Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Slow news day, ladies?

1910111315

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,257 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
    She was backstage at the rally.
    So was the janitor. Maybe he/she will be the next “surprise” witness.

    HUDS. you’ve proven throughout the years what a gullible dipshit you are. I told you PP would one day drop Margaret and you lost it defending her.

    Fucking dummy.
    SFGbob said:

    Surely there must be Secret Service testimony corroborating her accusations right Dazzler?

    What excuse will you use then?
    So there is no Secret Service testimony corroborating her testimony. You love swallowing like a bitch don't you Dazzler.
    We don't have all the testimony, madam. You're betting the ranch on Daddy's version of events?
    When do they present the evidence that Officer Sicknick was murdered by having his brains bashed in with a fire extinguisher? As I recall that was another "fact" you just knew was true.
    Your "recollections" are legendary, of course.

    You defended this coup.

    I will be able to recall that for awhile.
    Are you denying that you swallowed like a bitch the story about Sicknick having his head bashed in with a fire extinguisher you lying piece of shit?
    I don't remember. But you lie about so many things I've supposedly said, that I'll await your proof.

    In any event, about that attempted coup . . .

    I'm all for prosecuting someone that attempted one. Hopefully the good stuff is coming to save our democracy. You usually lead with that though. Throwing lunches, going for esoteric legal angles and trying to steer the car isn't really much of a coup. If that's Trump definition of a coup, then bring on Ron. I want Dave Smith anyways.
    Guess that's why I led with Daddy knowing days in advance that his mob was going to cause trouble. However, it's highly relevant that he wanted to join them. Coup leaders really do have to attend their coups.
    All we've seen thus far is evidence of a sore loser. I've thrown a club or two.

    This shit is never going to trial for Trump. Do you disagree? Screenshot this so that you have something to offset mine. I'll own it.
    I'm not predicting Daddy's going to trial.

    But you're not sitting on a jury. You're just being presented with a compelling case that he orchestrated a coup attempt. You have to see a conviction in order to believe your senses?
    So why isn’t he going to trial?
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,551 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Keep the hearsay content but flip the parties and somehow, I imagine it’s a different analysis.

    In the meantime, something something Ray Epps.

    @MelloDawg biggest poast of the year is a logical fallacy and a hypothetical that he thinks is a real gotcha.

    Nevermind speed limit IQ someone check to see if Mello can breath on his own. Jfc, kiss of death guaranteed.
    Yet entirely accurate.
    Do you realize you only are using fallacies or are you this big of a dipshit?

    Rhetorical question. No hypothetical needed.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,257 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
    She was backstage at the rally.
    So was the janitor. Maybe he/she will be the next “surprise” witness.

    HUDS. you’ve proven throughout the years what a gullible dipshit you are. I told you PP would one day drop Margaret and you lost it defending her.

    Fucking dummy.
    SFGbob said:

    Surely there must be Secret Service testimony corroborating her accusations right Dazzler?

    What excuse will you use then?
    So there is no Secret Service testimony corroborating her testimony. You love swallowing like a bitch don't you Dazzler.
    We don't have all the testimony, madam. You're betting the ranch on Daddy's version of events?
    When do they present the evidence that Officer Sicknick was murdered by having his brains bashed in with a fire extinguisher? As I recall that was another "fact" you just knew was true.
    Your "recollections" are legendary, of course.

    You defended this coup.

    I will be able to recall that for awhile.
    Are you denying that you swallowed like a bitch the story about Sicknick having his head bashed in with a fire extinguisher you lying piece of shit?
    I don't remember. But you lie about so many things I've supposedly said, that I'll await your proof.

    In any event, about that attempted coup . . .

    I'm all for prosecuting someone that attempted one. Hopefully the good stuff is coming to save our democracy. You usually lead with that though. Throwing lunches, going for esoteric legal angles and trying to steer the car isn't really much of a coup. If that's Trump definition of a coup, then bring on Ron. I want Dave Smith anyways.
    Guess that's why I led with Daddy knowing days in advance that his mob was going to cause trouble. However, it's highly relevant that he wanted to join them. Coup leaders really do have to attend their coups.
    All we've seen thus far is evidence of a sore loser. I've thrown a club or two.

    This shit is never going to trial for Trump. Do you disagree? Screenshot this so that you have something to offset mine. I'll own it.
    I'm not predicting Daddy's going to trial.

