Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Vegetable speaks more nonsense

46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
"We can't keep the combustion engine the way it has been. We're moving in the direction that we don't need........oil products." This is exactly what people paying over $4/gal for regular unleaded want to hear today. This guy is so fucking clueless that it's painful to watch. Dementia patients tend to lose their filter.

Great job BidenBros. Nice vote. Way to go. Losers.

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,786 Founders Club
    https://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/api-explains-how-psakis-9000-unused-approved-drilling-permits-red-herring

    “The argument about ‘unused’ leases is a red herring, a smokescreen for energy policies that have had a hamstringing effect,” on oil production, O’Scannlain says.

    “Ultimately, energy policies affect the energy investment climate” O’Scannlain says. Government policies can either discourage or encourage oil producers to take the risk of investing billions of dollars, plus considerable time and effort, to find out whether or not the lands they lease are viable sources of oil.

    “Psaki has made the claim about ‘unused’ federal leases before,” O’Scannlain notes. “It has become a line the White House pivots to when pressed to explain why it isn’t doing more to support American oil and gas production.”

    “Regulatory uncertainty and political hostility to fossil fuels discourage long-term investments,” The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board agrees, explaining that President Biden’s anti-domestic energy policies have made his the first administration in at least twenty years to go an entire year without selling a single onshore lease.


    The Biden Administration isn’t just refusing to grant additional leases - it has actually revoked a permit that could bring 830,000 barrels of crude oil daily to the U.S.

    In a controversial move during his first day in office, Pres. Biden revoked the permit allowing extension of the Keystone XL pipeline to Alberta, Canada. If completed, the pipeline could potentially provide the U.S. with more oil than it currently buys from Russia.

    Plus, it’s not as quick and easy as merely flipping a switch, since it takes years of work to determine whether the leased land even holds enough oil to be commercially viable, O’Scannlain writes.

    Then, there’s the long process of overcoming “administrative and legal challenges at every step along the way The lengthy process to develop them from a lease often is extended by administrative and legal challenges at every step along the way.”


  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,740 Standard Supporter
    edited March 2022
    46XiJCAB said:

    "We can't keep the combustion engine the way it has been. We're moving in the direction that we don't need........oil products." This is exactly what people paying over $4/gal for regular unleaded want to hear today. This guy is so fucking clueless that it's painful to watch. Dementia patients tend to lose their filter.

    Great job BidenBros. Nice vote. Way to go. Losers.

    Biden isn't saying what he is saying because of dementia. He is saying what his handlers are telling him to say. Their hatred of private sector working Americans and their ignorance of science, economics and history are the reason. Oh, and they are corrupt and getting paid. You think Mayor Buttplug could get a real world private sector job that didn't involve french fries?
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,940 Swaye's Wigwam
    The biggest issue with all of this is the required infrastructure to support electric cars. Build a trillion of government infrastructure or whatever and investments and innovation will be centered around that and not investing at the same rates for an actual solution like hydrogen or whatever is next. And the lobbyists will actively hinder it.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    "We can't keep the combustion engine the way it has been. We're moving in the direction that we don't need........oil products." This is exactly what people paying over $4/gal for regular unleaded want to hear today. This guy is so fucking clueless that it's painful to watch. Dementia patients tend to lose their filter.

    Great job BidenBros. Nice vote. Way to go. Losers.

    Biden isn't saying what he is saying because of dementia. He is saying what his handlers are telling him to say. Their hatred of private sector working Americans and their ignorance of science, economics and history are the reason. Oh, and they are corrupt and getting paid. You think Mayor Buttplug could get a real world private sector job that didn't involve french fries?
    Well maybe not fries but I believe he has a skill that's marketable.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Libs believe that oil is only used in combustion engines. Get rid of those pesky things and no need for oil. Easy peasy.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    I miss the days when some retard here or the halfbrains site would go on an on about peak oil. In 2 years, 3 tops.

    Now it’s so abundant we literally have to fuck ourselves over to not have enough.


    We was the peak oil guy? Does anyone remember. He seems TKSish in his level of idiocy.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    https://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/api-explains-how-psakis-9000-unused-approved-drilling-permits-red-herring

    “The argument about ‘unused’ leases is a red herring, a smokescreen for energy policies that have had a hamstringing effect,” on oil production, O’Scannlain says.

    “Ultimately, energy policies affect the energy investment climate” O’Scannlain says. Government policies can either discourage or encourage oil producers to take the risk of investing billions of dollars, plus considerable time and effort, to find out whether or not the lands they lease are viable sources of oil.

    “Psaki has made the claim about ‘unused’ federal leases before,” O’Scannlain notes. “It has become a line the White House pivots to when pressed to explain why it isn’t doing more to support American oil and gas production.”

    “Regulatory uncertainty and political hostility to fossil fuels discourage long-term investments,” The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board agrees, explaining that President Biden’s anti-domestic energy policies have made his the first administration in at least twenty years to go an entire year without selling a single onshore lease.


    The Biden Administration isn’t just refusing to grant additional leases - it has actually revoked a permit that could bring 830,000 barrels of crude oil daily to the U.S.

    In a controversial move during his first day in office, Pres. Biden revoked the permit allowing extension of the Keystone XL pipeline to Alberta, Canada. If completed, the pipeline could potentially provide the U.S. with more oil than it currently buys from Russia.

