Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Deep State Update
RaceBannon
Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,156 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
Posted about this earlier. Denied access. Emailed Stalin, no response, no thread.
Yes, McCabe admitted to planning a coup against a newly elected, sitting President. So? What’s your point? -
Nothing to see here
-
McCabe had reasons, ok?
-
Hondo will be here in a minute saying he can see Russia from Spokane.
-
Why do you hate the constitution and the 25th amendment? We should all feel reassured that someone is paying attention. I know I do.
As an alternative, let’s shut the entire federal government shitshow down for good? Go back to the constitution as it is written? A healthy compromise and win-win for everyone. -
You’re losing so you just want to throw a fit, take your ball and Leave?
-
Doogie hates the constitution. You’ve said so many times now. How does this make america great again?sarktastic said:You’re losing so you just want to throw a fit, take your ball and Leave?
-
Your smawrt
-
Yeah expect for that part of the Constitution that gives the Federal government complete power over setting immigration policy. Mr. Nullification wants to ignore that part of the Constitution.CirrhosisDawg said:Why do you hate the constitution and the 25th amendment? We should all feel reassured that someone is paying attention. I know I do.
As an alternative, let’s shut the entire federal government shitshow down for good? Go back to the constitution as it is written? A healthy compromise and win-win for everyone. -
Fat boy can enforce, and pay for, whatever fat boy wants on behalf of the federal government. California won’t pay one penny or offer any resources, however. It’s in the constitution. You should check it out.SFGbob said:
Yeah expect for that part of the Constitution that gives the Federal government complete power over setting immigration policy. Mr. Nullification wants to ignore that part of the Constitution.CirrhosisDawg said:Why do you hate the constitution and the 25th amendment? We should all feel reassured that someone is paying attention. I know I do.
As an alternative, let’s shut the entire federal government shitshow down for good? Go back to the constitution as it is written? A healthy compromise and win-win for everyone. -
Don't cite the Constitution to me Mr. Nullification. You're making the exact same argument made by Bull Conner and George Wallace.
-
trying your hand at writing fiction stories, now?CirrhosisDawg said:
Fat boy can enforce, and pay for, whatever fat boy wants on behalf of the federal government. California won’t pay one penny or offer any resources, however. It’s in the constitution. You should check it out.SFGbob said:
Yeah expect for that part of the Constitution that gives the Federal government complete power over setting immigration policy. Mr. Nullification wants to ignore that part of the Constitution.CirrhosisDawg said:Why do you hate the constitution and the 25th amendment? We should all feel reassured that someone is paying attention. I know I do.
As an alternative, let’s shut the entire federal government shitshow down for good? Go back to the constitution as it is written? A healthy compromise and win-win for everyone. -
Then overturning California’s sanctuary policies in the courts should be easy, right GayBob? We all know trump is an obese pussy, but this should be easy even for him. Why is trump failing so bad?SFGbob said:Don't cite the Constitution to me Mr. Nullification. You're making the exact same argument made by Bull Conner and George Wallace.
-
Jim Crow laws were on the books for years, using your Kunt logic that must mean they were Constitutional.CirrhosisDawg said:
Then overturning California’s sanctuary policies in the courts should be easy, right GayBob? We all know trump is an obese pussy, but this should be easy even for him. Why is trump failing so bad?SFGbob said:Don't cite the Constitution to me Mr. Nullification. You're making the exact same argument made by Bull Conner and George Wallace.
-
You’ve done all you can to stall and delay but Trump and McConnell have a work around.
Courts will soon be working again. -
Jim Crow was also challenged in the courts in a decades long legal battle. No one is challenging California’s sanctuary laws, including trump. Sanctuary laws are legally validated and binding. There’s nothing you can do about it. Trump isn’t doing anything. Sucker.SFGbob said:
Jim Crow laws were on the books for years, using your Kunt logic that must mean they were Constitutional.CirrhosisDawg said:
Then overturning California’s sanctuary policies in the courts should be easy, right GayBob? We all know trump is an obese pussy, but this should be easy even for him. Why is trump failing so bad?SFGbob said:Don't cite the Constitution to me Mr. Nullification. You're making the exact same argument made by Bull Conner and George Wallace.
-
Still hoping illegals burg Cdawgs mom's pad trash his basement and steal mom's wagon and impregnate his poodle.CirrhosisDawg said:
Fat boy can enforce, and pay for, whatever fat boy wants on behalf of the federal government. California won’t pay one penny or offer any resources, however. It’s in the constitution. You should check it out.SFGbob said:
Yeah expect for that part of the Constitution that gives the Federal government complete power over setting immigration policy. Mr. Nullification wants to ignore that part of the Constitution.CirrhosisDawg said:Why do you hate the constitution and the 25th amendment? We should all feel reassured that someone is paying attention. I know I do.