    But you're not sitting on a jury. You're just being presented with a compelling case that he orchestrated a coup attempt. You have to see a conviction in order to believe your senses?
    So why isn’t he going to trial?
    Hint, it’s either lack of evidence, or lack of conviction in that evidence against a defense and actual court rules. Trump goes on trial and is acquitted Biden way as well move out now. That has to be avoided at all costs. So show trial it is.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Is Trump in prison yet?

    He grabbed the steering wheel!

    Allegedly.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
    She was backstage at the rally.
    So was the janitor. Maybe he/she will be the next “surprise” witness.

    HUDS. you’ve proven throughout the years what a gullible dipshit you are. I told you PP would one day drop Margaret and you lost it defending her.

    Fucking dummy.
    SFGbob said:

    Surely there must be Secret Service testimony corroborating her accusations right Dazzler?

    What excuse will you use then?
    So there is no Secret Service testimony corroborating her testimony. You love swallowing like a bitch don't you Dazzler.
    We don't have all the testimony, madam. You're betting the ranch on Daddy's version of events?
    When do they present the evidence that Officer Sicknick was murdered by having his brains bashed in with a fire extinguisher? As I recall that was another "fact" you just knew was true.
    Your "recollections" are legendary, of course.

    You defended this coup.

    I will be able to recall that for awhile.
    Are you denying that you swallowed like a bitch the story about Sicknick having his head bashed in with a fire extinguisher you lying piece of shit?
    I don't remember. But you lie about so many things I've supposedly said, that I'll await your proof.

    In any event, about that attempted coup . . .

    I'm all for prosecuting someone that attempted one. Hopefully the good stuff is coming to save our democracy. You usually lead with that though. Throwing lunches, going for esoteric legal angles and trying to steer the car isn't really much of a coup. If that's Trump definition of a coup, then bring on Ron. I want Dave Smith anyways.
    Guess that's why I led with Daddy knowing days in advance that his mob was going to cause trouble. However, it's highly relevant that he wanted to join them. Coup leaders really do have to attend their coups.
    He grabbed the steering wheel! The agent said that’s BS as does the driver. But Liz was never interested in the truth.

    Don’t ever change.

    Mr. Gullible Dipshit.
    Let's hear from them.

    Se how easy that was?
    They’ve offered. Liz controls who gets to speak at her Shitshow.

    wE aLmOsT lOsT oUr DeMoCrAcY!

    Fuck off.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
    She was backstage at the rally.
    So was the janitor. Maybe he/she will be the next “surprise” witness.

    HUDS. you’ve proven throughout the years what a gullible dipshit you are. I told you PP would one day drop Margaret and you lost it defending her.

    Fucking dummy.
    SFGbob said:

    Surely there must be Secret Service testimony corroborating her accusations right Dazzler?

    What excuse will you use then?
    So there is no Secret Service testimony corroborating her testimony. You love swallowing like a bitch don't you Dazzler.
    We don't have all the testimony, madam. You're betting the ranch on Daddy's version of events?
    When do they present the evidence that Officer Sicknick was murdered by having his brains bashed in with a fire extinguisher? As I recall that was another "fact" you just knew was true.
    Your "recollections" are legendary, of course.

    You defended this coup.

    I will be able to recall that for awhile.
    Are you denying that you swallowed like a bitch the story about Sicknick having his head bashed in with a fire extinguisher you lying piece of shit?
    I don't remember. But you lie about so many things I've supposedly said, that I'll await your proof.

    In any event, about that attempted coup . . .

    I'm all for prosecuting someone that attempted one. Hopefully the good stuff is coming to save our democracy. You usually lead with that though. Throwing lunches, going for esoteric legal angles and trying to steer the car isn't really much of a coup. If that's Trump definition of a coup, then bring on Ron. I want Dave Smith anyways.
    Guess that's why I led with Daddy knowing days in advance that his mob was going to cause trouble. However, it's highly relevant that he wanted to join them. Coup leaders really do have to attend their coups.
    All we've seen thus far is evidence of a sore loser. I've thrown a club or two.

    This shit is never going to trial for Trump. Do you disagree? Screenshot this so that you have something to offset mine. I'll own it.
    I'm not predicting Daddy's going to trial.

