Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
OFFICIAL Philippines v Canada WAR thread
Comments
-
Decline and fall of the Royal Navy. Britain had 4 carriers in 1982 and 1 now. They were still at tuff Cold War ally in the 80's. Not so much anymore. Thatcher > May and it's not even close.RaceBannon said:
This requires explanationYellowSnow said:
Britain would lose that war now BTW.RaceBannon said:
https://www.maritime-executive.com/editorials/the-decline-of-the-royal-navy -
It's what happens to every country that adopts a Government run healthcare system.YellowSnow said:
Decline and fall of the Royal Navy. Britain had 4 carriers in 1982 and 1 now. They were still at tuff Cold War ally in the 80's. Not so much anymore. Thatcher > May and it's not even close.RaceBannon said:
This requires explanationYellowSnow said:
Britain would lose that war now BTW.RaceBannon said:
https://www.maritime-executive.com/editorials/the-decline-of-the-royal-navy
It sucks up every available dollar and it still delivers shitty care. -
Great photo opp. But MacArthur's return to the Philippines was a complete waste and did nothing to hasten Japan's surrender. Probably got a lot more Filipinos killed than would have otherwise been the case if we just left it on the vine to rot.RaceBannon said:
-
FDR thought it was good for morale
Mac thought it was good for Mac -
While our care is better for most Americans, we still face the same issue- i.e., spending on old people competing with defense dollars. In the 1950s we could devote a much larger percentage of GDP to defense than would ever be politically possible now because there was not Medicare of Medicaid yet and life expectancy was 60 ish.SFGbob said:
It's what happens to every country that adopts a Government run healthcare system.YellowSnow said:
Decline and fall of the Royal Navy. Britain had 4 carriers in 1982 and 1 now. They were still at tuff Cold War ally in the 80's. Not so much anymore. Thatcher > May and it's not even close.RaceBannon said:
This requires explanationYellowSnow said:
Britain would lose that war now BTW.RaceBannon said:
https://www.maritime-executive.com/editorials/the-decline-of-the-royal-navy
It sucks up every available dollar and it still delivers shitty care.
#freecigarettesforall!!! -
His only requirement is that he gets to keep his eyebrows. They can have everything else.USMChawk said:Justin Trudeau is already planning his surrender.
-
Sure. That was the gist. Just didn't help much to win the war is all I'm saying. That war was won based on 3 primary factors:RaceBannon said:FDR thought it was good for morale
Mac thought it was good for Mac
- Our? Boeing
- Submarines
- And the Ruskies throwing their hats in the ring
-
Guessed this might have been you're reason. Got four more?YellowSnow said:
Decline and fall of the Royal Navy. Britain had 4 carriers in 1982 and 1 now. They were still at tuff Cold War ally in the 80's. Not so much anymore. Thatcher > May and it's not even close.RaceBannon said:
This requires explanationYellowSnow said:
Britain would lose that war now BTW.RaceBannon said:
https://www.maritime-executive.com/editorials/the-decline-of-the-royal-navy -
I think kids today would be shocked at how managed the information was back then
-
I gave 2- i.e., military capability and political will.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Guessed this might have been you're reason. Got four more?YellowSnow said:
Decline and fall of the Royal Navy. Britain had 4 carriers in 1982 and 1 now. They were still at tuff Cold War ally in the 80's. Not so much anymore. Thatcher > May and it's not even close.RaceBannon said:
This requires explanationYellowSnow said:
Britain would lose that war now BTW.RaceBannon said:
https://www.maritime-executive.com/editorials/the-decline-of-the-royal-navy
I don't have 3 more reasons.
