Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
What's a more basic responsibility than feeding your kids?
MikeDamone
Member Posts: 37,781
But hey, let's make sure the next generation knows the government provides their most basic needs. Not their parents/family. It will make them easier to control.
Comments
-
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/aug/09/all-spokane-public-schools-student-will-be-eligibl/
Spokane Public Schools are providing free lunch to every kid in the district next year.
Coming soon to WA school district near you.
They aren't learning jack shit for the taxpayer money. I guess feeding them is a bit of an ROI on our property taxes and levys
Marcus Ricelli is a special kind of evil. Always the front guy on the save-the-world/decriminalize crime shit.
-
School lunches are a human right.
-
If the kids agree to puberty blockers, they'll even throw in dessert.
-
I don’t hate the school lunch thing.
-
They did this at our school district last year. Shit food. I packed them lunches 95% of the time
-
Most parents have no idea how to feed their kids which is why millenials (except me) all of Gen Z are chubby cucks. The next gen will either be worse or rebel against being a pathetic loser because kids always choose the opposite of what their parents think is cool.
-
I do. Not because I hate kids getting food. I hate the message it sends to kids and parents. They state will take care of your simplest and most basic needs. Parents no longer need to even put in an effort to provide. A dangerous message that has consequences that we see now and will in the future.Kaepsknee said:I don’t hate the school lunch thing.
Seriously, how hard is it to get your kids some food before they head out. They don't need a full blown giant country breakfast. Boil some eggs on Sunday night and they can have them all week. Even now eggs can be bought for 25 cents each. Add it some oatmeal and you have something that takes almost no time and costs less than $1.
And the food they feed the kids is garbage.
This just allows kids and parents to be lazier and fatter and good training for when the government tells them what to do.
Arguments in favor usually succumb to the "won't someone think of the children" logical fallacy. An appeal to emotion.
I remember when being on free/reduced lunch was a stigma that parents wanted to avoid and get out of if they got into that position. It was temporary and transitional for most. -
Obviously the results of their work won't stop the government from expanding their invasion of our lives.JoeEDangerously said:They did this at our school district last year. Shit food. I packed them lunches 95% of the time
"Young Americans are increasingly too overweight or undereducated to join the U.S. military, according to a growing number of both retired and active-duty military leaders."
-
It used to be based on income. If you were poor, it was free. Lower middle class got reduced prices. I'm pretty sure rich, SJW San Fransicko families who make like $350,000 a year and send their kids to the specialized pub(l)ic schools don't need this.
-
It's so the poor kids don't "feel" poor.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:It used to be based on income. If you were poor, it was free. Lower middle class got reduced prices. I'm pretty sure rich, SJW San Fransicko families who make like $350,000 a year and send their kids to the specialized pub(l)ic schools don't need this.
Out of feeling poor comes the next generation of go-getters.
