions are based on the wants of the people who donate most to their campaigns?

    Look I’m not goin Social here. I just happen to think that these people paying a little more to the masses instead of paying off their politician won’t hurt them. At all.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,727 Standard Supporter
    edited May 2019
    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    The Law. Maybe. But how about the advantages on the other side of the coin of being rich or born into it. In this world we all know that it isn’t what you know, it’s who you know. And by The Who, I mean the rich and powerful. Is it fair to the poor schlub that comes in 2nd for a sweet job or promotion that has more experience and is better fitted, loses to another dudes son/daughter who is golf buddies with the head of that department?

    Is it fair to the American people that most of our Congress actions are based on the wants of the people who donate most to their campaigns?

    Look I’m not goin Social here. I just happen to think that these people paying a little more to the masses instead of paying off their politician won’t hurt them. At all.
    Punishing success isn't the answer either. High taxes isn't going to stop "who you know" either.

    Congress is another story. Term limits! Making our elected officials millionaires isn't what they are there for.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited May 2019
    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    You used the term “fair”, slappy dick
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    You used the term “fair”, slappy dick
    Whoooooooossssshhhhh!!!!!
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    Guilty white socialist from Mercer Island @allpurpleallgold has spoken.

    Please continue to tell me how my family should think and vote! It shows you CARE!

    Or, is your white isolated privilege showing again?