Those needles littering the streets? Yeah, the city handed them out - religious left strikes again
Comments
-
She's not your type @salemcoogsalemcoog said:
The ariolas, the nipples, the yummy tummy and the perfect little CT. @TurdBomber wins the thread. @DerekJohnson, lock it down.TurdBomber said:
How long before you're responded to with "mass incarceration" or "Hitler" replies?PurpleThrobber said:
Look, you lefties want to keep riding the free needles is good bullshit, go ahead. It's not - you're enabling lawless behavior. But for the sake of argument, let's play that it's a "good" thing.HHusky said:
Tax revenue thought experiment: do people headed out to dinner who decide not to go to a restaurant in a particular location simply decide to stay home and spend no money instead?TurdBomber said:Add in the lost business and tax revenue in a retail and restaurant core that nobody patronizes anymore because of the overwhelming presence of sidewalk-shitting addicts, and you’re talking millions of dollars per month in revenue losses. Fuck Off Twice, you ignoramus.
If you want to sympathize with business owners affected, I'm with you, but your claims about tax revenues are a little ridiculous.
Needle exchanges save money overall and prevent epidemics. The Veep finally relented in Indiana, though his considerable, evidence free delay is blamed for a lot of deaths.
Even things that work can be improved. But you and blob are on the wrong side of this. Race is going to shoot up regardless. Do you really want him contracting HIV as a consequence?
If you're going to die on that sword, at least has the common sense to put the free needles where the rest of us law-abiding citizens can enjoy our law-abiding lives in peace without constantly getting fucked with by your 'must-have-free-needles to avoid the FBA" crowd shitting on the sidewalks, passing out in front of businesses and otherwise turning decent places into shitholes.
Fence off a designated area, pass out the free needles and let them shoot the fuck up all they want. Cordone off the lawless zone and don't let them out. Like taking away teenagers car keys at a house kegger so they don't hurt themselves or others.
Instead you want the zombies to roam around disrupting civilized society. Fuck that.
Oh, hey @PurpleThrobber: This ones for you.
Is that a Star of David necklace she's wearing?!?!?! -
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
Just wondered why he committed so many felonies before taking a month off to get clean.RaceBannon said:
Why?HHusky said:
Has anyone told Rush?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do? -
So the usual nothingHHusky said:
Just wondered why he committed so many felonies before taking a month off to get clean.RaceBannon said:
Why?HHusky said:
Has anyone told Rush?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
He quit using his free will. -
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
Humans respond to incentives. Positive and negative incentives. I'm more interested in good or effective policy than any of the ideological labels.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
Except that the concept of government as social engineer is outside of the premise of government as limited to protecting ones individual freedoms. Enumerated powers is a dead concept on the left.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
That's because all of the policies you advocate align with your ideological beliefs. Of course you don't care what label they carry.HHusky said:
Humans respond to incentives. Positive and negative incentives. I'm more interested in good or effective policy than any of the ideological labels.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
True. I am ideologically practical.UW_Doog_Bot said:
That's because all of the policies you advocate align with your ideological beliefs. Of course you don't care what label they carry.HHusky said:
Humans respond to incentives. Positive and negative incentives. I'm more interested in good or effective policy than any of the ideological labels.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess. -
Microsoft cockblocked my edit.HHusky said:
True. I am ideologicallyUW_Doog_Bot said:
That's because all of the policies you advocate align with your ideological beliefs. Of course you don't care what label they carry.HHusky said:
Humans respond to incentives. Positive and negative incentives. I'm more interested in good or effective policy than any of the ideological labels.YellowSnow said:
I don't think humans have as much free will as many on the right would like to believe. But we can also agree that humans respond really well to carrots and sticks. The problem with progressive policy is that it's all carrots and no sticks.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Sure, the difference being that real liberalism seeks to protect the small amount of free will individuals may have.YellowSnow said:
The correct answer is probably somewhere between free will and determinism. Neither extreme of the debate works for me.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The philosophy that individuals have no agency or free will is at the heart of progressivism.RaceBannon said:In this thread H argues that junkies have no choice or free will. Like Trump's brother who killed himself
In the other thread H argues that all you have to do is be born lucky and you'll end up a billionaire. Like Trump
As the saying goes, Kunt Logic - is there nothing it can't do?
Progressivism denies agency and seeks to eliminate any that we may possess.practicalretardedchallenged.
