Pac12podcast with fetters ...

I listened. Here’s a brief recap:

- Gushing by the hosts over Fetters’ beard (not kidding)
- QB Hawt Talk
- Needless elaboration of what an OKG is
- Having a joke about gaining an advantage in the snow/WSU go right over his head
- Why we struggle recruiting blue chip TEs (Reason #4 Will Shock You!!!!)

Doog_de_Jour said:

I listened. Here’s a brief recap:

- Gushing by the hosts over Fetters’ beard (not kidding)
- QB Hawt Talk
- Needless elaboration of what an OKG is
- Having a joke about gaining an advantage in the snow/WSU go right over his head
- Why we struggle recruiting blue chip TEs (Reason #4 Will Shock You!!!!)

+ the fight is over, the crud has won

Neighbor2972 said:

Everyone has been talking about Eason's 'physical intangibles'

I’m sure 81% of HH members aren’t sure what intangible means and why this is hilarious, so:

The mob at Doogman disagree with everything all of you have said:

"I’ve listened to all the Podcast of Champions interviews of the 247 reps for each Pac-12 team. Fetters is by far the best. It’s not even close. We are lucky to have such a dedicated team at DM. Thanks Chris."

"I agree. I can’t think of a time that I have heard Fetters fall on his face during an interview. He does a tremendous job with his questions and answers and doesn’t seem to get rattled when challenged."

"Fetters has a very high IQ and good communication skills, doesn't say "uhhh", "umm" or "like" much either - which is a breath of fresh air."

"Sky high. Upper tier of Mensa type stuff."

"Fetters has single-handedly kept this site afloat for years. I hope they are paying him accordingly. In my opinion, he needs to be paid as much or more than everyone else combined. I am surprised he is still here and not working for Sports Illustrated, the Boston Globe, ESPN or CBS Sports. He, along with Bob Condotta, have been bright stars among a remarkably poor Seattle sports media. (Most of them are just not very smart.)"

"Fetters is the best! Probably doesn’t want my endorsement but that makes it even better "

"Would it surprise anyone if Fetters turned down major opportunities from several of those media giants you mentioned? Looking from the outside, it's mind-blowing how one Dawgman competitor after another has fallen by the wayside when trying to match wits with Chris Fetters."

"I agree!! He’s gotten a lot of reps being on radio and he’s great every time I hear him!!"

"Well, Yeah !! He's a Whitty, after all."

"Fetters is to Dawgman what Lake is to the Huskies."

"Chris is the coach Pete of the Dawgman crew and the Dawgman crew are great assistant coaches."

"Kim is the AD, Chris is the head coach."

"Fetters is a sharp cookie. I always look at his dawgman staff prediction first!"





By my count that is 13 Fatters alts over on Doogman. That or 13 people that didn't listen to him ramble on end for minutes at a time, give a complete bullshit description of OKG, misunderstand what intangibles are, or dodge a question on why UW can't recruit an elite tight end by explaining for 5 minutes how the TE position has morphed into one that is focused on physical specimens who can catch and UW wants to find guys that can play either defensive end (not a position in Lake/Kwat defense) or tight end so they can move them around and be flexible if needed, ala Will Dissly and likely Draco Bynum here shortly.

PM to Doogman board members (I know you read this site):

"Fetters, Jude...the CNN of husky football"

Who's worse, Adam Jude or Chris Fetters? One, a sleazy Jim Acosta type, trying to produce a 'gotcha moment' on Chris Petersen, the other a typical low-budget writer for 20 years, trying to be relevant. One for the Seattle Times (a husky-hating Barbara Hedges lover, title IX advocate , trying desperately for 30 years to destroy husky football in favor of womens' basketball and softball)...the other a politically correct, totalitarian-run website , where Kim Grinolds (the content boss) ban's any user he disagree's with regarding husky football. For instance, if you don't like the way Jake Browning is playing, don't say a word...you'll be looking for a new platform like Hardcore Husky to convey your views and opinions. HardcoreHusky.com let's you speak your mind, share your opinions without permanent banishment from the website. Oh, it's free to join too. Derek Johnson, the CEO, is a true and lifelong husky fan who encourages passionate discussion of husky football

Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.

He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER.
He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.

Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.

Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )

The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.

USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.

Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....

So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.

And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then .
Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!

-Puppylove

NEsnake12 said:

I’d learn more about Husky football listening to a TSIO pod dedicated entirely to taint licking techniques than I would listenening to Fetters

*wheels turning*