Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Obama caught lying about Global Warming...

13

Comments

  • death2ducks
    death2ducks Member Posts: 991
    CollegeDoog said:

    Eh. We have some conservative professors, especially in the poli Sci and economics departments.

    Look up Murray Dry. I've taken a couple classes from him.

    Environmental science and other applied sciences are dominated by liberals.

    The thing you don't seem to realize is no one is a product of their professors. Smart people can see past perceived biases. Apparently you can't.

    image

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    CollegeDoog said:

    Eh. We have some conservative professors, especially in the poli Sci and economics departments.

    Look up Murray Dry. I've taken a couple classes from him.

    Environmental science and other applied sciences are dominated by liberals.

    The thing you don't seem to realize is no one is a product of their professors. Smart people can see past perceived biases. Apparently you can't.

    I guess that explains why you can't see past perceived biases.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    Eh. We have some conservative professors, especially in the poli Sci and economics departments.

    Look up Murray Dry. I've taken a couple classes from him.

    Environmental science and other applied sciences are dominated by liberals.

    The thing you don't seem to realize is no one is a product of their professors. Smart people can see past perceived biases. Apparently you can't.

    I guess that explains why you can't see past perceived biases.
    I judge you based on your views.

    Hth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    In 100 years there will be an outpost on Mars, interstellar travel will be a reality, and global warming probably will not be an issue at all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited January 2014
    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    You're the one that brought up gouging as an issue as a way to deflect the issue, not me. I was just asking if Exxon is entitled to an ROA that is in line with and in fact smaller than many other companies.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
    Either way, a lot of people will die.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    CollegeDoog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CollegeDoog said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Costly. Yes,those who are looking to profit on the backs of the poor and middle class are seeing their path to riches not coming together like they have hoped.

    You mean the oil companies who gouge us at the pump? Yes.
    You misspelled taxes collected at the pump
    Both are evils.
    How much of an ROA should a company be allowed to have? Enlighten us.

    You do realize that Microsoft has a much high ROA than Exxon, right? So it's OK for Microsoft to make a huge profit, but Exxon's return is gouging?
    I don't have the answer to that.

    The problem goes beyond profits and who makes money though.
    So they aren't gouging? Goal posts moved once again.
    No the fucking issue is more important than profits. The entire human race could get fucked over within 100 years.
    Or the human race could adapt and move forward as it always does.

    Either way it will be interesting.
    Either way, a lot of people will die.
    Including you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter