LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSC
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSC I thought you said notable?
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSCOhio St
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSC I thought you said notable? you seem butthurt
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSC I thought you said notable? I did. Their 2009- 14 run is still vastly superior to our 2016- 18 run. Oregon is relevant until they aren’t.
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSCOhio St But all the blue bloods stole UWs lunch money!
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSCOhio St But all the blue bloods stole UWs lunch money! This narrative is so FS. Yeah, we sucked at WR this year at TE will continue to suck on perpetuity. The trend is clear...4,5,7,9,10,14I'm not good at Maff but seems like we are getting more and more BC's each year. And that's with 3 bowl losses in a row.
It’s important to note that under Petersen we will likely always have smaller classes. That has its pros and cons, but realistically it puts at a pretty big competitive disadvantage when many of the top 10 classes will sign 23-27 players each year and we’ll be closer to 20-22. Signing 3-4 more players just gives you that much better odds of players panning out while at the same time churning over the bottom of your roster suddenly senioring guys or suggesting transfers. Not everybody does it, but lots of the big boys do. Thought it was worth bringing up cause every year someone brings up “if we signed up as many players and so and so are classes would be ranked the same.”
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSC I thought you said notable? you seem butthurt Nope, just taking cheap shots at little brother. It's better than being wazzu who isn't even in the conversation. LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSC I thought you said notable? I did. Their 2009- 14 run is still vastly superior to our 2016- 18 run. Oregon is relevant until they aren’t. Sure, but it's not recent at all. Our 80's and 90's run was superior but it still doesn't make us nationally relevant until we are again.
It’s important to note that under Petersen we will likely always have smaller classes. That has its pros and cons, but realistically it puts at a pretty big competitive disadvantage when many of the top 10 classes will sign 23-27 players each year and we’ll be closer to 20-22. Signing 3-4 more players just gives you that much better odds of players panning out while at the same time churning over the bottom of your roster suddenly senioring guys or suggesting transfers. Not everybody does it, but lots of the big boys do. Thought it was worth bringing up cause every year someone brings up “if we signed up as many players and so and so are classes would be ranked the same.” It's the lesser of two evils for Pete. "honor and integrity" versus "whatever it takes" given his (lack of) apparent coffee cup stance, it is what it is. We have to live with it and deal with the ongoing high blood pressure TBS'ing.
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSCOhio St Other than Clemson those teams are notable for being in declineOhio State lost the best recruiter in the game
LSU Oregon ClimpsonAuburn TennFlorida StateUSCOhio St Other than Clemson those teams are notable for being in declineOhio State lost the best recruiter in the game Other than Clemson every program in the country is in decline.