Anyone who claims Banks can foreclose on people even when they're current on their mortgages is a dumbfuck.
I'd need to see the quote and the context.
Bob doesn't believe in context. He was just arguing with you that low income people don't pay any federal income tax. And ignored your comments that they do pay payroll taxes (and fuel tax, cigarette and alcohol taxes).
Anyone who claims Banks can foreclose on people even when they're current on their mortgages is a dumbfuck.
I'd need to see the quote and the context.
Bob doesn't believe in context. He was just arguing with you that low income people don't pay any federal income tax. And ignored your comments that they do pay payroll taxes (and fuel tax, cigarette and alcohol taxes).
Hondo likes to lie out his ass. How did I ignore it Hondo? Do you think I'm unaware that low income people pay sales taxes dumbfuck?
Hondo I realize that you're a fucking moron who doesn't even know that Medicare adds to the national debt but you shouldn't assume everyone else is a dumbfuck like you.
Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?
This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.
I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.
The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.
The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
Don't know if you've heard, but Clinton just took the lead in Arizona.
Maybe you are only looking at the polls that Trump tweets out at 3am?
Whoever brought this thread back up I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. It is a classic!
"Trump is Hugo Chavez", "Clinton just took the lead in Arizona".........priceless.
There are a boatload of companies, media, agencies, etc. that RARELY endorse a Presidential candidate but are in this election ...
The person that seemingly all of these people are endorsing is in a tight race with this person that is considered by so many to be unqualified for the job ...
What does that say about the other person in the race?
It says that Trump is such a fucktard, these organizations are willing to endorse a (D) to prevent him from getting close to the White House.
Great question.
That's obvious ...
But what I'm getting at is that if Trump was THAT bad why are 40-45% of the voting population dead set on voting for him?
Have you considered that to a large percentage of our population Hillary is viewed just as unfavorably and dangerous as Trump is by the other half of the population?
I'd say it breaks down roughly like this (the % below are of the Trump voting block):
25% will never vote (D) no matter what 25% will never vote for a woman, no matter what 25% hate blacks and view her as the husband of our first black prez, and SoS of our 2nd black prez 25% live in mobile homes and read the National Enquirer and watched The Apprentice on their "console TV sets" and are voting Trump because he is the only politician whose name they can remember
I won't disagree with your breakdown - it's a fairly accurate if not hurtful generalization.
But do the maff - Trump only has to snag a couple more percentage points out of the remainder who don't fall into that generalization and he's living in the White House.
Unless some major revelation comes out between now and election day, I don't see it happening. I think Clinton's team knows which states she needs to win, to take the electoral college, and she will win all of those, and a few more.
Trump will go back to hosting a TV show loved by the National Enquirer crowd.
Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?
This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.
I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.
Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?
This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.
I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.
The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.
The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
Don't know if you've heard, but Clinton just took the lead in Arizona.
Maybe you are only looking at the polls that Trump tweets out at 3am?
Comments
Hondo I realize that you're a fucking moron who doesn't even know that Medicare adds to the national debt but you shouldn't assume everyone else is a dumbfuck like you.
"Trump is Hugo Chavez", "Clinton just took the lead in Arizona".........priceless.