I think going from 9-4 to a Rose Bowl championship is a tougher rebuild than going from 0-12 to 7-6.
It's much harder to go from average to great than from shitty to average. I think Petersen has more on his plate than Sark did in 2009 because the goal now is Rose Bowls.
I think even the Doogs are tired of bullshit bowl games.
Really good article. It all sounds great, but we will have to wait and see. I do feel good about having a coach obsessed with detail and leaving no stone unturned when it comes to pursuing greatness. If he fails, it won't be from a lack of effort like Sark.
Really good article. It all sounds great, but we will have to wait and see. I do feel good about having a coach obsessed with detail and leaving no stone unturned when it comes to pursuing greatness. If he fails, it won't be from a lack of effort like Sark.
Really good article. It all sounds great, but we will have to wait and see. I do feel good about having a coach obsessed with detail and leaving no stone unturned when it comes to pursuing greatness. If he fails, it won't be from a lack of effort like Sark.
Yeah? well, 5 wins is the doog benchmark in year 1 at the 'new' Washington, followed by the glory of 7, 7, 7.....
I think going from 9-4 to a Rose Bowl championship is a tougher rebuild than going from 0-12 to 7-6.
It's much harder to go from average to great than from shitty to average. I think Petersen has more on his plate than Sark did in 2009 because the goal now is Rose Bowls.
I think even the Doogs are tired of bullshit bowl games.
I don't know I think [Deleted User] makes some good points
Comments
I thought starting over was when you go 0-12?
It's much harder to go from average to great than from shitty to average. I think Petersen has more on his plate than Sark did in 2009 because the goal now is Rose Bowls.
I think even the Doogs are tired of bullshit bowl games.
Ahhhhhthankyou
As others have said, it's clear that we have an adult running the program now.
If there's a reason to doog it up, that's the reason.