Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
You know who really did collude with Putin and the Russians to undermine...
Comments
-
How did did Trump obstruct justice? He fired Comey, Mueller was appointed two weeks later and the investigation that all you Kunts wanted was conducted. Was Mueller not given all the resources he needed to conduct his investigation? Was Mueller harassed and intimidated by Trump? Did Trump encourage people not to cooperate with Mueller? How exactly was justice obstructed?
-
There was NO LEGAL REASON FOR THE INVESTIGATION. NO CRIME OR EVIDENCE OF A CRIME. All based on a made up story paid for by the opoosition and assisted by the sitting opposition president AG, DOJ, FBI etc.HHusky said:
It is absolute bullshit to argue that one cannot obstruct justice in the absence of a crime. It is Bill Barr’s position however. Why do you think he got the job?Sledog said:
You forget there is an absence of a crime. You can not have obstruction without the underlying crime that is being investigated. Every part of this investigation is based on lies paid for by your gal Hillary, Sure sounds like fruit of the poisonous tree to me. But then you and Schiff probably spoon.HHusky said:
Barr made a decision not to charge Daddy. It may even have been a good decision. There would have been no decision to make absent evidence of guilt.Sledog said:
Same thing prove me wrong. Barr did because Mueller is a pussy who wouldn't make a statement knowing full well that he can't bring charges. He passed it to Barr and Barr made the correct decision. Therefore Trump was cleared and Mueller had nothing to with it. So who fucking cares what Mueller said.HHusky said:Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
Guess who Mueller's boss is?
"In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."
Law enforcement doesn't get to just start investigating people. That's KGB, MSS level shit.
Call up your local PD and see if you can have them start an investigation on your neighbor without a crime being committed.
I am still waiting for information on exactly what the obstruction was? Spell it out. Link it. Copy pasta. Something. You Hillary shills have bupkis. I laid out the requirements to file the charges and there is nothing that fits those parameters. So you and Hondo Shills Inc. all put your little heads together and post up you obstruction proof.
I'll wait right here. -
Madam, Daddy isn’t being charged and not one of us has read the Mueller Report. If you want to know why Mueller couldn’t exonerate him, you’re in the same position as the rest of us.SFGbob said:How did did Trump obstruct justice? He fired Comey, Mueller was appointed two weeks later and the investigation that all you Kunts wanted was conducted. Was Mueller not given all the resources he needed to conduct his investigation? Was Mueller harassed and intimidated by Trump? Did Trump encourage people not to cooperate with Mueller? How exactly was justice obstructed?
-
So you have no answers just a lot of mouth. Should a Kunt who claimed Obama was fiscally responsible really be giving anyone else shit about their "Daddy?" I didn't vote for Trump but I support him now but I defy you to find a single lie as half as big as the one you told yourself about Obama's fiscal responsibility that I've told on behalf of Trump.
You were Obama's A-number one blow job boy O'Keefed. -
I must concede not being willing to answer a set of dishonestly posed, shrieking interrogatories, blob.
-
How did did Trump obstruct justice? He fired Comey, Mueller was appointed two weeks later and the investigation that all you Kunts wanted was conducted. Was Mueller not given all the resources he needed to conduct his investigation? Was Mueller harassed and intimidated by Trump? Did Trump encourage people not to cooperate with Mueller? How exactly was justice obstructed?HHusky said:I must concede not being willing to answer a set of dishonestly posed, shrieking interrogatories, blob.
Yes, yes Kunt. It's so "dishonest" of me to ask questions you're too big a Kunt to answer. But you screaming about obstruction that you can't even identify that's not dishonest. -
Manic phase?
-
Kunt phase? Are you ever not in the Kunt phase?HHusky said:Manic phase?
-
Firing Comey isn't obstruction. Comey was a liar.SFGbob said:
How did did Trump obstruct justice? He fired Comey, Mueller was appointed two weeks later and the investigation that all you Kunts wanted was conducted. Was Mueller not given all the resources he needed to conduct his investigation? Was Mueller harassed and intimidated by Trump? Did Trump encourage people not to cooperate with Mueller? How exactly was justice obstructed?HHusky said:I must concede not being willing to answer a set of dishonestly posed, shrieking interrogatories, blob.
Yes, yes Kunt. It's so "dishonest" of me to ask questions you're too big a Kunt to answer. But you screaming about obstruction that you can't even identify that's not dishonest. -
Barr won’t prosecute. You don’t need to be so upset.
-
Prosecute for something you can't even identify. Yeah, that Barr is in the bag.HHusky said:Barr won’t prosecute. You don’t need to be so upset.
-
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said: -
Hypocrisy has always been one of O'Keefed better qualities.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said: -
W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said: -
So you are bashing the DOJ nowHHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Got it -
Predictable how quick this Kunt dropped Collusion.HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said: -
Now it's all about Obstruction that he can't even identify and it's "dishonest" to ask him to even speculate what that obstruction might look like.