    But you're not sitting on a jury. You're just being presented with a compelling case that he orchestrated a coup attempt. You have to see a conviction in order to believe your senses?
    “Compelling”. Lol......
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
    She was backstage at the rally.
    So was the janitor. Maybe he/she will be the next “surprise” witness.

    HUDS. you’ve proven throughout the years what a gullible dipshit you are. I told you PP would one day drop Margaret and you lost it defending her.

    Fucking dummy.
    SFGbob said:

    Surely there must be Secret Service testimony corroborating her accusations right Dazzler?

    What excuse will you use then?
    So there is no Secret Service testimony corroborating her testimony. You love swallowing like a bitch don't you Dazzler.
    We don't have all the testimony, madam. You're betting the ranch on Daddy's version of events?
    When do they present the evidence that Officer Sicknick was murdered by having his brains bashed in with a fire extinguisher? As I recall that was another "fact" you just knew was true.
    Your "recollections" are legendary, of course.

    You defended this coup.

    I will be able to recall that for awhile.
    Are you denying that you swallowed like a bitch the story about Sicknick having his head bashed in with a fire extinguisher you lying piece of shit?
    I don't remember. But you lie about so many things I've supposedly said, that I'll await your proof.

    In any event, about that attempted coup . . .

    I'm all for prosecuting someone that attempted one. Hopefully the good stuff is coming to save our democracy. You usually lead with that though. Throwing lunches, going for esoteric legal angles and trying to steer the car isn't really much of a coup. If that's Trump definition of a coup, then bring on Ron. I want Dave Smith anyways.
    Guess that's why I led with Daddy knowing days in advance that his mob was going to cause trouble. However, it's highly relevant that he wanted to join them. Coup leaders really do have to attend their coups.
    He grabbed the steering wheel! The agent said that’s BS as does the driver. But Liz was never interested in the truth.

    Don’t ever change.

    Mr. Gullible Dipshit.
    Let's hear from them.

    Se how easy that was?
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
    She was backstage at the rally.
    So was the janitor. Maybe he/she will be the next “surprise” witness.

    HUDS. you’ve proven throughout the years what a gullible dipshit you are. I told you PP would one day drop Margaret and you lost it defending her.

    Fucking dummy.
    SFGbob said:

    Surely there must be Secret Service testimony corroborating her accusations right Dazzler?

    What excuse will you use then?
    So there is no Secret Service testimony corroborating her testimony. You love swallowing like a bitch don't you Dazzler.
    We don't have all the testimony, madam. You're betting the ranch on Daddy's version of events?
    When do they present the evidence that Officer Sicknick was murdered by having his brains bashed in with a fire extinguisher? As I recall that was another "fact" you just knew was true.
    Your "recollections" are legendary, of course.

    You defended this coup.

    I will be able to recall that for awhile.
    Are you denying that you swallowed like a bitch the story about Sicknick having his head bashed in with a fire extinguisher you lying piece of shit?
    I don't remember. But you lie about so many things I've supposedly said, that I'll await your proof.

    In any event, about that attempted coup . . .

    I'm all for prosecuting someone that attempted one. Hopefully the good stuff is coming to save our democracy. You usually lead with that though. Throwing lunches, going for esoteric legal angles and trying to steer the car isn't really much of a coup. If that's Trump definition of a coup, then bring on Ron. I want Dave Smith anyways.
    Guess that's why I led with Daddy knowing days in advance that his mob was going to cause trouble. However, it's highly relevant that he wanted to join them. Coup leaders really do have to attend their coups.
    All we've seen thus far is evidence of a sore loser. I've thrown a club or two.

    This shit is never going to trial for Trump. Do you disagree? Screenshot this so that you have something to offset mine. I'll own it.
    I'm not predicting Daddy's going to trial.

    But you're not sitting on a jury. You're just being presented with a compelling case that he orchestrated a coup attempt. You have to see a conviction in order to believe your senses?
    Compelling case? Are you serious?

    This is a Congressional Committee with a “narrative”, providing only testimony that fits their narrative.

    The jig was up when they decided who would be allowed on the “Committee”.

    Aren’t you interested in a semblance of the truth, “Mr. Conservative”?

    Use your brain.

    Next time, don’t prematurely ejaculate.

    If you had an iota of shame, you’d leave this Board and never return.


  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    What’s more “compelling” evidence wise.

    A Trump “Coup.”

    “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” happened.

    HUDS?