Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Keinholz
Comments
-
A player is paid one year tuition for one year of doing what the coaches say and being on retainer to play/playing.DerekJohnson said:
A normal student would have had to pay some or all tuition, so there was value exchanged. Your analogy doesn't work here.backthepack said:
You should be able to transfer like a normal student could. So no I disagree, don’t make kids miserable.DerekJohnson said:
I was listening to an interview with Michael Saylor. He was talking about the difference between living in a realm where there's no consequence to actions (proof of stake. If you're playing a video game and your character dies, you haven't paid any sort of real life price. Its ghosts and shadows), and a realm where there are irreversible consequences (proof of work. In a sense, if you fall 200 feet you will die. real world consequences).46XiJCAB said:
Imagine being a HC right now. Even if a kid signs he can be gone in a year.Swaye said:It'sreally weird how everyone just casually talks about how much NIL money recruits will costs you against your budget.
So in this sense, if you sign a letter of intent, our society has become so cheap that we all casually accept that its tolerable and even normal to leave 10 months later. I think if you sign a letter of intent you should be bound for at least two years, maybe three. If you choose to leave there should be a price to pay. Or else, if you sign a letter of intent, there should be a contractual agreement, and if you leave after one year then maybe you forfeit some of the NIL to your first school. (10% to the Big Guy. That one's for you @PurpleThrobber). But my point is some sort of consequence. -
-
I'm getting old but when I was in college transferring from four year universities wasn't easy, especially if they have good academis.Mad_Son said:
A player is paid one year tuition for one year of doing what the coaches say and being on retainer to play/playing.DerekJohnson said:
A normal student would have had to pay some or all tuition, so there was value exchanged. Your analogy doesn't work here.backthepack said:
You should be able to transfer like a normal student could. So no I disagree, don’t make kids miserable.DerekJohnson said:
I was listening to an interview with Michael Saylor. He was talking about the difference between living in a realm where there's no consequence to actions (proof of stake. If you're playing a video game and your character dies, you haven't paid any sort of real life price. Its ghosts and shadows), and a realm where there are irreversible consequences (proof of work. In a sense, if you fall 200 feet you will die. real world consequences).46XiJCAB said:
Imagine being a HC right now. Even if a kid signs he can be gone in a year.Swaye said:It'sreally weird how everyone just casually talks about how much NIL money recruits will costs you against your budget.
So in this sense, if you sign a letter of intent, our society has become so cheap that we all casually accept that its tolerable and even normal to leave 10 months later. I think if you sign a letter of intent you should be bound for at least two years, maybe three. If you choose to leave there should be a price to pay. Or else, if you sign a letter of intent, there should be a contractual agreement, and if you leave after one year then maybe you forfeit some of the NIL to your first school. (10% to the Big Guy. That one's for you @PurpleThrobber). But my point is some sort of consequence. -
Except most conferences now guarantee four years. I would suggest that this should go away now. If the players want to transfer at will, they can GTFO if they suck, too. If they want to be professional football players, they can be professional football players and live year to year.Mad_Son said:
A player is paid one year tuition for one year of doing what the coaches say and being on retainer to play/playing.DerekJohnson said:
A normal student would have had to pay some or all tuition, so there was value exchanged. Your analogy doesn't work here.backthepack said:
You should be able to transfer like a normal student could. So no I disagree, don’t make kids miserable.DerekJohnson said:
I was listening to an interview with Michael Saylor. He was talking about the difference between living in a realm where there's no consequence to actions (proof of stake. If you're playing a video game and your character dies, you haven't paid any sort of real life price. Its ghosts and shadows), and a realm where there are irreversible consequences (proof of work. In a sense, if you fall 200 feet you will die. real world consequences).46XiJCAB said:
Imagine being a HC right now. Even if a kid signs he can be gone in a year.Swaye said:It'sreally weird how everyone just casually talks about how much NIL money recruits will costs you against your budget.
So in this sense, if you sign a letter of intent, our society has become so cheap that we all casually accept that its tolerable and even normal to leave 10 months later. I think if you sign a letter of intent you should be bound for at least two years, maybe three. If you choose to leave there should be a price to pay. Or else, if you sign a letter of intent, there should be a contractual agreement, and if you leave after one year then maybe you forfeit some of the NIL to your first school. (10% to the Big Guy. That one's for you @PurpleThrobber). But my point is some sort of consequence. -
Kids get run all the tim, even more in the portal era. Any four year guarantee is in name only.1to392831weretaken said:
Except most conferences now guarantee four years. I would suggest that this should go away now. If the players want to transfer at will, they can GTFO if they suck, too. If they want to be professional football players, they can be professional football players and live year to year.Mad_Son said:
A player is paid one year tuition for one year of doing what the coaches say and being on retainer to play/playing.DerekJohnson said:
A normal student would have had to pay some or all tuition, so there was value exchanged. Your analogy doesn't work here.backthepack said:
You should be able to transfer like a normal student could. So no I disagree, don’t make kids miserable.DerekJohnson said:
I was listening to an interview with Michael Saylor. He was talking about the difference between living in a realm where there's no consequence to actions (proof of stake. If you're playing a video game and your character dies, you haven't paid any sort of real life price. Its ghosts and shadows), and a realm where there are irreversible consequences (proof of work. In a sense, if you fall 200 feet you will die. real world consequences).46XiJCAB said:
Imagine being a HC right now. Even if a kid signs he can be gone in a year.Swaye said:It'sreally weird how everyone just casually talks about how much NIL money recruits will costs you against your budget.
So in this sense, if you sign a letter of intent, our society has become so cheap that we all casually accept that its tolerable and even normal to leave 10 months later. I think if you sign a letter of intent you should be bound for at least two years, maybe three. If you choose to leave there should be a price to pay. Or else, if you sign a letter of intent, there should be a contractual agreement, and if you leave after one year then maybe you forfeit some of the NIL to your first school. (10% to the Big Guy. That one's for you @PurpleThrobber). But my point is some sort of consequence. -
Given that tuition is like $30k per year, universities don't care about grades as long as they're getting paidWoolleyDoog said:
I'm getting old but when I was in college transferring from four year universities wasn't easy, especially if they have good academis.Mad_Son said:
A player is paid one year tuition for one year of doing what the coaches say and being on retainer to play/playing.DerekJohnson said:
A normal student would have had to pay some or all tuition, so there was value exchanged. Your analogy doesn't work here.backthepack said:
You should be able to transfer like a normal student could. So no I disagree, don’t make kids miserable.DerekJohnson said:
I was listening to an interview with Michael Saylor. He was talking about the difference between living in a realm where there's no consequence to actions (proof of stake. If you're playing a video game and your character dies, you haven't paid any sort of real life price. Its ghosts and shadows), and a realm where there are irreversible consequences (proof of work. In a sense, if you fall 200 feet you will die. real world consequences).46XiJCAB said:
Imagine being a HC right now. Even if a kid signs he can be gone in a year.Swaye said:It'sreally weird how everyone just casually talks about how much NIL money recruits will costs you against your budget.
So in this sense, if you sign a letter of intent, our society has become so cheap that we all casually accept that its tolerable and even normal to leave 10 months later. I think if you sign a letter of intent you should be bound for at least two years, maybe three. If you choose to leave there should be a price to pay. Or else, if you sign a letter of intent, there should be a contractual agreement, and if you leave after one year then maybe you forfeit some of the NIL to your first school. (10% to the Big Guy. That one's for you @PurpleThrobber). But my point is some sort of consequence. -
Not sure I believe any of this. But interesting
-
Tosu is doing it the right way.Neighbor2972 said:Not sure I believe any of this. But interesting
-
He got sold by the Just For Men Facial coloring of Ryan Day
-
Like I said - fuck off kid