    Plus, it’s not as quick and easy as merely flipping a switch, since it takes years of work to determine whether the leased land even holds enough oil to be commercially viable, O’Scannlain writes.

    Then, there’s the long process of overcoming “administrative and legal challenges at every step along the way The lengthy process to develop them from a lease often is extended by administrative and legal challenges at every step along the way.”


    This is helpful. A couple of weeks ago I was trying to figure out what Biden has done to decrease oil production. I got a lot of “keystone pipeline” type horseshit that made no sense. And the TugCons couldn’t really articulate anything else.

    This makes sense. Race does it again!
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    I miss the days when some retard here or the halfbrains site would go on an on about peak oil. In 2 years, 3 tops.

    Now it’s so abundant we literally have to fuck ourselves over to not have enough.


    We was the peak oil guy? Does anyone remember. He seems TKSish in his level of idiocy.

    Owl, the dumbest poaster in the history of message boards.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,220 Swaye's Wigwam

    https://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/api-explains-how-psakis-9000-unused-approved-drilling-permits-red-herring

    “The argument about ‘unused’ leases is a red herring, a smokescreen for energy policies that have had a hamstringing effect,” on oil production, O’Scannlain says.

    “Ultimately, energy policies affect the energy investment climate” O’Scannlain says. Government policies can either discourage or encourage oil producers to take the risk of investing billions of dollars, plus considerable time and effort, to find out whether or not the lands they lease are viable sources of oil.

    “Psaki has made the claim about ‘unused’ federal leases before,” O’Scannlain notes. “It has become a line the White House pivots to when pressed to explain why it isn’t doing more to support American oil and gas production.”

    “Regulatory uncertainty and political hostility to fossil fuels discourage long-term investments,” The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board agrees, explaining that President Biden’s anti-domestic energy policies have made his the first administration in at least twenty years to go an entire year without selling a single onshore lease.


    The Biden Administration isn’t just refusing to grant additional leases - it has actually revoked a permit that could bring 830,000 barrels of crude oil daily to the U.S.

    In a controversial move during his first day in office, Pres. Biden revoked the permit allowing extension of the Keystone XL pipeline to Alberta, Canada. If completed, the pipeline could potentially provide the U.S. with more oil than it currently buys from Russia.

    Plus, it’s not as quick and easy as merely flipping a switch, since it takes years of work to determine whether the leased land even holds enough oil to be commercially viable, O’Scannlain writes.

    Then, there’s the long process of overcoming “administrative and legal challenges at every step along the way The lengthy process to develop them from a lease often is extended by administrative and legal challenges at every step along the way.”


    This is helpful. A couple of weeks ago I was trying to figure out what Biden has done to decrease oil production. I got a lot of “keystone pipeline” type horseshit that made no sense. And the TugCons couldn’t really articulate anything else.

    This makes sense. Race does it again!
    Hurtful.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,220 Swaye's Wigwam
    Was on a call yesterday morning where we are shutting in pipelines/leases in California. Not because of the $ of oil but because of the price of regulatory compliance with recent EPA & DOT decisions. I'm hearing this has no effect on oil prices though.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Was on a call yesterday morning where we are shutting in pipelines/leases in California. Not because of the $ of oil but because of the price of regulatory compliance with recent EPA & DOT decisions. I'm hearing this has no effect on oil prices though.

    Just CA? Can the smaller O & G companies leasing private mineral rights survive the changes Joey's is implementing?
  • LebamDawgLebamDawg Member Posts: 8,742 Standard Supporter
    in a Forbes article in Jan 2021 they mention the impact of secretarial orders and an Eos stopping oil and they are all related to climate change. So many folks did not think that it was directly related to the oil industries.

    The EO impact
    "President Biden followed that action up with Executive Order on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad. The biggest takeaway from this order was an indefinite “pause on new oil and natural gas leases on public lands” until a comprehensive review on the climate change impacts can be completed."

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2021/01/29/how-president-bidens-executive-orders-impact-the-oil-industry/?sh=7f6f228a4ef4
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    81 Million moronic voters. I can almost believe it actually happened.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Bob_C said:

    The biggest issue with all of this is the required infrastructure to support electric cars. Build a trillion of government infrastructure or whatever and investments and innovation will be centered around that and not investing at the same rates for an actual solution like hydrogen or whatever is next. And the lobbyists will actively hinder it.

    Exactly. I see a lot of 400 person apartment complex’s with room for 150 cars. The rest are parked all over the side streets. How in the fuck are EV’s going to work for the 10s of millions apartment dwellers and those in the city who park on the street? I’m probably too dumb to reimagine EV charging. Getting people on mass transit will be another major push. Except of course for the people pushing it. They will still be driving.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    LebamDawg said:

    in a Forbes article in Jan 2021 they mention the impact of secretarial orders and an Eos stopping oil and they are all related to climate change. So many folks did not think that it was directly related to the oil industries.

    The EO impact
    "President Biden followed that action up with Executive Order on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad. The biggest takeaway from this order was an indefinite “pause on new oil and natural gas leases on public lands” until a comprehensive review on the climate change impacts can be completed."

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2021/01/29/how-president-bidens-executive-orders-impact-the-oil-industry/?sh=7f6f228a4ef4

    Sounds like they need an embroidered invitation to start drilling on their leases.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,886
    Get an electric Car!!! Is the new Learn to Code!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.