Sarks first was really bad
Sarks first was really bad This is probably on par with Sark's first class.
I'm glad we're asking this question again. I guess I'm giving the staff a pass on this one but it's not encouraging. Gilby's second class was abysmal too.
So in the top three worst classes of the last 20 years, but not the absolute worst. Good deal. Nowhere to go but up. Or the trash can.
So in the top three worst classes of the last 20 years, but not the absolute worst. Good deal. Nowhere to go but up. Or the trash can. Calm yourself my native brother. Pete’s class outside of flipping Buddha and snagging McGary was panned around here for its predominant MWC flavor. On a whole the average rating per player was lower than Boners first class. Otton is a stud and I really like Dunn. Some high end contributors came out of that 2014 class. At least two, probably three years until we can decide if we hate these guys or not.
Sarks first class had an average rating of .814. It was epically bad. This class is .857. Trufant and Price were really the only players from the 2009 class that made a positive impact. Most burned out before ever seeing the field. This class will have more than two contribute positively to winning. I’m certain of it.
How was Pete's first class received on signing day? I truly don't recall, but I'm optimistic that we hated it at the time and look back on it more fondly now because his talent evaluation was superior to the general populace so the presumed scrubs were studs.
This staff took a bunch of 2 and 0 stars and made Fresneck belong against the Pac 12Lipo
Here is Sark's full class and Scout's rankingBattsFellnerBarnettCrichtonTucker TrufantTivaoMafoeShamburgerTokolahiMakaulaPuluGaisieMahanBoyceWallaceRobinson (Chris not Nate)PriceJohnsonI recognize Cricton, Trufant, Shamburger, Pulu, Price, and Johnson
Sarks first class had an average rating of .814. It was epically bad. This class is .857. Trufant and Price were really the only players from the 2009 class that made a positive impact. Most burned out before ever seeing the field. This class will have more than two contribute positively to winning. I’m certain of it. That is a pretty big difference. But I did read somewhere that recruiting scores have been gradually inflated since Sark's first year. Many more 3-5 star players now than there were over 10 years ago. Am I wrong?
Here is Sark's full class and Scout's rankingBattsFellnerBarnettCrichtonTucker TrufantTivaoMafoeShamburgerTokolahiMakaulaPuluGaisieMahanBoyceWallaceRobinson (Chris not Nate)PriceJohnsonI recognize Cricton, Trufant, Shamburger, Pulu, Price, and Johnson Amazing. Thing is that Sark had a lot of time (no early signing date) and was coming from SC, where he should've had ins with a fair number of guys who were willing to consider following him. One wouldve thought there were at least a few feunge guys who SV receuited but didnt wnd up offering.There was no excuse. He simply didn't recruit.
Here is Sark's full class and Scout's rankingBattsFellnerBarnettCrichtonTucker TrufantTivaoMafoeShamburgerTokolahiMakaulaPuluGaisieMahanBoyceWallaceRobinson (Chris not Nate)PriceJohnsonI recognize Cricton, Trufant, Shamburger, Pulu, Price, and Johnson Amazing. Thing is that Sark had a lot of time (no early signing date) and was coming from SC, where he should've had ins with a fair number of guys who were willing to consider following him. One wouldve thought there were at least a few feunge guys who SV receuited but didnt wnd up offering.There was no excuse. He simply didn't recruit. Not to defend Sark but we went 0-12. That doesn’t make it easy to recruit.
Sarks first class had an average rating of .814. It was epically bad. This class is .857. Trufant and Price were really the only players from the 2009 class that made a positive impact. Most burned out before ever seeing the field. This class will have more than two contribute positively to winning. I’m certain of it. That is a pretty big difference. But I did read somewhere that recruiting scores have been gradually inflated since Sark's first year. Many more 3-5 star players now than there were over 10 years ago. Am I wrong? Everyone is a three star. It’s hard to sign a guy that isn’t 3 star now.