Notable programs that signed equal or fewer (??) blue chips (247 composite) than UW in 2019
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St
Comments
-
I thought you said notable?YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC -
STOP FUCKIGN USING COMPOSITE GODDAMNIT
-
you seem butthurtUW_Doog_Bot said:
I thought you said notable?YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC -
I did. Their 2009- 14 run is still vastly superior to our 2016- 18 run. Oregon is relevant until they aren’t.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I thought you said notable?YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC -
It should be noted that UW had the #1 pac 12 class and #10 class nationally if you use 247 star average. I think it also holds true for composite.
-
But all the blue bloods stole UWs lunch money!YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St -
Nope, just taking cheap shots at little brother. It's better than being wazzu who isn't even in the conversation.greenblood said:
you seem butthurtUW_Doog_Bot said:
I thought you said notable?YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Sure, but it's not recent at all. Our 80's and 90's run was superior but it still doesn't make us nationally relevant until we are again.YellowSnow said:
I did. Their 2009- 14 run is still vastly superior to our 2016- 18 run. Oregon is relevant until they aren’t.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I thought you said notable?YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC -
This narrative is so FS. Yeah, we sucked at WR this year at TE will continue to suck on perpetuity.chuck said:
But all the blue bloods stole UWs lunch money!YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St
The trend is clear...
4,5,7,9,10,14
I'm not good at Maff but seems like we are getting more and more BC's each year. And that's with 3 bowl losses in a row. -
It's perception. We ARE losing more battles over blue chips to blue bloods now than before but that's also because we are in it for more blue chips that blue bloods want now. It happens when you level up from diamonds in the ruff and regional battles against Boise to consensus blue chips and the national recruiting stage.YellowSnow said:
This narrative is so FS. Yeah, we sucked at WR this year at TE will continue to suck on perpetuity.chuck said:
But all the blue bloods stole UWs lunch money!YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St
The trend is clear...
4,5,7,9,10,14
I'm not good at Maff but seems like we are getting more and more BC's each year. And that's with 3 bowl losses in a row. -
I’ll be updating my recruiting trajectory and comparison vs National Champion Clemson once Puka decides.YellowSnow said:
This narrative is so FS. Yeah, we sucked at WR this year at TE will continue to suck on perpetuity.chuck said:
But all the blue bloods stole UWs lunch money!YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St
The trend is clear...
4,5,7,9,10,14
I'm not good at Maff but seems like we are getting more and more BC's each year. And that's with 3 bowl losses in a row.
I’ll also be updating my total team talent trajectory and comparison vs National Champ Clemson once the 2019 Total talent scores are available. -
It’s important to note that under Petersen we will likely always have smaller classes. That has its pros and cons, but realistically it puts at a pretty big competitive disadvantage when many of the top 10 classes will sign 23-27 players each year and we’ll be closer to 20-22.
Signing 3-4 more players just gives you that much better odds of players panning out while at the same time churning over the bottom of your roster suddenly senioring guys or suggesting transfers. Not everybody does it, but lots of the big boys do.
Thought it was worth bringing up cause every year someone brings up “if we signed up as many players and so and so are classes would be ranked the same.” -
Counterpoint is that Pete is bringing in legit walkonsdawgs206 said:It’s important to note that under Petersen we will likely always have smaller classes. That has its pros and cons, but realistically it puts at a pretty big competitive disadvantage when many of the top 10 classes will sign 23-27 players each year and we’ll be closer to 20-22.
Signing 3-4 more players just gives you that much better odds of players panning out while at the same time churning over the bottom of your roster suddenly senioring guys or suggesting transfers. Not everybody does it, but lots of the big boys do.
Thought it was worth bringing up cause every year someone brings up “if we signed up as many players and so and so are classes would be ranked the same.” -
Some are fucking project that time to develop. King was not amazing until his Sr year. Sodawgs206 said:It’s important to note that under Petersen we will likely always have smaller classes. That has its pros and cons, but realistically it puts at a pretty big competitive disadvantage when many of the top 10 classes will sign 23-27 players each year and we’ll be closer to 20-22.
Signing 3-4 more players just gives you that much better odds of players panning out while at the same time churning over the bottom of your roster suddenly senioring guys or suggesting transfers. Not everybody does it, but lots of the big boys do.
Thought it was worth bringing up cause every year someone brings up “if we signed up as many players and so and so are classes would be ranked the same.” -
Quit living in the passed.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Nope, just taking cheap shots at little brother. It's better than being wazzu who isn't even in the conversation.greenblood said:
you seem butthurtUW_Doog_Bot said:
I thought you said notable?YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Sure, but it's not recent at all. Our 80's and 90's run was superior but it still doesn't make us nationally relevant until we are again.YellowSnow said:
I did. Their 2009- 14 run is still vastly superior to our 2016- 18 run. Oregon is relevant until they aren’t.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I thought you said notable?YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC -
It's the lesser of two evils for Pete.dawgs206 said:It’s important to note that under Petersen we will likely always have smaller classes. That has its pros and cons, but realistically it puts at a pretty big competitive disadvantage when many of the top 10 classes will sign 23-27 players each year and we’ll be closer to 20-22.
Signing 3-4 more players just gives you that much better odds of players panning out while at the same time churning over the bottom of your roster suddenly senioring guys or suggesting transfers. Not everybody does it, but lots of the big boys do.
Thought it was worth bringing up cause every year someone brings up “if we signed up as many players and so and so are classes would be ranked the same.”
"honor and integrity" versus "whatever it takes"
given his (lack of) apparent coffee cup stance, it is what it is.
