Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The U.S. Now Has More Millionaires Than Sweden Has People
Comments
-
When they say the "bank" do they include 401Ks?Swaye said:10.2 million families have between 1-5 million bucks in the bank. That's more than I expected.
-
MariotaTheGawd said:
The smart posters here. Just ask them2001400ex said: -
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.allpurpleallgold said:When does it start trickling down?
-
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly over the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.SFGbob said:
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.allpurpleallgold said:When does it start trickling down?
-
What is the cause and effect of linking the two?2001400ex said:
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.SFGbob said:
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.allpurpleallgold said:When does it start trickling down?
-
What qualifies as "wealthy" and what qualifies as "middle class?" Where is that line drawn? Btw, how am I hurt by rich people making more money?2001400ex said:
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.SFGbob said:
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.allpurpleallgold said:When does it start trickling down?
-
Bob says trickle down works, see unemployment. If trickle down works, then incomes should be rising at the same rate for the middle class as the wealthy.RaceBannon said:
What is the cause and effect of linking the two?2001400ex said:
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.SFGbob said:
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.allpurpleallgold said:When does it start trickling down?
-
We in the media have a problem. Actually, it's a big problem for all of us. We have become addicted to the notion that, except for the top 1% or the top 10%, the incomes of most Americans have stagnated for decades. The problem is that, at best, this is an exaggeration and, at worst, an untruth.
https://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/income-stagnation-myth-robert-samuelson/ -
Why?2001400ex said:
Bob says trickle down works, see unemployment. If trickle down works, then incomes should be rising at the same rate for the middle class as the wealthy.RaceBannon said:
What is the cause and effect of linking the two?2001400ex said:
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.SFGbob said:
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.allpurpleallgold said:When does it start trickling down?
-
Kunt logic, is there anything it can't do?2001400ex said:
Bob says trickle down works, see unemployment. If trickle down works, then incomes should be rising at the same rate for the middle class as the wealthy.RaceBannon said:
What is the cause and effect of linking the two?2001400ex said:
In relation to tickle down, what do you think about the fact that incomes for the wealthy have grown significantly one the last 20 years yet incomes for the middle class have remained stagnant.SFGbob said:
It already has. Have you seen the unemployment rate? That's part of the trickle down.allpurpleallgold said:When does it start trickling down?