As an alternative, let’s shut the entire federal government shitshow down for good? Go back to the constitution as it is written? A healthy compromise and win-win for everyone. -
By Maggie AstorCirrhosisDawg said:
Jim Crow was also challenged in the courts in a decades long legal battle. No one is challenging California’s sanctuary laws, including trump. Sanctuary laws are legally validated and binding. There’s nothing you can do about it. Trump isn’t doing anything. Sucker.SFGbob said:
Jim Crow laws were on the books for years, using your Kunt logic that must mean they were Constitutional.CirrhosisDawg said:
Then overturning California’s sanctuary policies in the courts should be easy, right GayBob? We all know trump is an obese pussy, but this should be easy even for him. Why is trump failing so bad?SFGbob said:Don't cite the Constitution to me Mr. Nullification. You're making the exact same argument made by Bull Conner and George Wallace.
March 13, 2018
A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that Texas’ ban on so-called sanctuary cities can take effect while legal challenges proceed, concluding that opponents of the measure were not likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
In a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit almost completely reversed an August ruling by a federal judge in San Antonio, who had temporarily blocked Texas officials from enforcing the ban.
Keep running that ignorant mouth of yours CD. -
Jim Crow laws were held up by the courts for awhile too. The legal challenge to Sanctuary city laws isn't over.
You know about as much on this topic as you did with your claim about banks foreclosing on people who are current on their mortgages. -
Jfc GayBob. This is spectacularly retarded, even for you. The state of Texas bans its cities from adopting sanctuary laws. The federal courts support the ban given texas’ sovereign state status.SFGbob said:
By Maggie AstorCirrhosisDawg said:
Jim Crow was also challenged in the courts in a decades long legal battle. No one is challenging California’s sanctuary laws, including trump. Sanctuary laws are legally validated and binding. There’s nothing you can do about it. Trump isn’t doing anything. Sucker.SFGbob said:
Jim Crow laws were on the books for years, using your Kunt logic that must mean they were Constitutional.CirrhosisDawg said:
Then overturning California’s sanctuary policies in the courts should be easy, right GayBob? We all know trump is an obese pussy, but this should be easy even for him. Why is trump failing so bad?SFGbob said:Don't cite the Constitution to me Mr. Nullification. You're making the exact same argument made by Bull Conner and George Wallace.
March 13, 2018
A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that Texas’ ban on so-called sanctuary cities can take effect while legal challenges proceed, concluding that opponents of the measure were not likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
In a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit almost completely reversed an August ruling by a federal judge in San Antonio, who had temporarily blocked Texas officials from enforcing the ban.
Keep running that ignorant mouth of yours CD.
California is a sanctuary state itself. No one is challenging its right to do so and the federal district court upheld that right under the same principle as in Texas.
How fucking stupid are you?
-
If the Feds can't enforce Federal law in a state then States can make their own voting rights laws and ban people from Pasadena from voting. And I for one, think we should
-
By the way this thread is about the FBI and the DOJ committing treason
Don't let George Wallace get you off track -
What federal law cannot be enforced in California? Trump is really fucking weak if he can’t.RaceBannon said:If the Feds can't enforce Federal law in a state then States can make their own voting rights laws and ban people from Pasadena from voting. And I for one, think we should
Your proposal violates the voting rights act. California sanctuary laws do not violate any provision of the constitution or federal law. Trump is free to argue otherwise but from some reason won’t. Why is that? -
If you're just going to contradict yourself we're done hereCirrhosisDawg said:
What federal law cannot be enforced in California? Trump is really fucking weak if he can’t.RaceBannon said:If the Feds can't enforce Federal law in a state then States can make their own voting rights laws and ban people from Pasadena from voting. And I for one, think we should
Your proposal violates the voting rights act. California sanctuary laws do not violate any provision of the constitution or federal law. Trump is free to argue otherwise but from some reason won’t. Why is that?
Equal treatment under the law is a foundation of the constitution. Immigration policy is a federal matter. If I'm not mistaken and I rarely am, this is in the courts as we speak, Governor Wallace. None of this has anything to do with the attempted coup by the way. We're not fooled
-
Trump has purposely elected not to challenge California law. He knows he is highly likely to lose because this is nothing like Jim Crow. At all.RaceBannon said:
If you're just going to contradict yourself we're done hereCirrhosisDawg said:
What federal law cannot be enforced in California? Trump is really fucking weak if he can’t.RaceBannon said:If the Feds can't enforce Federal law in a state then States can make their own voting rights laws and ban people from Pasadena from voting. And I for one, think we should
Your proposal violates the voting rights act. California sanctuary laws do not violate any provision of the constitution or federal law. Trump is free to argue otherwise but from some reason won’t. Why is that?