We have to live with it and deal with the ongoing high blood pressure TBS'ing. -
Yea, I agree. Wasn't saying what is right or wrong, more so for the argument of stacking classes we are going to be at a disadvantage.animate said:
It's the lesser of two evils for Pete.dawgs206 said:It’s important to note that under Petersen we will likely always have smaller classes. That has its pros and cons, but realistically it puts at a pretty big competitive disadvantage when many of the top 10 classes will sign 23-27 players each year and we’ll be closer to 20-22.
Signing 3-4 more players just gives you that much better odds of players panning out while at the same time churning over the bottom of your roster suddenly senioring guys or suggesting transfers. Not everybody does it, but lots of the big boys do.
Thought it was worth bringing up cause every year someone brings up “if we signed up as many players and so and so are classes would be ranked the same.”
"honor and integrity" versus "whatever it takes"
given his (lack of) apparent coffee cup stance, it is what it is.
We have to live with it and deal with the ongoing high blood pressure TBS'ing.
Look at the top 7 schools (Sorry Swaye, for ease of use I went composite)
Bama - 27, 22, 29, 25 ---> 103
Georgia - 24, 26, 26, 23 ---> 99
Texas AM - 25, 23, 28, 21 --->97
Oklahoma - 24, 23, 28, 21 ---> 96
Oregon - 26, 24, 25, 21 ---> 96
Michigan - 26, 19, 30, 28 ---> 103
UW - 22, 20, 18, 17 ---> 77
That is 19-26 more players for these teams over a 4 year cycle. That is equivalent to a large recruiting class for UW EVERY 4 YEARS. Recruiting is all a numbers game. The more highly rated players you sign, the higher likelihood that some pan out. We have to hit at a much higher rate and develop much better to have success against the top teams. Yes, I know the rules have changed, but you can still mess with the numbers each class.
Getting walk-ons is a counter point, especially this year, but it doesn't close the gap much (considering how many less players we are signing). Myles Bryant is by far the best walk-on under Petersen and 1/2 the bored hates him (I stand with Myles). -
Your yellow ass looks great in those pants 👀YellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St -
Other than Clemson those teams are notable for being in declineYellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St
Ohio State lost the best recruiter in the game
-
Other than Clemson every program in the country is in decline.RaceBannon said:
Other than Clemson those teams are notable for being in declineYellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St
Ohio State lost the best recruiter in the game -
But stillFremontTroll said:
Other than Clemson every program in the country is in decline.RaceBannon said:
Other than Clemson those teams are notable for being in declineYellowSnow said:LSU
Oregon
Climpson
Auburn
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St
Ohio State lost the best recruiter in the game -
Bump
LSU
Aubrun **fewer
Climpson
Oregon **fewer
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St -
All of them on that list are fewerYellowSnow said:Bump
LSU
Aubrun **fewer
Climpson
Oregon **fewer
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St -
Now there are.HillsboroDuck said:
All of them on that list are fewerYellowSnow said:Bump
LSU
Aubrun **fewer
Climpson
Oregon **fewer
Tenn
Florida State
USC
Ohio St -
I believe we are now #7 in the nation in terms of star average and are tied for #3 in total number of blue chip recruits
Bama - 24
ND - 17
Georgia, Pedo St., UW - 16 -
Suck our fucking giant purple and gold cock!
-
Did you actually count up the 247 blue chips for each class? Via composite this isn't close.bananasnblondes said:I believe we are now #7 in the nation in terms of star average and are tied for #3 in total number of blue chip recruits
Bama - 24
ND - 17
Georgia, Pedo St., UW - 16
Bama - 26
UGA - 20
Pedo - 18
Tejas/Flo Ridah - 17
Jenga/UO/Go Blue/Loy's Boys - 16
UW - 15
I know UW gets another via 247 (Cam). Do all those schools drop from Comp to 247?
-
I just looked at the 247 class ranking list and counted up 4 and 5 stars for each team. I believe it's just 247 rankings (which I put much more stock in). Its the ranking where Oregon is 10 and UW 11HillsboroDuck said:
Did you actually count up the 247 blue chips for each class? Via composite this isn't close.bananasnblondes said:I believe we are now #7 in the nation in terms of star average and are tied for #3 in total number of blue chip recruits
Bama - 24
ND - 17
Georgia, Pedo St., UW - 16
Bama - 26
UGA - 20
Pedo - 18
Tejas/Flo Ridah - 17
Jenga/UO/Go Blue/Loy's Boys - 16
UW - 15
I know UW gets another via 247 (Cam). Do all those schools drop from Comp to 247? -
I haven't been able to find this ranking by team, all I can find is their comp rankings. If someone can help a brother out with a link I'd love to see it.bananasnblondes said:
I just looked at the 247 class ranking list and counted up 4 and 5 stars for each team. I believe it's just 247 rankings (which I put much more stock in). Its the ranking where Oregon is 10 and UW 11HillsboroDuck said:
Did you actually count up the 247 blue chips for each class? Via composite this isn't close.bananasnblondes said:I believe we are now #7 in the nation in terms of star average and are tied for #3 in total number of blue chip recruits
Bama - 24
ND - 17
Georgia, Pedo St., UW - 16
Bama - 26
UGA - 20
Pedo - 18
Tejas/Flo Ridah - 17
Jenga/UO/Go Blue/Loy's Boys - 16
UW - 15
I know UW gets another via 247 (Cam). Do all those schools drop from Comp to 247?
-
What if Eason is actually good?
Fuck -
There's no way he can be worse than Jack Cobra. Browning wold not have started at UGA as true frosh, or beat out Fromm until he got hurt. There's just no way.RaceBannon said:What if Eason is actually good?
Fuck
