Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hondo and his merry comrades will be upset

2»

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    They weren't getting anything past Obama but still. And they never had 60 Senators like the dems did when they inflicted Obamcare on us

    But they should have made a plan and had the democrats vote it down. They would have kept the house and maybe got to 60

    We've been over this. 60 votes doesn't mean shit anymore. Nuclear option there?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,113 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    They weren't getting anything past Obama but still. And they never had 60 Senators like the dems did when they inflicted Obamcare on us

    But they should have made a plan and had the democrats vote it down. They would have kept the house and maybe got to 60

    We've been over this. 60 votes doesn't mean shit anymore. Nuclear option there?
    No matter how many times you lie it doesn't mean "we went over this"

    Fuck off. You need 60
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    They weren't getting anything past Obama but still. And they never had 60 Senators like the dems did when they inflicted Obamcare on us

    But they should have made a plan and had the democrats vote it down. They would have kept the house and maybe got to 60

    We've been over this. 60 votes doesn't mean shit anymore. Nuclear option there?
    No matter how many times you lie it doesn't mean "we went over this"

    Fuck off. You need 60
    Liar.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,477 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    They weren't getting anything past Obama but still. And they never had 60 Senators like the dems did when they inflicted Obamcare on us

    But they should have made a plan and had the democrats vote it down. They would have kept the house and maybe got to 60

    We've been over this. 60 votes doesn't mean shit anymore. Nuclear option there?
    No matter how many times you lie it doesn't mean "we went over this"

    Fuck off. You need 60
    Liar.
    Projecting. Again.

    No matter how hard you try, you aren't going to rewrite history. #aclockworkshill


    Fuck right off.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,113 Founders Club
    As Kavenaugh was being voted in I wonder if Harry Reid had any regrets about changing the rules for judges? Hondofs has no idea what I am referencing. He just has talking points

    McConnell isn't that stupid. The democrats will be back in the majority someday
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    As Kavenaugh was being voted in I wonder if Harry Reid had any regrets about changing the rules for judges? Hondofs has no idea what I am referencing. He just has talking points

    McConnell isn't that stupid. The democrats will be back in the majority someday

    It was fucktarded when Democrats did it. It was fucktarded when Republicans did it.

    And Republicans can still put a plan together with less than 60 votes and put the onus on Democrats. But they didn't.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,477 Founders Club
    edited February 2019
    2001400ex said:

    As Kavenaugh was being voted in I wonder if Harry Reid had any regrets about changing the rules for judges? Hondofs has no idea what I am referencing. He just has talking points

    McConnell isn't that stupid. The democrats will be back in the majority someday

    It was fucktarded when Democrats did it. It was fucktarded when Republicans did it.

    And Republicans can still put a plan together with less than 60 votes and put the onus on Democrats. But they didn't.
    This is how we? know you're the dumbest motherfucker alive.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,113 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    As Kavenaugh was being voted in I wonder if Harry Reid had any regrets about changing the rules for judges? Hondofs has no idea what I am referencing. He just has talking points

    McConnell isn't that stupid. The democrats will be back in the majority someday

    It was fucktarded when Democrats did it. It was fucktarded when Republicans did it.

    And Republicans can still put a plan together with less than 60 votes and put the onus on Democrats. But they didn't.
    Did what? The Republicans didn't change the 60 vote requirement. They just took advantage of Reid being a moron

    I already wrote that the GOP could have made the democrats vote no. Dumb as a fucking rock

    They weren't getting anything past Obama but still. And they never had 60 Senators like the dems did when they inflicted Obamcare on us

    But they should have made a plan and had the democrats vote it down. They would have kept the house and maybe got to 60

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.

    So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?
    The old emergency room ruse. That was one of the big savings that Obamacare was supposed to address. It didn’t, but next time it definitely will. HondoFS

    Muh common sense!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/26625571
    Obamacare didn't accomplish a lot of the goals they thought it would.

    I would love to see how the Republican health Care plan would work.
    Yeah but Hondo feels that Medicare for all will accomplish all its goals. Like a small child who believes in the tooth fairy.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited February 2019
    2001400ex said:

    They weren't getting anything past Obama but still. And they never had 60 Senators like the dems did when they inflicted Obamcare on us

    But they should have made a plan and had the democrats vote it down. They would have kept the house and maybe got to 60

    We've been over this. 60 votes doesn't mean shit anymore. Nuclear option there?
    Yeah, we went over it and you lied your ass off. The need for 60 votes still applies to legislation.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    As Kavenaugh was being voted in I wonder if Harry Reid had any regrets about changing the rules for judges? Hondofs has no idea what I am referencing. He just has talking points

    McConnell isn't that stupid. The democrats will be back in the majority someday

    It was fucktarded when Democrats did it. It was fucktarded when Republicans did it.

    And Republicans can still put a plan together with less than 60 votes and put the onus on Democrats. But they didn't.
    This is how we? know you're the dumbest motherfucker alive.
    He marries stupidity with shameless dishonesty.

    Notice as well that Mr. "Context" never cites the context that explains the need for 60 votes when trying to pass legislation.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.

    So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?
    The old emergency room ruse. That was one of the big savings that Obamacare was supposed to address. It didn’t, but next time it definitely will. HondoFS

    Muh common sense!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/26625571
    Obamacare didn't accomplish a lot of the goals they thought it would.

    I would love to see how the Republican health Care plan would work.
    So it didn't work and everyone paid a lot more just like we said it would. Imagine that....
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.

    So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?
    The old emergency room ruse. That was one of the big savings that Obamacare was supposed to address. It didn’t, but next time it definitely will. HondoFS

    Muh common sense!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/26625571
    Obamacare didn't accomplish a lot of the goals they thought it would.

    I would love to see how the Republican health Care plan would work.
    So it didn't work and everyone paid a lot more just like we said it would. Imagine that....
    But trust him. Medicare for all is going to be great.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.

    So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?
    The old emergency room ruse. That was one of the big savings that Obamacare was supposed to address. It didn’t, but next time it definitely will. HondoFS

    Muh common sense!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/26625571
    Obamacare didn't accomplish a lot of the goals they thought it would.

    I would love to see how the Republican health Care plan would work.
    But Medicare for all will save money!! It’s common sense!

    Would be need to pass Medicare for all to see what’s in the bill?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    Yes. Emergency rooms are for emergencies. Not colds. Of course that really started when they passed laws that they were required to treat anyone for anything.

    So you agree it'll save money. Da fuq is your problem?
    The old emergency room ruse. That was one of the big savings that Obamacare was supposed to address. It didn’t, but next time it definitely will. HondoFS

    Muh common sense!

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/26625571
    Obamacare didn't accomplish a lot of the goals they thought it would.

    I would love to see how the Republican health Care plan would work.
    But Medicare for all will save money!! It’s common sense!

    Would be need to pass Medicare for all to see what’s in the bill?
    That's because they all shamelessly leave out the "context" that they count every dollar that's currently spent privately on healthcare as part of the existing public dollars that are spent on healthcare.

    With a Medicare for all system taxes will have to be raised in order to get the money that's currently being spent privately.