Top 2 best teams into CCG

haie

Best two teams are usually in the north anyways, so dunno how to his helps George's agenda to get two south teams into the game.

BleachedAnusDawg

The N/S divisions are dumb.

HuskyJW

BleachedAnusDawg said:

The N/S divisions are dumb.

Zipper format

UW
UO
UCLA
UA
Utah
Cal



WSU
OSU
USC
ASU
CU
Stanford

haie

BleachedAnusDawg said:

The N/S divisions are dumb.

The divisions are still there for at least this year.

But I like them.

It helps encourage rivalries (lik UW Cal, Oregon Stanford) which gets more fans to games.

The bottom of the North was upsetting top teams at least.

The bottom of the South was barely even fbs.

The one downside that is maybe remedied when they kill divisions is getting USC more often because it's a good draw no matter how shitty either team is.

RaceBannon

Of course I don't like yet another improvement

Now completely fuck up the schedule

haie

RaceBannon said:

Of course I don't like yet another improvement

Now completely fuck up the schedule

Pac 12 basketball already does this and it's weird and stupid. We don't do home and homes with rivals, etc.

WoolleyDoog

If college football really wants to expand the playoff ditch the conference championship games. They're stupid. Instead just take the 2-3 best teams from each conference at the end of the regular season and throw them into a playoff starting after Thanksiving and ending on New Year's in the Rose Bowl.

Half the time in the Pac-12 this is just going to be a rematch with teams having the chance to damage another team going into CFP selection or a team having to re-beat a team they already beat. There's no reason Utah needed to have to beat Oregon again last year to make the Rose Bowl after gutter fucking them two weeks before.

YellowSnow

RaceBannon said:

Of course I don't like yet another improvement

Now completely fuck up the schedule

Has there been one significant improvement to college football in the past 3 decades ? I’ll take my answer of the air.

LawDawg1

Would have been fun to see Minshew cry again.

Kaepsknee

No need for divisions anymore. The natural rivals play each other every year and you rotate schedules so that you play every team at least once every 2 years.

Win win for UW, as you wouldn’t get trained by Oregon EVERY year.

haie

Kaepsknee said:

No need for divisions anymore. The natural rivals play each other every year and you rotate schedules so that you play every team at least once every 2 years.

Win win for UW, as you wouldn’t get trained by Oregon EVERY year.

The 4 nw schools would assuredly play each other every year even without divisions.

It's okay bud. This new format assures that WSU will never sniff a conference championship game but it's not like they ever made it to one with the best coach in the history of their school anyways *faggy wink*

Sources

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Of course I don't like yet another improvement

Now completely fuck up the schedule

Has there been one significant improvement to college football in the past 3 decades ? I’ll take my answer of the air.

A lot of stadiums sell beer now, so there's that

MikeDamone

I miss college football.

ntxduck

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Of course I don't like yet another improvement

Now completely fuck up the schedule

Has there been one significant improvement to college football in the past 3 decades ? I’ll take my answer of the air.

Analytics finally winning out and coaches (except for the big ten) no longer punting on 4th and 1 in + territory?

RaceBannon

ntxduck said:

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Of course I don't like yet another improvement

Now completely fuck up the schedule

Has there been one significant improvement to college football in the past 3 decades ? I’ll take my answer of the air.

Analytics finally winning out and coaches (except Chris Petersen) no longer punting on 4th and 1 in + territory?

RoadDawg55

Petersen is a great program CEO, but fuck did he make some horrible coaching decisions and have a shitty offensive system.