Not to worry though, even after the report is released and there is no basis for obstruction the O'keefed Kunt will just move onto a new line of bullshit. -
Where did that fucking goalpost go?SFGbob said:
Predictable how quick this Kunt dropped Collusion.HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said: -
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said: -
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said: -
What goal posts? You were all over how Trump had colluded with Putin. You've now dropped that and moved to a charge of obstruction the Mueller himself declined to make a determination on.HHusky said:
Where did that fucking goalpost go?SFGbob said:
Predictable how quick this Kunt dropped Collusion.HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
What the fuck is Barr supposed to do? The guy who had been investigating this for two years refuses to come to a determination on obstruction and tosses in in Barr's lap. Barr decides and Kunt like you get to whine about. If you want cry, cry about your boy Mueller. -
HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
-
-
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory. -
It’s not a coverup, blob. Barr was very direct about his feelings. Yours are transparent too. Try to be happy. Daddy hasn’t been charged with anything yet.SFGbob said:
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory. -
YellowSnow said:
@Southerndawg here's what I walk back in hindsight: I was trying to stir with pot with a little humor and thought the kid looked like a troll without seeing the whole story. Again, I don't think getting it wrong once in a while in the Tug has the same equivalence as real life- e.g., I don't have a Twitter account, nor do I ever discuss politics on social media. My critique of the MAGA hat at the pro life rally is that to me the point of demonstrating should be to win hearts and minds to your cause. But in this case, anyone that likes your MAGA hat already agrees with you.Southerndawg said:
I agree, you are respectful of others in here, kudos for that, seriously. And I mean no disrespect, but again, IMHO you're not owning up to your intent. IMO, the tagline for your post regarding the Covington Catholic story was an attempt to use humor to mask your intent. You loathe Trump and folks who show their support for him by wearing a silly hat, which by the way was probably more fitting than not at a pro-life rally since Trump is pro-life and that is a pro-Trump hat. You (and you weren't alone) were very quick to judge the kid, who turned out to be the real victim of hatred from a relentless press and social media attacks, up to and including the doxing of he and his family so as to extend the harassment to his doorstep. Walking back your hasty judgement of the kid and/or owning up to a bit of Trump Derangement Syndrome seems fitting, but that's just me. Either way, cheers, you are one of the better poasters in this hive of villainous scum.YellowSnow said:
No you c'mon @Southerndawg . Yes, I've been very open about my loathing up Trump. But I have tried to be as respectful of others as I can in the Tug. Rarely do you see me WTF another's post. I've made an effort not to personally attack any poster here unless they come at me first. I mean fuck, I've hardly posted in the tug at all in the past 6 months. (the thread I started with the MAGA kids was as joke with @swaye . So I made one comment initially about how he looked to be trolling the old Indian. What was I supposed to walk back? I stand by the statement that wearing MAGA hats to a pro life rally isn't a good look).Southerndawg said:
C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.YellowSnow said:
Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.RaceBannon said:
You're saying it nowYellowSnow said:
Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.RaceBannon said:
Everything he did?YellowSnow said:
They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.SFGbob said:His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.
Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.
http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk
The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.
Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt
And you're running cover
Rally's are more about solidarity and motiving a group of like minded people than they are about winning the hearts and minds of those who oppose the rally's cause. How many Hillary Clinton voters do you suppose were swayed to vote for Trump by a Trump Rally? And vice versa? Anyway, we'll have to agree to disagree on this point, but IMHO, the MAGA hat fit right in at a pro-life rally and the kid had every right to wear it along with the expectation that he'd not be harassed as a result.
By the way, that's a pretty light mea culpa, but again, either way, cheers!
-
You'd think after 2 years they'd have found something. Nothing. Nada. Zip. Bupkis. Your meltdown is a wonderful thing. But but but but but but but RUSSIA!HHusky said:
It’s not a coverup, blob. Barr was very direct about his feelings. Yours are transparent too. Try to be happy. Daddy hasn’t been charged with anything yet.SFGbob said:
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory. -
The dance of the Kunt continues. Why didn't Mueller come up with a determination to prosecute Trump for obstruction Kunt? Is that question that fucking tough for you?HHusky said:
It’s not a coverup, blob. Barr was very direct about his feelings. Yours are transparent too. Try to be happy. Daddy hasn’t been charged with anything yet.SFGbob said:
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory.
If Mueller knew that Barr was never going to prosecute and he punted the decision to Barr anyway then Mueller had to be in on conspiracy. I realize that a dumbfuck who thinks Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away isn't real big on simple facts and logic but you still haven't answered the question.
Mueller declined to make a determination and to apply the law and left it entirely up to Barr, seems like you should be mad a Mueller Kunt. Wasn't that Mueller's job? To make a prosecutorial judgment if the law had been broken? So why are you blaming Barr? That wasn't Barr's job that was Mueller's. -
Yet you still call Hillary a criminal after they decided what she did was not prosecutable.. How are you a political shill again?SFGbob said:
The dance of the Kunt continues. Why didn't Mueller come up with a determination to prosecute Trump for obstruction Kunt? Is that question that fucking tough for you?HHusky said:
It’s not a coverup, blob. Barr was very direct about his feelings. Yours are transparent too. Try to be happy. Daddy hasn’t been charged with anything yet.SFGbob said:
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory.
If Mueller knew that Barr was never going to prosecute and he punted the decision to Barr anyway then Mueller had to be in on conspiracy. I realize that a dumbfuck who thinks Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away isn't real big on simple facts and logic but you still haven't answered the question.
Mueller declined to make a determination and to apply the law and left it entirely up to Barr, seems like you should be mad a Mueller Kunt. Wasn't that Mueller's job? To make a prosecutorial judgment if the law had been broken? So why are you blaming Barr? That wasn't Barr's job that was Mueller's.
