"Illegal Immigrants and Crime – Assessing the Evidence"
Comments
-
Knock yourself out. File an amicus brief.RaceBannon said:
Then its not a censusCirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.RaceBannon said:
Why do we want them to respond? A census is to count citizens2001400ex said:
No. They are afraid if you put that question on there, illegals won't respond. Idiot.Sledog said:This is the reason they are fighting putting immigration status on the census forms. They don't want us to know the damage they have done to our nation.
-
Judge shopping is always special.CirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.RaceBannon said:
Why do we want them to respond? A census is to count citizens2001400ex said:
No. They are afraid if you put that question on there, illegals won't respond. Idiot.Sledog said:This is the reason they are fighting putting immigration status on the census forms. They don't want us to know the damage they have done to our nation.
-
Good luck on the appeal. For now, the citizenship question is unconstitutional.Sledog said:
Judge shopping is always special.CirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.RaceBannon said:
Why do we want them to respond? A census is to count citizens2001400ex said:
No. They are afraid if you put that question on there, illegals won't respond. Idiot.Sledog said:This is the reason they are fighting putting immigration status on the census forms. They don't want us to know the damage they have done to our nation.
-
Then how was in on the census from inception until the 60's?CirrhosisDawg said:
Good luck on the appeal. For now, the citizenship question is unconstitutional.Sledog said:
Judge shopping is always special.CirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.RaceBannon said:
Why do we want them to respond? A census is to count citizens2001400ex said:
No. They are afraid if you put that question on there, illegals won't respond. Idiot.Sledog said:This is the reason they are fighting putting immigration status on the census forms. They don't want us to know the damage they have done to our nation.
Oh yeah Commies have a different history. -
You should sign race’s amicus brief. It will make you feel better.Sledog said:
Then how was in on the census from inception until the 60's?CirrhosisDawg said:
Good luck on the appeal. For now, the citizenship question is unconstitutional.Sledog said:
Judge shopping is always special.CirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.RaceBannon said:
Why do we want them to respond? A census is to count citizens2001400ex said:
No. They are afraid if you put that question on there, illegals won't respond. Idiot.Sledog said:This is the reason they are fighting putting immigration status on the census forms. They don't want us to know the damage they have done to our nation.
Oh yeah Commies have a different history. -
I see you answered the question.CirrhosisDawg said:
You should sign race’s amicus brief. It will make you feel better.Sledog said:
Then how was in on the census from inception until the 60's?CirrhosisDawg said:
Good luck on the appeal. For now, the citizenship question is unconstitutional.Sledog said:
Judge shopping is always special.CirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.RaceBannon said:
Why do we want them to respond? A census is to count citizens2001400ex said:
No. They are afraid if you put that question on there, illegals won't respond. Idiot.Sledog said:This is the reason they are fighting putting immigration status on the census forms. They don't want us to know the damage they have done to our nation.
Oh yeah Commies have a different history.
I think you need a new country. Mexico? Oh wait you already live there. -
The Trial Court, in other words. BFD.LowIQCirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.
With the 9th Circuit C of Apps being the most frequently reversed of all U.S. circuit courts, it's legal malpractice to rely on any decision from a California trial court withstanding the scrutiny of actual judges whom understand the law.
California courts are the laughing stock of modern jurisprudence.
Herein fail not at your peril. -
I'm sure this family is all for sanctuary laws.
If it saves just one life, isn't it worth it?
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/03/11/police-arrest-suspect-in-murder-of-south-san-jose-woman/?fbclid=IwAR1xLMUzf8UT8I4Wb8Om-BCYrwQCGxCPQ53eLuNND43vJZT6LvM3KKTCY1g -
California trial court? Jfc, once again, you are an imbecile. The “US” in US district court should have been your first clue that this is not a California court. This was a federal court. I look forward to hearing your keen legal insights turd. Your innacuracy and general buffoonery is always amusing.TurdBuffer said:
The Trial Court, in other words. BFD.LowIQCirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.
With the 9th Circuit C of Apps being the most frequently reversed of all U.S. circuit courts, it's legal malpractice to rely on any decision from a California trial court withstanding the scrutiny of actual judges whom understand the law.
California courts are the laughing stock of modern jurisprudence.
Herein fail not at your peril. -
Dozens of immigrant advocates are outside a federal courthouse in San Francisco in advance of a hearing where the Trump administration will try to persuade an appeals court to block state laws that protect immigrants.CirrhosisDawg said:
California trial court? Jfc, once again, you are an imbecile. The “US” in US district court should have been your first clue that this is not a California court. This was a federal court. I look forward to hearing your keen legal insights turd. Your innacuracy and general buffoonery is always amusing.TurdBuffer said:
The Trial Court, in other words. BFD.LowIQCirrhosisDawg said:
Once again, just like with sanctuary laws, a US district court slapped down trump on the census question finding it unconstitutional. Unlike with sanctuary laws, however, trump plans on appealing so there will be more to come. For the time being, however, there will not be a citizenship question in the census.
With the 9th Circuit C of Apps being the most frequently reversed of all U.S. circuit courts, it's legal malpractice to rely on any decision from a California trial court withstanding the scrutiny of actual judges whom understand the law.
California courts are the laughing stock of modern jurisprudence.
Herein fail not at your peril.
Some are holding signs that read "ICE out of California," referring to the agency that enforces immigration laws. There are more than 50 people.
At issue before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is a 2018 lawsuit by the administration over three California laws that extended protections to people in the country illegally.
A U.S. judge in Sacramento kept two of the laws in place in July but blocked part of a third.
The White House says the laws obstruct federal immigration enforcement efforts.
It's one of several lawsuits between the White House and the Democratic-dominated state.
The Trump administration is asking a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit to entirely block all three laws. The panel will hear arguments but won't rule immediately.
Last I checked, Sacramento and San Francisco were still in California, California is still a state in the U.S., and federal courts were both located within the state and had federal jurisdiction over federal matters within the state, which is located in the 9th Federal (meaning "U.S.") Circuit.
I wouldn't want to detonate your feeble brain with an explanation of Original vs Pendant Jurisdiction, so I won't.
