Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Avenatti

2

Comments

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,695
    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    If you think Hopkins isn’t paying guys you’re fucking stupid. College basketball is the Wild West, and yes, no one cares. Kansas, Kentucky and duke are the 3 most blatant violators. If the NCAA started caring they’d torpedo their own product.

    Did I say anything about Hopkins? Go fuck yourself.

    If you think nike isn’t paying Oregon football players you’re fucking stupid. No way a top recruit goes to play for a mediocre unproven coach with getting paid. Idiot.
    Clearly aren’t paying enough. I’m pro-giving money to poor kids sacrificing their brains and long term health for our entertainment. If you’re not, fuck you
    Fuck that noise and fuck the kids.

    If they werent getting a football scholarship they'd be in jail.
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,269

    Yeah, I bet paying players $5000 each per year (or whatever a school like WSU could sustainably afford) would stop a kid from taking $100K for a year of hoops! Let's pay the players and solve everything!

    There is no way to pay the players their market value without widening the haves/have-nots gulf even further than it already is. You'd have to create a pay scale that EVERY school can afford, which just wouldn't be all that much. It wouldn't stop players from wanting/taking more than that "base salary." Ntxduck, you're conflating two separate problems that should both be addressed.

    No, I’m saying I’m cool with any school paying players under the table. I understand the impossibilities of a legal pay to play (esp cuz of title 9). If UW wants to start blatantly handing out 50k coffee cups to kids I’d be cool with that too. Always have been.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    ntxduck said:

    Yeah, I bet paying players $5000 each per year (or whatever a school like WSU could sustainably afford) would stop a kid from taking $100K for a year of hoops! Let's pay the players and solve everything!

    There is no way to pay the players their market value without widening the haves/have-nots gulf even further than it already is. You'd have to create a pay scale that EVERY school can afford, which just wouldn't be all that much. It wouldn't stop players from wanting/taking more than that "base salary." Ntxduck, you're conflating two separate problems that should both be addressed.

    No, I’m saying I’m cool with any school paying players under the table. I understand the impossibilities of a legal pay to play (esp cuz of title 9). If UW wants to start blatantly handing out 50k coffee cups to kids I’d be cool with that too. Always have been.
    Fair enough. It's a defensible position.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573

    ntxduck said:

    If you think Hopkins isn’t paying guys you’re fucking stupid. College basketball is the Wild West, and yes, no one cares. Kansas, Kentucky and duke are the 3 most blatant violators. If the NCAA started caring they’d torpedo their own product.

    Did I say anything about Hopkins? Go fuck yourself.

    If you think nike isn’t paying Oregon football players you’re fucking stupid. No way a top recruit goes to play for a mediocre unproven coach with getting paid. Idiot.
    Bitter isn’t a good look on you.

    I wouldn’t be shocked if 50% or more programs are doing it. And the ones that don’t do it, aren’t winning. Even a coach like Petersen who I think is completely against it, is susceptible to having a few boosters do this stuff without his knowledge. College atheletics is a dirty system, and with all the money flowing, the NCAA does not want to fuck with the gravy train.
  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986

    Yeah, I bet paying players $5000 each per year (or whatever a school like WSU could sustainably afford) would stop a kid from taking $100K for a year of hoops! Let's pay the players and solve everything!

    There is no way to pay the players their market value without widening the haves/have-nots gulf even further than it already is. You'd have to create a pay scale that EVERY school can afford, which just wouldn't be all that much. It wouldn't stop players from wanting/taking more than that "base salary." Ntxduck, you're conflating two separate problems that should both be addressed.

    Title IX ensures this will never happen.

    You would have SJW’s all over the fucking place shift their view from free college and absolving student loans to demanding the Women’s golf team get paid as much as Bama’s DE’s (Shoutout DDY!!).
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    ntxduck said:

    If you think Hopkins isn’t paying guys you’re fucking stupid. College basketball is the Wild West, and yes, no one cares. Kansas, Kentucky and duke are the 3 most blatant violators. If the NCAA started caring they’d torpedo their own product.

    Did I say anything about Hopkins? Go fuck yourself.

    If you think nike isn’t paying Oregon football players you’re fucking stupid. No way a top recruit goes to play for a mediocre unproven coach with getting paid. Idiot.
    Bitter isn’t a good look on you.

    I wouldn’t be shocked if 50% or more programs are doing it. And the ones that don’t do it, aren’t winning. Even a coach like Petersen who I think is completely against it, is susceptible to having a few boosters do this stuff without his knowledge. College atheletics is a dirty system, and with all the money flowing, the NCAA does not want to fuck with the gravy train.
    Fuck off.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    edited May 2019

    ntxduck said:

    If you think Hopkins isn’t paying guys you’re fucking stupid. College basketball is the Wild West, and yes, no one cares. Kansas, Kentucky and duke are the 3 most blatant violators. If the NCAA started caring they’d torpedo their own product.

    Did I say anything about Hopkins? Go fuck yourself.

    If you think nike isn’t paying Oregon football players you’re fucking stupid. No way a top recruit goes to play for a mediocre unproven coach with getting paid. Idiot.
    Bitter isn’t a good look on you.

    I wouldn’t be shocked if 50% or more programs are doing it. And the ones that don’t do it, aren’t winning. Even a coach like Petersen who I think is completely against it, is susceptible to having a few boosters do this stuff without his knowledge. College atheletics is a dirty system, and with all the money flowing, the NCAA does not want to fuck with the gravy train.
    Fuck off.
    New boared motto
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    edited May 2019
    Quooks still getting triggered with moneybag references? JFC...

    Lack of self awareness WTFs all around.

    Own your baggage already. Life is much better.


    Self Awareness Cliff Notes:

    -Petersen's OKG mantra limits recruiting potential and UW success.
    -Oregon pays players with the Swoosh to come to Eugene.

    Capiche?