Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

He's Not Wrong: 'Bigger Crime than Watergate'

1…1112141617…20

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Sad old man rea

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
    Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
    respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"

    not excited?
    White flag
    I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.
    I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
    awesome
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Sad old man rea

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
    Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
    respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"

    not excited?
    White flag
    I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.
    I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
    awesome
    Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.
    "russiagate hoax"

    What is it?
    Now you're arguing with yourself.
    No, I want to know what you mean by it.

    It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.

    The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
    EVIDENCE! Fu*k off. Loser.
    brilliantly argued, Boris.
    You yammer about evidence then go on a Blue Anon screed with zero evidence. That deserves a Fu*k off and nothing more.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.
    Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.

    Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.

    And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.



    I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.

    Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?
    When will you see your therapist?
    So, no engagement.

    Disappointing, but not astonishing.
    I've answered all of your questions. Already told you I don't care about it. And thanks for reading.
    Pathological liars can sometimes get confused.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,500 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani

    Ok sure.
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.
    Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.

    Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.

    And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.



    I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.

    Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?
    When will you see your therapist?
    @PurpleThrobber any advice here?
    You can't fix stupid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.
    Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.

    Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.

    And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.



    I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.

    Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?
    You do realize that most in DC consider Durham "non-partisan" right? Or have you not been out from under you bed for so long, other than to link up with Blue Anon, that you don't know this? You're a moron Dazzler, you prove it with each poast.
    So Durham’s merely incompetent?

    Helluva defense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,240 Founders Club
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani

    Ok sure.
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.
    Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.

    Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.

    And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.



    I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.

    Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?
    When will you see your therapist?
    @PurpleThrobber any advice here?
    You can't fix stupid.
    I meant on therapists.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

    Durham = S. Powell = Guiliani



    I understand you're disappointed. The hurt will heal.
    Not hurt at all. Like I said, everyone's backing away from your sad conspiracy theory that 'daddy' was installed by russian interference. It's beyond comical at this point. Hillary was a shitty candidate. You've spent how many years of your life believing in this shit? I have friends and coworkers that are just like you, they would send me links to stupid left wing blogs and articles saying that Trump was going to jail. I always told them they were crazy. I was right.
    I've never claimed Daddy was "installed by Russian interference". He won the electoral college. No one can possibly prove whether Russia's help was outcome determinative, but he did receive Russia's help, whether that help was coordinated with the campaign or not. And Hillary was shitty at running for office too.

    I've also never said Daddy is going to jail. He's undeniably committed crimes, but I have zero confidence in the courage of the Justice Department to even prosecute them, much less to seek jail time. Many of Daddy's crimes can no longer be prosecuted anyway.

    Back to the subject: Durham's filing has got you all excited for no good reason. The piece I've linked does a good job of explaining why your false hopes have been raised. (For example, Daddy's White House cannot have been "spied upon" in 2014, 2015, 2016). Frankly, the whole thing has raised the issue of Daddy's Russian connections again and brings renewed attention to the anomalies in the data that have never been explained to anyone's satisfaction. It may well backfire on you and Daddy.

    BlueAnon. That's your Dazzler. Daddy committed crimes but the people that spent 5 years trying to put him in jail decided not to prosecute him and now it's just too late. You're a F'n kook, you always have been.
    Daddy committed lots of crimes. Hell, the National Archives just retrieved stolen/classified documents from him the other day.

    Tax fraud? Yes. But much too old to prosecute in the case of his inheritance.

    And those are just the crimes that are beyond serious debate.



    I just knew that someone would wind you up and you'd let it rip. I'm going to go get some popcorn.

    Where will you be when the wheels come off Durham crazy train though?
    You do realize that most in DC consider Durham "non-partisan" right? Or have you not been out from under you bed for so long, other than to link up with Blue Anon, that you don't know this? You're a moron Dazzler, you prove it with each poast.
    So Durham’s merely incompetent?

    Helluva defense.
    In the eyes of a Kook like you that opinion means very little. Are you on the Clinton payroll?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,570 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Sad old man rea

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
    Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
    respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"

    not excited?
    White flag
    I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.
    I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
    awesome
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Sad old man rea

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
    Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
    respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"

    not excited?
    White flag
    I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.
    I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
    awesome
    Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.
    "russiagate hoax"

    What is it?
    Now you're arguing with yourself.
    No, I want to know what you mean by it.

    It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.

    The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
    Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.

    Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Sad old man rea

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
    Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
    respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"

    not excited?
    White flag
    I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.
    I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
    awesome
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Sad old man rea

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
    Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
    respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"

    not excited?
    White flag
    I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.
    I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
    awesome
    Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.
    "russiagate hoax"

    What is it?
    Now you're arguing with yourself.
    No, I want to know what you mean by it.

    It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.

    The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
    Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.

    Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
    Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.

    https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370


    What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.

    Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.

    Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Sad old man rea

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
    Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
    respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"

    not excited?
    White flag
    I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.
    I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
    awesome
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Sad old man rea

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Russian collusion--"Yeah, that sounds right."
    Bountygate--"Just has to be true"
    respiratory virus outbreak a few hundred yards from the only research center in China--"It's crackpot theory to suggest it came from there! It was from a bat that flew 1000 miles without infecting anybody on the way and released the virus there. You gals"

    not excited?
    White flag
    I'm not gonna chase you when you obviously want to run away.
    I'm right here old man. And laughing at your double standards for what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
    awesome
    Yes it is awesome. You attack people here every day and call them conspiracy theorists. You rant about 'daddy' and fascism. All while swallowing whole the russiagate hoax and laughing off the fascism from your own party. I'm a conspiracy therapist.
    "russiagate hoax"

    What is it?
    Now you're arguing with yourself.
    No, I want to know what you mean by it.

    It's not a hoax that Russia tried to help Daddy. It's not a hoax that Daddy welcomed that help.

    The only unproven thing is any actual conspiracy with between his campaign and Russia. Even that's merely unproven, not disproven.
    Obunghole and Hillary illegally tapped his campaign, phones and Whitehouse. Years of investigation by the left has found zero. Yet you think it's real.

    Drown yourself. You're wasting everyone else's oxygen.
    Uncle Sled weighs in. Doesn't understand the story. Doesn't care.

    https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-spying-story-clearly-not-trump-thinks-rcna16370


    What we actually have is a superfluous story about cybersecurity researchers at Joffe's company examining malware in the White House — from Obama’s term, not Trump’s — and there doesn't appear to be any connection between Joffe's firm and Clinton.

    Maybe Durham and his team didn’t realize their court filing would be exploited as part of a public-deception campaign launched by Trump and his media cohorts. Perhaps Durham and his team knew what would happen and didn’t care.

    Either way, when your weird uncle who consumes conservative media all day sent you all-caps emails about Trump being “spied” on, he was pushing a story with no real basis in fact. The original “Spygate” story was a sad joke, and its third iteration is no better.
    Good effort, sounds like Rachel is a strong source.
    Rachel didn't write it.

    Sounds like none of you gals really bothered to read Durham's pleading.

    Trump wasn't President during all this "spying on the White House".
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter