Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Tuli PT

Beno4LifeBeno4Life Member Posts: 533
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
in Hardcore Husky Board
I was gonna ask this in the pod thread, but I figured this might actually get Coker’s attention.

He mentioned, along with others, that Taki flashed in spring ball and will probably be rotating w/ Levi, Benning, Bronson, and Clark.

It surprised me that Tuli wasn’t mentioned as much or at all, even though he was more of a DL than Taki in HS and was so highly rated. And based on the spring depth charts (seating charts whatever!) and the pod and Caple/Vorel/Daily UW reports (fuck you, Ektard The Plagerizer) , I didn’t see/hear Tuli’s name all that often.

Do you see Tuli on the same track as Taki or is he slower to develop?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Options
    FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes
    It takes time, it’s not a microwave popcorn
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,815
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs
    I suspect that the DL is still fluid

    The good news on D is that there is a TON of talented depth

    The bad is that it needs to sort itself out and into roles
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes
    Beno4Life said:

    I was gonna ask this in the pod thread, but I figured this might actually get Coker’s attention.

    He mentioned, along with others, that Taki flashed in spring ball and will probably be rotating w/ Levi, Benning, Bronson, and Clark.

    It surprised me that Tuli wasn’t mentioned as much or at all, even though he was more of a DL than Taki in HS and was so highly rated. And based on the spring depth charts (seating charts whatever!) and the pod and Caple/Vorel/Daily UW reports (fuck you, Ektard The Plagerizer) , I didn’t see/hear Tuli’s name all that often.

    Do you see Tuli on the same track as Taki or is he slower to develop?

    Good question and good post . Quick answer is it doesnt really matter. These guys wouldnt even be in 2 deeps if Peter didnt botch interior DL recruitingng so bad in 16-17. Both will be starting at some point. They both looked a lot quicker than I expected. Vea, Emtman came on as sophomores. No worries
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    This is why I only care about volume. I’m sure Tuli will be good, but when you get a LOT of good players one of them will sure be good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    huskyhooliganhuskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,073
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam
    He was actually pretty good in the spring thing. Caught my eye as someone who will be tough to block one on one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,474
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Tequilla said:

    GOAT said:

    Tequilla said:

    I suspect that the DL is still fluid

    The good news on D is that there is a TON of talented depth

    The bad is that it needs to sort itself out and into roles

    Please stop saying “I suspect” before every point you make
    I suspect you should go fuck yourself
    Tryhard heard from
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    animateanimate Member Posts: 4,231
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Nutrition lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    GOAT said:

    Tequilla said:

    I suspect that the DL is still fluid

    The good news on D is that there is a TON of talented depth

    The bad is that it needs to sort itself out and into roles

    Please stop saying “I suspect” before every point you make
    Imagine caring about this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    1to392831weretaken1to392831weretaken Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,302
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Tuli sure looked pretty damned good in the limited game time he got last season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,273
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment
    Standard Supporter
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    This is why I only care about volume. I’m sure Tuli will be good, but when you get a LOT of good players one of them will sure be good.

    Some focus on length. Others on Girth. Not DDY, he ensures satisfaction by needing the whole voluminous package.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,365
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    The D rotates three lines of DL. Tuli will play. Probably
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,333
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Tequilla said:

    GOAT said:

    Tequilla said:

    I suspect that the DL is still fluid

    The good news on D is that there is a TON of talented depth

    The bad is that it needs to sort itself out and into roles

    Please stop saying “I suspect” before every point you make
    I suspect you should go fuck yourself
    I suspect the golves are about ready to be dropped.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    jhfstyle24jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    HillsboroDuck said:

    ToddTurnerLIVES said:

    Not specifically a point about Tuli(some maybe I should just fuck off) but I think that if you are hearing ANYTHING about a redshirt freshman in spring then it's a sign that the player is doing pretty damn well. Redshirt freshman have only been on campus for 8-12 months and are 17 or 18 years old. The extra 5 months in the weights/nutrition program between now and the start of the season is going to do a lot for guys like Tuli, Spiker, Jackson Sirmon, etc.

    We heard a good amount about Lowe, Spiker and Osbourne this spring and I'm hopeful that they can take another step physically in the next 5 months.

    Good post but no RS freshman is 17 years old.
    Sama says hi. 16-year-old freshman = 17 year old RS freshman.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.