Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Seven members of Trump’s team have used unofficial communication tools
Comments
-
Who cares
Republicans are evil old white men. Dems pretend to be the saviors of humanity blessed with the strongest of moral compasses. -
Pathological liar2001400ex said:
About zero. I said it's fucked up. And defended the lies such as people hacking her server. Which they didn't. And it got investigated for two years.RaceBannon said:
How many times did you defend deleting emails?2001400ex said:
How many times did you scream about deleted emails again? Partisan kunt.SFGbob said:
So the “sensitive” material may be their tee times.2001400ex said:
We don't know what sensitive material they are discussing because they can't recall the messages. Everyone else here understood that but you.SFGbob said:
Shocking I never got an answer to this. With all of this phony OUTRAGE you would have thought one of these Kunts could have answered this question.SFGbob said:
What was the "sensitive material" they were discussing?insinceredawg said:
I didn't say they're the same. I said if you are concerned about the security risk of Hillary's server then you should also be concerned about the Trump admin using personal email to conduct official business. Using personal email to discuss sensitive material is a bigger national security risk than a private e-mail server.SFGbob said:
Who the fuck thinks that using it is just like having your own private email server? Stupid people, that's who.MariotaTheGawd said:Who the fuck still uses Yahoo mail by the way? Old people, that's who
OUTRAGE
Your point? -
2001400ex said:
About zero. I said it's fucked up. And defended the lies such as people hacking her server. Which they didn't. And it got investigated for two years.RaceBannon said:
How many times did you defend deleting emails?2001400ex said:
How many times did you scream about deleted emails again? Partisan kunt.SFGbob said:
So the “sensitive” material may be their tee times.2001400ex said:
We don't know what sensitive material they are discussing because they can't recall the messages. Everyone else here understood that but you.SFGbob said:
Shocking I never got an answer to this. With all of this phony OUTRAGE you would have thought one of these Kunts could have answered this question.SFGbob said:
What was the "sensitive material" they were discussing?insinceredawg said:
I didn't say they're the same. I said if you are concerned about the security risk of Hillary's server then you should also be concerned about the Trump admin using personal email to conduct official business. Using personal email to discuss sensitive material is a bigger national security risk than a private e-mail server.SFGbob said:
Who the fuck thinks that using it is just like having your own private email server? Stupid people, that's who.MariotaTheGawd said:Who the fuck still uses Yahoo mail by the way? Old people, that's who
OUTRAGE
Your point?
"In fact, the overlooked bombshell of the report is the inspector general’s confirmation that classified information contained in Clinton’s emails was in fact compromised by foreign intelligence services, and that Clinton had recklessly emailed President Barack Obama using her unsecured personal email from the territory of a hostile foreign adversary."
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-thiessen-hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-comey-0621-20180620-story.html
Obama also emailed Hillary from a private account to her private account under a false name.
Fuck off! -
Call me when there’s evidence of deleted emails2001400ex said:
How many times did you scream about deleted emails again? Partisan kunt.SFGbob said:
So the “sensitive” material may be their tee times.2001400ex said:
We don't know what sensitive material they are discussing because they can't recall the messages. Everyone else here understood that but you.SFGbob said:
Shocking I never got an answer to this. With all of this phony OUTRAGE you would have thought one of these Kunts could have answered this question.SFGbob said:
What was the "sensitive material" they were discussing?insinceredawg said:
I didn't say they're the same. I said if you are concerned about the security risk of Hillary's server then you should also be concerned about the Trump admin using personal email to conduct official business. Using personal email to discuss sensitive material is a bigger national security risk than a private e-mail server.SFGbob said:
Who the fuck thinks that using it is just like having your own private email server? Stupid people, that's who.MariotaTheGawd said:Who the fuck still uses Yahoo mail by the way? Old people, that's who
OUTRAGE -
After they got a subpoena for them along with the phones and texts.SFGbob said:
Call me when there’s evidence of deleted emails2001400ex said:
How many times did you scream about deleted emails again? Partisan kunt.SFGbob said:
So the “sensitive” material may be their tee times.2001400ex said:
We don't know what sensitive material they are discussing because they can't recall the messages. Everyone else here understood that but you.SFGbob said:
Shocking I never got an answer to this. With all of this phony OUTRAGE you would have thought one of these Kunts could have answered this question.SFGbob said:
What was the "sensitive material" they were discussing?insinceredawg said:
I didn't say they're the same. I said if you are concerned about the security risk of Hillary's server then you should also be concerned about the Trump admin using personal email to conduct official business. Using personal email to discuss sensitive material is a bigger national security risk than a private e-mail server.SFGbob said:
Who the fuck thinks that using it is just like having your own private email server? Stupid people, that's who.MariotaTheGawd said:Who the fuck still uses Yahoo mail by the way? Old people, that's who
OUTRAGE -
Lock ‘em up! Lock ‘em up! Lock ‘em up!
Amiright? -
I have a new avatar for you. You need a minor name change.BennyBeaver said:Lock ‘em up! Lock ‘em up! Lock ‘em up!
Amiright?
-
Very alliterative. 👍🏼Sledog said:
I have a new avatar for you. You need a minor name change.BennyBeaver said:Lock ‘em up! Lock ‘em up! Lock ‘em up!
Amiright? -
Is there really a difference between deleting messages and deleting texts? Such the partisan Bob.SFGbob said:
Call me when there’s evidence of deleted emails2001400ex said:
How many times did you scream about deleted emails again? Partisan kunt.SFGbob said:
So the “sensitive” material may be their tee times.2001400ex said:
We don't know what sensitive material they are discussing because they can't recall the messages. Everyone else here understood that but you.SFGbob said:
Shocking I never got an answer to this. With all of this phony OUTRAGE you would have thought one of these Kunts could have answered this question.SFGbob said:
What was the "sensitive material" they were discussing?insinceredawg said:
I didn't say they're the same. I said if you are concerned about the security risk of Hillary's server then you should also be concerned about the Trump admin using personal email to conduct official business. Using personal email to discuss sensitive material is a bigger national security risk than a private e-mail server.SFGbob said:
Who the fuck thinks that using it is just like having your own private email server? Stupid people, that's who.MariotaTheGawd said:Who the fuck still uses Yahoo mail by the way? Old people, that's who
OUTRAGE -
Is there really a difference between destroying evidence and not destroying evidence?2001400ex said:
Is there really a difference between deleting messages and deleting texts? Such the partisan Bob.SFGbob said:
Call me when there’s evidence of deleted emails2001400ex said:
How many times did you scream about deleted emails again? Partisan kunt.SFGbob said:
So the “sensitive” material may be their tee times.2001400ex said:
We don't know what sensitive material they are discussing because they can't recall the messages. Everyone else here understood that but you.SFGbob said:
Shocking I never got an answer to this. With all of this phony OUTRAGE you would have thought one of these Kunts could have answered this question.SFGbob said:
What was the "sensitive material" they were discussing?insinceredawg said:
I didn't say they're the same. I said if you are concerned about the security risk of Hillary's server then you should also be concerned about the Trump admin using personal email to conduct official business. Using personal email to discuss sensitive material is a bigger national security risk than a private e-mail server.SFGbob said:
Who the fuck thinks that using it is just like having your own private email server? Stupid people, that's who.MariotaTheGawd said:Who the fuck still uses Yahoo mail by the way? Old people, that's who
OUTRAGE -
BennyBeaver said:
Acutely alliterative. 👍🏼Sledog said:
I have a new avatar for you. You need a minor name change.BennyBeaver said:Lock ‘em up! Lock ‘em up! Lock ‘em up!
Amiright?
