Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Random
HHusky
Member Posts: 21,626
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/at-least-10-dead-in-mass-shooting-at-buffalo-supermarket/ar-AAXhhhp?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=ec2b221ae34d45eaaae05d2a21b757f0
Shooter's review of The Northman not yet released.
Shooter's review of The Northman not yet released.
Comments
Did I get that right, Sally?
Seriously, what is your motivation? Did you post when a black man killed 6 police officers in Dallas? How about the DC drive by murderer who was a black American?
The deaths associated with BLM? The violence. How about Reginald Denny?
Honestly, I don't understand the motivation?
What do black people say when they hear about a shooting?
Any word on if he got the gun from the gun show loophole? Ghost gun? What are we talking here?
First baby food shortages now this. Heck of a job Joey
What were the odds?
No one hate immigrants. People hate the mass flow of illegals that you vote for. And people hate you. And people hate those who hate them
I know who is whipping up the race fever in this country and it isn't Tucker. It's the fucking president
https://instapundit.com/
REPORT: Here’s What the Buffalo Shooter’s Alleged Manifesto Actually Says.
Others have tried to link the shooter in a more general way to right-wing politics. For example, the so-called conservative S.E. Cupp of CNN tried to blame “right-wing extremism” for the shooting.
But here’s what the manifesto says about the shooter’s politics:
Did you always hold these views?
When I was 12 I was deep into communist ideology, talk to anyone from my old high school and ask about me and you will hear that. From age 15 to 18 however, I consistently moved farther to the right. On the political compass I fall in the mild-moderate authoritarian left category, and I would prefer to be called a populist.
So, the shooter describes himself as “authoritarian left-wing,” but the left and S.E. Cupp are trying to blame “right-wing extremism.” Okay?
* * * * * * *
Later in the manifest, the shooter insists, “I would prefer to call myself a populist. But you can call me an ethno-nationalist eco-fascist national socialist if you want, I wouldn’t disagree with you.” He also repeatedly attacks capitalists, and rejected the conservative label because, he wrote, “conservativism is corporatism in disguise, I want no part of it.”
But let’s not pretend that, assuming the manifesto is legitimate, the rhetoric espoused in its pages means the shooter cannot be legitimately aligned with either major political party or political movement. While I would argue that the views expressed in the manifesto echo rhetoric of radical leftism, the manifesto is full of nonsense and garbage that is at times inconsistent. The people who were quick to exploit the situation to attack Fox News and conservatives were wrong and should be ashamed of themselves.
More here: As Twitter Takes to Blaming Tucker Carlson for Shooting, Suspect’s Manifesto Confirms He’s No Fan of Fox News.
That is the issue that got Trump in trouble with the gun nuts - take then gun then have the trial or whatever. And bump stocks.
What do you do? Preventive detention and take the guns? A trial based on online writings then take the gun and lock him up?
Actually solving this shit is harder than it looks. If AR 15s are illegal we will have back alley coat hanger AR15s anyway