Equal treatment under the law is a foundation of the constitution. Immigration policy is a federal matter. If I'm not mistaken and I rarely am, this is in the courts as we speak, Governor Wallace. None of this has anything to do with the attempted coup by the way. We're not fooled -
SFGbob said:
By Maggie AstorCirrhosisDawg said:
Jim Crow was also challenged in the courts in a decades long legal battle. No one is challenging California’s sanctuary laws, including trump. Sanctuary laws are legally validated and binding. There’s nothing you can do about it. Trump isn’t doing anything. Sucker.SFGbob said:
Jim Crow laws were on the books for years, using your Kunt logic that must mean they were Constitutional.CirrhosisDawg said:
Then overturning California’s sanctuary policies in the courts should be easy, right GayBob? We all know trump is an obese pussy, but this should be easy even for him. Why is trump failing so bad?SFGbob said:Don't cite the Constitution to me Mr. Nullification. You're making the exact same argument made by Bull Conner and George Wallace.
March 13, 2018
A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that Texas’ ban on so-called sanctuary cities can take effect while legal challenges proceed, concluding that opponents of the measure were not likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
In a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit almost completely reversed an August ruling by a federal judge in San Antonio, who had temporarily blocked Texas officials from enforcing the ban.
Keep running that ignorant mouth of yours CD. -
Its exactly like Jim Crow because its the same argument. You just like the outcomeCirrhosisDawg said:
Trump has purposely elected not to challenge California law. He knows he is highly likely to lose because this is nothing like Jim Crow. At all.RaceBannon said:
If you're just going to contradict yourself we're done hereCirrhosisDawg said:
What federal law cannot be enforced in California? Trump is really fucking weak if he can’t.RaceBannon said:If the Feds can't enforce Federal law in a state then States can make their own voting rights laws and ban people from Pasadena from voting. And I for one, think we should
Your proposal violates the voting rights act. California sanctuary laws do not violate any provision of the constitution or federal law. Trump is free to argue otherwise but from some reason won’t. Why is that?
Equal treatment under the law is a foundation of the constitution. Immigration policy is a federal matter. If I'm not mistaken and I rarely am, this is in the courts as we speak, Governor Wallace. None of this has anything to do with the attempted coup by the way. We're not fooled
I was there. -
Texas law bans sanctuary cities.RaceBannon said:SFGbob said:
By Maggie AstorCirrhosisDawg said:
Jim Crow was also challenged in the courts in a decades long legal battle. No one is challenging California’s sanctuary laws, including trump. Sanctuary laws are legally validated and binding. There’s nothing you can do about it. Trump isn’t doing anything. Sucker.SFGbob said:
Jim Crow laws were on the books for years, using your Kunt logic that must mean they were Constitutional.CirrhosisDawg said:
Then overturning California’s sanctuary policies in the courts should be easy, right GayBob? We all know trump is an obese pussy, but this should be easy even for him. Why is trump failing so bad?SFGbob said:Don't cite the Constitution to me Mr. Nullification. You're making the exact same argument made by Bull Conner and George Wallace.
March 13, 2018
A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that Texas’ ban on so-called sanctuary cities can take effect while legal challenges proceed, concluding that opponents of the measure were not likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
In a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit almost completely reversed an August ruling by a federal judge in San Antonio, who had temporarily blocked Texas officials from enforcing the ban.
Keep running that ignorant mouth of yours CD.
California expressly prohibits public resources being expended to enforce federal law.
Federal courts uphold both policies under federalism. -
Law enforcement agencies are being forced to not report illegals with federal crime warrants. They are being forced not to make a simple phone call. That you think this is good shows how far off the deep end you are. Letting felons, often violent felons loose on the streets is a danger to the public. The police/sheriff exist to protect the public. this doesn't cost a dime it's just a #Resist Trump bullshit.CirrhosisDawg said:
What federal law cannot be enforced in California? Trump is really fucking weak if he can’t.RaceBannon said:If the Feds can't enforce Federal law in a state then States can make their own voting rights laws and ban people from Pasadena from voting. And I for one, think we should
Your proposal violates the voting rights act. California sanctuary laws do not violate any provision of the constitution or federal law. Trump is free to argue otherwise but from some reason won’t. Why is that?
You and anyone who believes this is right are fucking morons and deserve to be victimized by those set free to commit crimes on innocent Californians.
Now Fuck off! -
You should sue.Sledog said:
Law enforcement agencies are being forced to not report illegals with federal crime warrants. They are being forced not to make a simple phone call. That you think this is good shows how far off the deep end you are. Letting felons, often violent felons loose on the streets is a danger to the public. The police/sheriff exist to protect the public. this doesn't cost a dime it's just a #Resist Trump bullshit.CirrhosisDawg said:
What federal law cannot be enforced in California? Trump is really fucking weak if he can’t.RaceBannon said:If the Feds can't enforce Federal law in a state then States can make their own voting rights laws and ban people from Pasadena from voting. And I for one, think we should
Your proposal violates the voting rights act. California sanctuary laws do not violate any provision of the constitution or federal law. Trump is free to argue otherwise but from some reason won’t. Why is that?
You and anyone who believes this is right are fucking morons and deserve to be victimized by those set free to commit crimes on innocent Californians.
Now Fuck off!
