Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Seriously?
Comments
-
Straw man ass fucker!SFGbob said:They weren't denying them access to public schools. They were denying them access to a white public school. You Rats have always been about standing in the school house doorways.
You're parroting the exact same arguments the old Southern Rat racists used when the Feds tried to enforce Federal law.
Hardly shocking, you come off like a bigoted dumbfuck in most of your posts here. Good to see you drop the mask.
No one is stopping fat boy from enforcing federal law. That’s why he lost his legal challenge. Why won’t he appeal to scotus GayBob? Southern schools lost the legal argument every time, just like you and trump.
Not surprised a “a man of truth and integrity” like you has to hide behind civil rights era black kids to defend your ignorance. -
You’re making Bull Conner proud
-
-
You should be on really solid legal standing then, right?RaceBannon said:He's onto to you like I am @CirrhosisDawg
Tell us again how sanctuary laws are illegal, and unconstitutional? You’ve lost every step of the way so far but I’m sure you have a good argument. It’s like Orval Faubus all over again! Except you can’t win the argument in policy or law. -
You had one District Court judge rule against the Administration. Every step of the way!!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
You should be on really solid legal standing then, right?RaceBannon said:He's onto to you like I am @CirrhosisDawg
Tell us again how sanctuary laws are illegal, and unconstitutional? You’ve lost every step of the way so far but I’m sure you have a good argument. It’s like Orval Faubus all over again! Except you can’t win the argument in policy or law.
What a dumbfuck -
You’ll win next time! Except there isn’t going to be a next time. Why won’t fat boy appeal? The district order stands. It’s like bull Connor? Is that your argument? You should win easily then right?SFGbob said:
You had one District Court judge rule against the Administration. Every step of the way!!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
You should be on really solid legal standing then, right?RaceBannon said:He's onto to you like I am @CirrhosisDawg
Tell us again how sanctuary laws are illegal, and unconstitutional? You’ve lost every step of the way so far but I’m sure you have a good argument. It’s like Orval Faubus all over again! Except you can’t win the argument in policy or law.
What a dumbfuck -
If we're actually trying to get to the point, maybe it ought to include a discussion of why a Christian clergyman is a state employee.SFGbob said:
No because he wasn't a state employee. Do you think lying helps your case O'Keefed?HHusky said:Fact: he couldn’t have his clergyman in the room because he was not a Christian.
No, it's not a constitutional crisis. But it's a fair question/point to raise.
What the guy did, and false allegations of people supporting him on anything other than the one raised, appears to be someone fucking straw man ass. -
"Illegal immigration now, Illegal immigration tomorrow, Illegal immigration forever!!!!"CirrhosisDawg said:
You’ll win next time! Except there isn’t going to be a next time. Why won’t fat boy appeal? The district order stands. It’s like bull Connor? Is that your argument? You should win easily then right?SFGbob said:
You had one District Court judge rule against the Administration. Every step of the way!!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
You should be on really solid legal standing then, right?RaceBannon said:He's onto to you like I am @CirrhosisDawg
Tell us again how sanctuary laws are illegal, and unconstitutional? You’ve lost every step of the way so far but I’m sure you have a good argument. It’s like Orval Faubus all over again! Except you can’t win the argument in policy or law.
What a dumbfuck
George Wallace lives, and he is still a Rat. -
O'Keefed has a long, history of squirting tears over child killers who are facing the death penalty. And for all I know the clergyman could have been a prison guard who was also a pastor.creepycoug said:
If we're actually trying to get to the point, maybe it ought to include a discussion of why a Christian clergyman is a state employee.SFGbob said:
No because he wasn't a state employee. Do you think lying helps your case O'Keefed?HHusky said:Fact: he couldn’t have his clergyman in the room because he was not a Christian.
No, it's not a constitutional crisis. But it's a fair question/point to raise.
What the guy did, and false allegations of people supporting him on anything other than the one raised, appears to be someone fucking straw man ass. -
Take your grievances to trump.SFGbob said:
"Illegal immigration now, Illegal immigration tomorrow, Illegal immigration forever!!!!"CirrhosisDawg said:
You’ll win next time! Except there isn’t going to be a next time. Why won’t fat boy appeal? The district order stands. It’s like bull Connor? Is that your argument? You should win easily then right?SFGbob said:
You had one District Court judge rule against the Administration. Every step of the way!!!!CirrhosisDawg said:
You should be on really solid legal standing then, right?RaceBannon said:He's onto to you like I am @CirrhosisDawg
Tell us again how sanctuary laws are illegal, and unconstitutional? You’ve lost every step of the way so far but I’m sure you have a good argument. It’s like Orval Faubus all over again! Except you can’t win the argument in policy or law.
What a dumbfuck
George Wallace lives, and he is still a Rat.
California doesn’t enforce or pay for federal immigration law. It’s not our responsibility. Fat boy is always free to take legal action. He won’t, because just like you, he’s a giant fucking pussy and will lose.
