Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

So there were no indictments of the people who were spied up by our Federal Government

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
in Tug Tavern
Carter Page was wire-tapped and spied upon by the Obama DOJ for what?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 37,204 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Carter Page was wire-tapped and spied upon by the Obama DOJ for what?

    Because Obama approved it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,120 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 37,204 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    They couldn't go through every email she erased them. They still haven't recovered them all. Don't forget she erased them after she received a subpoena to produce them. But you keep sucking her dick,
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,120 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    El oh El. In Race's world, it's ok to investigate Democrats but Republicans are always right and it's overreach of government to investigate them.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,120 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    El oh El. In Race's world, it's ok to investigate Democrats but Republicans are always right and it's overreach of government to investigate them.
    But but but

    Why are you changing the subject?

    El oh el
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,335 Founders Club
    edited March 2019
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    El oh El. In Race's world, it's ok to investigate Democrats but Republicans are always right and it's overreach of government to investigate them.
    But but but

    Why are you changing the subject?

    El oh el
    That's what #aclockworkshill does. Obfuscate, deflect, deny ....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    El oh El. In Race's world, it's ok to investigate Democrats but Republicans are always right and it's overreach of government to investigate them.
    But but but

    Why are you changing the subject?

    El oh el
    It's right on subject. Why are you ignoring that you are a partisan shill.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,335 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    El oh El. In Race's world, it's ok to investigate Democrats but Republicans are always right and it's overreach of government to investigate them.
    But but but

    Why are you changing the subject?

    El oh el
    It's right on subject. Why are you ignoring that you are a partisan shill.
    The requirements for calling someone else a shill is having yourself displayed critical thinking ability at least one time.

    Therefore, you should shut the fuck up and light yourself on fire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    El oh El. In Race's world, it's ok to investigate Democrats but Republicans are always right and it's overreach of government to investigate them.
    But but but

    Why are you changing the subject?

    El oh el
    It's right on subject. Why are you ignoring that you are a partisan shill.
    The requirements for calling someone else a shill is having yourself displayed critical thinking ability at least one time.

    Therefore, you should shut the fuck up and light yourself on fire.
    From the dude who's doing a victory lap the last 20 hours shouting about how Trump had nothing at all to do in any way with Russia.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,120 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    El oh El. In Race's world, it's ok to investigate Democrats but Republicans are always right and it's overreach of government to investigate them.
    But but but

    Why are you changing the subject?

    El oh el
    It's right on subject. Why are you ignoring that you are a partisan shill.
    Why are you changing the subject?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    RaceBannon said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Who was wiretapped?
    Does going through every email not count?
    Still butthurt and angry over Benghazi I see

    So who was wiretapped? If nothing came from the hearing why are you still obsessed over it

    Why are you changing the subject?
    El oh El. In Race's world, it's ok to investigate Democrats but Republicans are always right and it's overreach of government to investigate them.
    But but but

    Why are you changing the subject?

    El oh el
    It's right on subject. Why are you ignoring that you are a partisan shill.
    The requirements for calling someone else a shill is having yourself displayed critical thinking ability at least one time.

    Therefore, you should shut the fuck up and light yourself on fire.
    From the dude who's doing a victory lap the last 20 hours shouting about how Trump had nothing at all to do in any way with Russia.
    Why angry?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Hondo when he heard about the Mueller report.. Apologies if this has been posted before.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wDYNVH0U3cs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,120 Founders Club
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    I chuckle at what a dumbfuck you are by thinking an investigation that wasn’t a criminal investigation failed to come up with a criminal indictment.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Btw, feel the love Hondo has for civil rights and civil liberties.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Btw, feel the love Hondo has for civil rights and civil liberties.
    Bob is ok with spying on Democrats. But spying on Republicans is a violation if civil liberties.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 37,204 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Do you actually think law enforcement has a 100% rate of spying on people and getting an indictment?

    That being said, I do chuckle. I'm sure at the end of the multiple Benghazi investigations you said the exact same thing. When they turned up nothing.

    Btw, feel the love Hondo has for civil rights and civil liberties.
    Bob is ok with spying on Democrats. But spying on Republicans is a violation if civil liberties.
    When's the democrat spying begin?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.