Fox New Pole: Voters favor increasing taxes on the rich
Comments
-
I'm shocked, a majority of voters favor increasing a tax they won't pay.
-
SFGbob said:
I'm shocked, a majority of voters favor increasing a tax
theywe won't pay. -
Does anyone on here make eight figures? I kind of doubt it.
-
@thechatch true?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Does anyone on here make eight figures? I kind of doubt it.
-
Still not right. Isn't it odd how much envy is in the world right now.
-
Thanks for making the point.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Does anyone on here make eight figures? I kind of doubt it.
It’s hardly shocking that a majority will support a tax increase that they will never pay. -
Three commas or GTFO.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Does anyone on here make eight figures? I kind of doubt it.
-
Free sh*t is attractive? Go figure.
-
Probably the same people who want to get rid of Arabic Numerals...
-
People are stupid.
-
I hear when you're only a Millionaire, with an M, your doors only open out, not up.Doog_de_Jour said:
Three commas or GTFO.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Does anyone on here make eight figures? I kind of doubt it.
-
Yes, they are. And some people are stupider than other people. And we call those people Rat Party members.Swaye said:People are stupid.
-
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.SFGbob said:
Yes, they are. And some people are stupider than other people. And we call those people Rat Party members.Swaye said:People are stupid.
-
Got to love how you're such a fucking Kunt you can't even articulate what you feel is wrong with that sentence other than your belief that I've used the word "faith" incorrectly.allpurpleallgold said:
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.SFGbob said:
Yes, they are. And some people are stupider than other people. And we call those people Rat Party members.Swaye said:People are stupid.
On an anonymous message board you're too big a Kunt to back up your mouth. -
Reminds me of the time Lenin had a poll and everyone agreed to take all the wealth, kill the wealthy, and give it to the government so they could spend it on the people. Everyone agreed (except a few people).
-
It’s true.Alexis said:
I hear when you're only a Millionaire, with an M, your doors only open out, not up.Doog_de_Jour said:
Three commas or GTFO.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Does anyone on here make eight figures? I kind of doubt it.
-
Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.salemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.Sledog said:
Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.salemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
And everyone can still evade the top rate by not earning enough.allpurpleallgold said:
Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.Sledog said:
Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.salemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
What’s the tax rate if you lose 1.17 billion?HHusky said:
And everyone can still evade the top rate by not earning enough.allpurpleallgold said:
Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.Sledog said:
Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.salemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
No, every citizen making less pays less of a percentage. HTHallpurpleallgold said:
Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.Sledog said:
Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.salemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
The Law. Maybe. But how about the advantages on the other side of the coin of being rich or born into it. In this world we all know that it isn’t what you know, it’s who you know. And by The Who, I mean the rich and powerful. Is it fair to the poor schlub that comes in 2nd for a sweet job or promotion that has more experience and is better fitted, loses to another dudes son/daughter who is golf buddies with the head of that department?Sledog said:
Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.salemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
Is it fair to the American people that most of our Congress actions are based on the wants of the people who donate most to their campaigns?
Look I’m not goin Social here. I just happen to think that these people paying a little more to the masses instead of paying off their politician won’t hurt them. At all. -
Punishing success isn't the answer either. High taxes isn't going to stop "who you know" either.salemcoog said:
The Law. Maybe. But how about the advantages on the other side of the coin of being rich or born into it. In this world we all know that it isn’t what you know, it’s who you know. And by The Who, I mean the rich and powerful. Is it fair to the poor schlub that comes in 2nd for a sweet job or promotion that has more experience and is better fitted, loses to another dudes son/daughter who is golf buddies with the head of that department?Sledog said:
Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.salemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
Is it fair to the American people that most of our Congress actions are based on the wants of the people who donate most to their campaigns?
Look I’m not goin Social here. I just happen to think that these people paying a little more to the masses instead of paying off their politician won’t hurt them. At all.
Congress is another story. Term limits! Making our elected officials millionaires isn't what they are there for. -
You used the term “fair”, slappy dicksalemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
Whoooooooossssshhhhh!!!!!MikeDamone said:
You used the term “fair”, slappy dicksalemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
-
Guilty white socialist from Mercer Island @allpurpleallgold has spoken.allpurpleallgold said:
Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.Sledog said:
Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.salemcoog said:
What is the definition of fair?MikeDamone said:
Why is that “fair”?salemcoog said:Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.
Please continue to tell me how my family should think and vote! It shows you CARE!
Or, is your white isolated privilege showing again?
