Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What's a more basic responsibility than feeding your kids?

MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
edited August 2022 in Tug Tavern
But hey, let's make sure the next generation knows the government provides their most basic needs. Not their parents/family. It will make them easier to control.


«1

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,823 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2022
    https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/aug/09/all-spokane-public-schools-student-will-be-eligibl/

    Spokane Public Schools are providing free lunch to every kid in the district next year.

    Coming soon to WA school district near you.

    They aren't learning jack shit for the taxpayer money. I guess feeding them is a bit of an ROI on our property taxes and levys

    Marcus Ricelli is a special kind of evil. Always the front guy on the save-the-world/decriminalize crime shit.



  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,922 Swaye's Wigwam
    School lunches are a human right.
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    If the kids agree to puberty blockers, they'll even throw in dessert.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,886
    I don’t hate the school lunch thing.
  • JoeyJoey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,883 Founders Club
    They did this at our school district last year. Shit food. I packed them lunches 95% of the time
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,073
    edited August 2022
    Most parents have no idea how to feed their kids which is why millenials (except me) all of Gen Z are chubby cucks. The next gen will either be worse or rebel against being a pathetic loser because kids always choose the opposite of what their parents think is cool.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited August 2022
    Kaepsknee said:

    I don’t hate the school lunch thing.

    I do. Not because I hate kids getting food. I hate the message it sends to kids and parents. They state will take care of your simplest and most basic needs. Parents no longer need to even put in an effort to provide. A dangerous message that has consequences that we see now and will in the future.

    Seriously, how hard is it to get your kids some food before they head out. They don't need a full blown giant country breakfast. Boil some eggs on Sunday night and they can have them all week. Even now eggs can be bought for 25 cents each. Add it some oatmeal and you have something that takes almost no time and costs less than $1.

    And the food they feed the kids is garbage.

    This just allows kids and parents to be lazier and fatter and good training for when the government tells them what to do.

    Arguments in favor usually succumb to the "won't someone think of the children" logical fallacy. An appeal to emotion.

    I remember when being on free/reduced lunch was a stigma that parents wanted to avoid and get out of if they got into that position. It was temporary and transitional for most.
  • TXDawgTXDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 847 Founders Club
    edited August 2022

    They did this at our school district last year. Shit food. I packed them lunches 95% of the time

    Obviously the results of their work won't stop the government from expanding their invasion of our lives.

    "Young Americans are increasingly too overweight or undereducated to join the U.S. military, according to a growing number of both retired and active-duty military leaders."



  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,472 Founders Club
    It used to be based on income. If you were poor, it was free. Lower middle class got reduced prices. I'm pretty sure rich, SJW San Fransicko families who make like $350,000 a year and send their kids to the specialized pub(l)ic schools don't need this.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,823 Standard Supporter

    It used to be based on income. If you were poor, it was free. Lower middle class got reduced prices. I'm pretty sure rich, SJW San Fransicko families who make like $350,000 a year and send their kids to the specialized pub(l)ic schools don't need this.

    It's so the poor kids don't "feel" poor.

    Out of feeling poor comes the next generation of go-getters.

  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,450
    Bellevue School District is not doing free school lunch.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Kaepsknee said:

    I don’t hate the school lunch thing.

    I do. Not because I hate kids getting food. I hate the message it sends to kids and parents. They state will take care of your simplest and most basic needs. Parents no longer need to even put in an effort to provide. A dangerous message that has consequences that we see now and will in the future.

    Seriously, how hard is it to get your kids some food before they head out. They don't need a full blown giant country breakfast. Boil some eggs on Sunday night and they can have them all week. Even now eggs can be bought for 25 cents each. Add it some oatmeal and you have something that takes almost no time and costs less than $1.

    And the food they feed the kids is garbage.

    This just allows kids and parents to be lazier and fatter and good training for when the government tells them what to do.

    Arguments in favor usually succumb to the "won't someone think of the children" logical fallacy. An appeal to emotion.

