Democrats sign off on treason
Comments
-
Please to be showing the "most vile and serious crimes of treason" that Pelosi accused Trump of.RaceBannon said:
There actually are two ways to take my headline for the articleWestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
The treason of the coup or the treason Trump committed, allegedly, since they don't want to do anything about it, allegedly
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
A summer of accusing the Judge of the most vile personal conduct then never mind
Its all show for the base which is as dumb as hondo
Nice party -
Shut the fuck up moron2001400ex said:
Please to be showing the "most vile and serious crimes of treason" that Pelosi accused Trump of.RaceBannon said:
There actually are two ways to take my headline for the articleWestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
The treason of the coup or the treason Trump committed, allegedly, since they don't want to do anything about it, allegedly
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
A summer of accusing the Judge of the most vile personal conduct then never mind
Its all show for the base which is as dumb as hondo
Nice party -
Wait, you said this:RaceBannon said:
Shut the fuck up moron2001400ex said:
Please to be showing the "most vile and serious crimes of treason" that Pelosi accused Trump of.RaceBannon said:
There actually are two ways to take my headline for the articleWestlinnDuck said:Hondo supports the illegitimate attempt to take out Trump. Which supports the article. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
The treason of the coup or the treason Trump committed, allegedly, since they don't want to do anything about it, allegedly
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
A summer of accusing the Judge of the most vile personal conduct then never mind
Its all show for the base which is as dumb as hondo
Nice party
The article itself speaks for itself
2 years of accusing Trump of the most vile and serious crimes of treason,then never mind.
So what were the crimes she accused Trump of Race? Or did you mean something else? Please to be explaining. -
Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion.
-
If you can't see that was photoshopped, then i can't help youRaceBannon said:Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion. -
It is a fact that they met with a Russian agent to discuss the election. She didn't say that was a crime, just stating a fact that's been shown to be true.RaceBannon said:Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion. -
I discussed the election. Was I trying to influence the election? How did their discussion influence the election?2001400ex said:
It is a fact that they met with a Russian agent to discuss the election. She didn't say that was a crime, just stating a fact that's been shown to be true.RaceBannon said:Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion. -
So Russian collusion to steal the election isn't a crime2001400ex said:
It is a fact that they met with a Russian agent to discuss the election. She didn't say that was a crime, just stating a fact that's been shown to be true.RaceBannon said:Just back in January, speaking about the Roger Stone case, Pelosi said “It’s also bothersome his [Stone’s] and the president’s suggestion that’s that we should question whether we should be in NATO, which is a dream come true for Vladimir Putin.” Back in July of 2017, Pelosi promised there is “cold, hard evidence” of collusion between Russia and the Trump family.
Less than a month ago, Schiff was even more bullish on the collusion question. He told CNN, “You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence.”
One thing is clear to any fair observer: if Pelosi and Schiff really believed their outlandish rhetoric on Russian collusion, they would be moving to impeach the president. If they believed, as they previously claimed, that there is clear evidence to show Trump is in bed with Putin, they could not move fast enough to present that evidence and force Republicans to defend an obviously compromised commander in chief. The fact is, they don’t have the evidence, and they don’t expect Special Counsel Robert Mueller to provide it.
Pelosi just pulled the rug out from under House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler much like he and Representative Adam Schiff were rolling out their plans to keep the Russia hoax alive for another two years. With impeachment off the table, all of the document requests look much less like constitutionally mandated oversight and more like what Nadler himself admitted it was after the 2018 midterms, which is a scheme to keep the president under investigation until the 2020 election.
But it is not just Nadler who knows that Pelosi just threw him under the bus. The whole left wing of the Democratic Party, led by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida “impeach the motherf—r” Tlaib, is up in arms over the announcement of Pelosi. Who can blame them? They walked way out on a ledge, staking their credibility on a hare brained impeachment plan based on a lie, and Pelosi just hung them out to dry.
Democrats have based their entire political strategy around convincing their core voters across the nation that it is “Mueller time” and that the special counsel is going to magically produce a smoking gun that will take down Trump once and for all. Even Pelosi herself has publicly bought into this fantasy, pushing conspiracy theories about Vladimir Putin controlling American foreign policy and teasing “cold hard evidence” of collusion.
Why have we had Mueller for two years?
Why do you insist on doubling down on being a fucking moron?
I googled it and found these at the top. If you're contention is that Pelosi never said Trump was guilty then you're a fucking liar as usual -
All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
-
The last honest liberal (not really)HHusky said:All Pelosi said is that she wouldn't call for impeachment . . . yet.
I don't believe her either
Some kind of polling is telling the democrats now that it isn't working and the Mueller report may in fact be a thud and a dud so it is wise to pretend she didn't spend two years saying he was guilty
A lot of posters here need to do the same
