Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Catch 22 - A beautiful dilemma

pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,275 Founders Club

Comments

  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,188 Standard Supporter
    Its funny. The first thing my liberal friends said was "I wonder what the nominee will be". The first thing they think of is skin color and sex. Turn on the news and what do I hear the rat media talking about? Which black woman is it going to be. Racism runs rampant in the dem party.

    Imagine being a liberal and FEELING good about yourself because you allow a black woman to sit on the bench. You hand picked the color of their skin. Whitey elite rats placating part of their base not because of talent but simply due to their skin color. As we have seen with sotomayor, the last justice picked simply because of her sex and race, when race and sex are the only criteria, you get people not fit for court. Shoe horning liberals onto the court is tough enough but shoe horning a liberal who will toe the party line, disregard the Constitution and be a minority woman is settling and the country will suffer for it.

    We have the highest court in the land and rat leadership are telling 94% of the country they need not apply. Racism personified.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,726 Standard Supporter
    What won't be pushed by the MSM is that Cho Bai Den voted against Clarence Thomas because he wasn't an authentic black and pushed the Anita Hill lies. Then the dementia patient filibustered and voted against the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown, a black woman, to the US Circuit Court. Once again skin color only matters if the black is firmly on the plantation and hasn't escaped their master.

    https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/01/26/ingraham-biden-opposed-and-filibustered-janice-rogers-browns-nomination-race-and-gender-only-count-if-you-have-left-wing-beliefs/

    On Wednesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Ingraham Angle,” host Laura Ingraham contrasted President Joe Biden’s vow to nominate a black woman to the Supreme Court to replace outgoing Justice Stephen Breyer with then-Sen. Biden’s opposition to and multiple filibusters of the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown to the federal bench by then-President George W. Bush in 2003 and 2005 and remarked that “race and gender, they only count if you’re thought to be a committed judicial activist, judicial leftist.” [Sounds familiar. She ain't black.]

    Ingraham said, [relevant remarks begin around 2:50] “I’m thinking back on the nomination of what would’ve been another first, which is the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown. And she was filibustered by none other than Joe Biden. So, this idea of appointing a black woman to the judiciary, he voted three times against confirming her just to be a U.S. circuit judge. I mean, this wasn’t even to the Supreme Court. So, race and gender, they only count if you’re thought to be a committed judicial activist, judicial leftist.”
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,710 Founders Club
    To be fair Joe just didn't want the courts to be a racial jungle
  • hardhathardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    Binders of black women
Sign In or Register to comment.