    I remember when being on free/reduced lunch was a stigma that parents wanted to avoid and get out of if they got into that position. It was temporary and transitional for most.
    Well intentioned or a plan to diminish the importance of parents? They’re already doing it in the classroom. We hear it being said by teachers themselves.

    School lunches are crap. My kids wouldn’t eat them.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,823 Standard Supporter
    thechatch said:

    Bellevue School District is not doing free school lunch.

    Just for the football players they recruit.

    Oh wait...that's free APARTMENTS, not food.

  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,450
    School lunches is just not something I’m going to get worked up about. They need to be healthy and they need to be relatively cheap. There’s a societal benefit in not having a bunch of fat kids because fat kids with shitty eating habits turn into fat adults with shitty eating g habits and it’s a strain in our healthcare apparatus.

    Chicken, rice, and veggies shouldn’t be that hard
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,823 Standard Supporter
    You guys and your 'school lunch is shitty' takes.

    Just once would love to go back and have fishsticks on Friday and mashed potatoes and gravy circa 70s style.

    The pizza was hit and miss.

    But the Throbber fucking loved hot lunch for the most part. The little ice cream cups with half vanilla and have orange. The scoop full of sugary peaches and cherries and pineapples. Goddamned delicious.

  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,538 Founders Club
    At the heart of this is the attempt to eliminate meat from kids' lives and dumb down this generation to make them easier to control as they become adults. There are studies out there conclusively showing when kids (even infants) are fed a carnivore diet, their physical development is faster, their brains develop faster and become bigger, and IQs are higher than compared to kids eating the standard American diet.

    The powers that be know this and are trying to retard America's future by snuffing out the potential of our future generations.
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,450
    -French bread pizza
    - Chicken fried steak/mashed Potatoes
    - Taco salad
    - Hamburger/fries

    Were really the only things I touched in grade school. HS was closed campus but we left and went to the sub shop or whatever anyway.

    My junior year they brought in Taco Bell and I think Quiznos to sell ala cart in an effort to keep kids on campus.

    Anyway, we loved school lunch in grade school, but no one was eating that shit in HS. Some parents don’t have time/means to make their kids lunch every day so school lunch should be reasonably healthy and it should be subsidized. Underserved communities depend on it and I have no interest in trying to make the argument that clipping it from the budget makes any sort of sense.

    I’d rather get rid of the army of administrators that suck blood from the education budget like a school of lampreys or the 30% or so of teachers who are utterly useless and are only in education because they’d be a failure in any other sector than anything else.

    At the end of the day we need to be doing what we can to make it health(ier) and make it available. One of the few things I really supported out of the Obama admin. The execution sucked but the philosophy was sound.
  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,538 Founders Club
    Also of note, where is California going to get the money to pay for this monstrosity?
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,709 Standard Supporter

    thechatch said:

    School lunches is just not something I’m going to get worked up about. They need to be healthy and they need to be relatively cheap. There’s a societal benefit in not having a bunch of fat kids because fat kids with shitty eating habits turn into fat adults with shitty eating g habits and it’s a strain in our healthcare apparatus.

    Chicken, rice, and veggies shouldn’t be that hard

    They aren't healthy. And it's another incremental step in indoctrination.

    "I'm not going to get worked up about limiting how many rounds of ammo I can buy at one time, it's not like they are banning guns..."

    That's how it works. Little steps so people don't get too worked up. Then let the dust settle for a bit, then take the next step.

    "Who cares if gays get married, that doesn't hurt you".

    It's called progressive for a reason. They literally never stop.
    First priority of being a parent is taking care of your kids. In 2022 in America it is easier than anytime in human history. Local car wash is paying $20 an hour for someone to take your money and push a button. A family of four with two working parents at $20 an hour can clear $40k a year income tax free. You won't live like a king, but you can feed your kids on that. What hurts is the massive increase in the price of gasoline, rent, food and utilities. All of which have increased as a result of democrat policies to make life better for working class Americans. Then toss in the labor pressure of importing three plus million legal and illegal immigrants a year. When our media and schools put more social pressure on smoking and mask wearing versus instilling any sense of responsibility for feeding your kids, we are phucked.
Sign In or Register to comment.